A Contrast Calibration Protocol for X-ray Speckle Visibility Spectroscopy
X-ray free electron lasers, with their ultrashort highly coherent pulses, opened up the opportunity of probing ultrafast nano- and atomic-scale dynamics in amorphous and disordered material systems via speckle visibility spectroscopy. However, the anticipated count rate in a typical experiment is us...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/fcc73409b9684d0c82f0d95d550136be |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:fcc73409b9684d0c82f0d95d550136be |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:fcc73409b9684d0c82f0d95d550136be2021-11-11T15:07:14ZA Contrast Calibration Protocol for X-ray Speckle Visibility Spectroscopy10.3390/app1121100412076-3417https://doaj.org/article/fcc73409b9684d0c82f0d95d550136be2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/21/10041https://doaj.org/toc/2076-3417X-ray free electron lasers, with their ultrashort highly coherent pulses, opened up the opportunity of probing ultrafast nano- and atomic-scale dynamics in amorphous and disordered material systems via speckle visibility spectroscopy. However, the anticipated count rate in a typical experiment is usually low. Therefore, visibility needs to be extracted via photon statistics analysis, i.e., by estimating the probabilities of multiple photons per pixel events using pixelated detectors. Considering the realistic X-ray detector responses including charge cloud sharing between pixels, pixel readout noise, and gain non-uniformity, speckle visibility extraction relying on photon assignment algorithms are often computationally demanding and suffer from systematic errors. In this paper, we present a systematic study of the commonly-used algorithms by applying them to an experimental data set containing small-angle coherent scattering with visibility levels ranging from below 1% to ∼60%. We also propose a contrast calibration protocol and show that a computationally lightweight algorithm can be implemented for high-speed correlation evaluation.Yanwen SunVincent EspositoPhilip Adam HartConny HanssonHaoyuan LiKazutaka NakaharaJames Paton MacArthurSilke NelsonTakahiro SatoSanghoon SongPeihao SunPaul FuossMark SuttonDiling ZhuMDPI AGarticlespecklevisibilitycontrastTechnologyTEngineering (General). Civil engineering (General)TA1-2040Biology (General)QH301-705.5PhysicsQC1-999ChemistryQD1-999ENApplied Sciences, Vol 11, Iss 10041, p 10041 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
speckle visibility contrast Technology T Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 Biology (General) QH301-705.5 Physics QC1-999 Chemistry QD1-999 |
spellingShingle |
speckle visibility contrast Technology T Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 Biology (General) QH301-705.5 Physics QC1-999 Chemistry QD1-999 Yanwen Sun Vincent Esposito Philip Adam Hart Conny Hansson Haoyuan Li Kazutaka Nakahara James Paton MacArthur Silke Nelson Takahiro Sato Sanghoon Song Peihao Sun Paul Fuoss Mark Sutton Diling Zhu A Contrast Calibration Protocol for X-ray Speckle Visibility Spectroscopy |
description |
X-ray free electron lasers, with their ultrashort highly coherent pulses, opened up the opportunity of probing ultrafast nano- and atomic-scale dynamics in amorphous and disordered material systems via speckle visibility spectroscopy. However, the anticipated count rate in a typical experiment is usually low. Therefore, visibility needs to be extracted via photon statistics analysis, i.e., by estimating the probabilities of multiple photons per pixel events using pixelated detectors. Considering the realistic X-ray detector responses including charge cloud sharing between pixels, pixel readout noise, and gain non-uniformity, speckle visibility extraction relying on photon assignment algorithms are often computationally demanding and suffer from systematic errors. In this paper, we present a systematic study of the commonly-used algorithms by applying them to an experimental data set containing small-angle coherent scattering with visibility levels ranging from below 1% to ∼60%. We also propose a contrast calibration protocol and show that a computationally lightweight algorithm can be implemented for high-speed correlation evaluation. |
format |
article |
author |
Yanwen Sun Vincent Esposito Philip Adam Hart Conny Hansson Haoyuan Li Kazutaka Nakahara James Paton MacArthur Silke Nelson Takahiro Sato Sanghoon Song Peihao Sun Paul Fuoss Mark Sutton Diling Zhu |
author_facet |
Yanwen Sun Vincent Esposito Philip Adam Hart Conny Hansson Haoyuan Li Kazutaka Nakahara James Paton MacArthur Silke Nelson Takahiro Sato Sanghoon Song Peihao Sun Paul Fuoss Mark Sutton Diling Zhu |
author_sort |
Yanwen Sun |
title |
A Contrast Calibration Protocol for X-ray Speckle Visibility Spectroscopy |
title_short |
A Contrast Calibration Protocol for X-ray Speckle Visibility Spectroscopy |
title_full |
A Contrast Calibration Protocol for X-ray Speckle Visibility Spectroscopy |
title_fullStr |
A Contrast Calibration Protocol for X-ray Speckle Visibility Spectroscopy |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Contrast Calibration Protocol for X-ray Speckle Visibility Spectroscopy |
title_sort |
contrast calibration protocol for x-ray speckle visibility spectroscopy |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/fcc73409b9684d0c82f0d95d550136be |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yanwensun acontrastcalibrationprotocolforxrayspecklevisibilityspectroscopy AT vincentesposito acontrastcalibrationprotocolforxrayspecklevisibilityspectroscopy AT philipadamhart acontrastcalibrationprotocolforxrayspecklevisibilityspectroscopy AT connyhansson acontrastcalibrationprotocolforxrayspecklevisibilityspectroscopy AT haoyuanli acontrastcalibrationprotocolforxrayspecklevisibilityspectroscopy AT kazutakanakahara acontrastcalibrationprotocolforxrayspecklevisibilityspectroscopy AT jamespatonmacarthur acontrastcalibrationprotocolforxrayspecklevisibilityspectroscopy AT silkenelson acontrastcalibrationprotocolforxrayspecklevisibilityspectroscopy AT takahirosato acontrastcalibrationprotocolforxrayspecklevisibilityspectroscopy AT sanghoonsong acontrastcalibrationprotocolforxrayspecklevisibilityspectroscopy AT peihaosun acontrastcalibrationprotocolforxrayspecklevisibilityspectroscopy AT paulfuoss acontrastcalibrationprotocolforxrayspecklevisibilityspectroscopy AT marksutton acontrastcalibrationprotocolforxrayspecklevisibilityspectroscopy AT dilingzhu acontrastcalibrationprotocolforxrayspecklevisibilityspectroscopy AT yanwensun contrastcalibrationprotocolforxrayspecklevisibilityspectroscopy AT vincentesposito contrastcalibrationprotocolforxrayspecklevisibilityspectroscopy AT philipadamhart contrastcalibrationprotocolforxrayspecklevisibilityspectroscopy AT connyhansson contrastcalibrationprotocolforxrayspecklevisibilityspectroscopy AT haoyuanli contrastcalibrationprotocolforxrayspecklevisibilityspectroscopy AT kazutakanakahara contrastcalibrationprotocolforxrayspecklevisibilityspectroscopy AT jamespatonmacarthur contrastcalibrationprotocolforxrayspecklevisibilityspectroscopy AT silkenelson contrastcalibrationprotocolforxrayspecklevisibilityspectroscopy AT takahirosato contrastcalibrationprotocolforxrayspecklevisibilityspectroscopy AT sanghoonsong contrastcalibrationprotocolforxrayspecklevisibilityspectroscopy AT peihaosun contrastcalibrationprotocolforxrayspecklevisibilityspectroscopy AT paulfuoss contrastcalibrationprotocolforxrayspecklevisibilityspectroscopy AT marksutton contrastcalibrationprotocolforxrayspecklevisibilityspectroscopy AT dilingzhu contrastcalibrationprotocolforxrayspecklevisibilityspectroscopy |
_version_ |
1718437189610635264 |