Ottoman and British Factors in Anti-French Resistance of Beylik Constantine in 1830—1837

The poorly studied initial period of the anti-colonial struggle of the Algerian people against the French occupation is considered. Until 1830, the Algerian Regency was a semi-autonomous province of the Ottoman Empire. It is proved that in the first years after the capture of France, spiritual ties...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: N. A. Zherlitsina
Formato: article
Lenguaje:RU
Publicado: Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/fce3950e73064837b6a2537349ed8517
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:fce3950e73064837b6a2537349ed8517
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:fce3950e73064837b6a2537349ed85172021-12-02T07:58:14ZOttoman and British Factors in Anti-French Resistance of Beylik Constantine in 1830—18372225-756X2227-129510.24224/2227-1295-2021-4-357-371https://doaj.org/article/fce3950e73064837b6a2537349ed85172021-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/2622https://doaj.org/toc/2225-756Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2227-1295The poorly studied initial period of the anti-colonial struggle of the Algerian people against the French occupation is considered. Until 1830, the Algerian Regency was a semi-autonomous province of the Ottoman Empire. It is proved that in the first years after the capture of France, spiritual ties with the former metropolis remained strong and determined the strategies of resistance of the former Turkish ruling elite in the country. The author notes that the last bey of Constantine’s Beylik, Ahmed, loyal to the ideas of Ottomanism, for seven years effectively resisted the attempts of the French to establish themselves in this Algerian province. The article shows that although the attributes of Constantine's independence in those years indicated its Arab character, Ahmed Bey retained the Turkish concept of the state. It is concluded that the legal power, as before, relied on the sanction of the Turkish Sultan, the spiritual and political leader of the Ottoman Empire. The author concludes that Ahmed Bey was defeated without the support of his suzerain. It is proved that he did not manage to enlist the help of Great Britain, which, although opposed to French expansionism, did not consider Algeria so important to enter into a conflict with France because of it.N. A. ZherlitsinaTsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektovarticlealgeriafranceottoman empiregreat britainahmed beycolonialismanti-colonial strugglefrench colonial ideologySlavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languagesPG1-9665RUНаучный диалог, Vol 0, Iss 4, Pp 357-371 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language RU
topic algeria
france
ottoman empire
great britain
ahmed bey
colonialism
anti-colonial struggle
french colonial ideology
Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages
PG1-9665
spellingShingle algeria
france
ottoman empire
great britain
ahmed bey
colonialism
anti-colonial struggle
french colonial ideology
Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages
PG1-9665
N. A. Zherlitsina
Ottoman and British Factors in Anti-French Resistance of Beylik Constantine in 1830—1837
description The poorly studied initial period of the anti-colonial struggle of the Algerian people against the French occupation is considered. Until 1830, the Algerian Regency was a semi-autonomous province of the Ottoman Empire. It is proved that in the first years after the capture of France, spiritual ties with the former metropolis remained strong and determined the strategies of resistance of the former Turkish ruling elite in the country. The author notes that the last bey of Constantine’s Beylik, Ahmed, loyal to the ideas of Ottomanism, for seven years effectively resisted the attempts of the French to establish themselves in this Algerian province. The article shows that although the attributes of Constantine's independence in those years indicated its Arab character, Ahmed Bey retained the Turkish concept of the state. It is concluded that the legal power, as before, relied on the sanction of the Turkish Sultan, the spiritual and political leader of the Ottoman Empire. The author concludes that Ahmed Bey was defeated without the support of his suzerain. It is proved that he did not manage to enlist the help of Great Britain, which, although opposed to French expansionism, did not consider Algeria so important to enter into a conflict with France because of it.
format article
author N. A. Zherlitsina
author_facet N. A. Zherlitsina
author_sort N. A. Zherlitsina
title Ottoman and British Factors in Anti-French Resistance of Beylik Constantine in 1830—1837
title_short Ottoman and British Factors in Anti-French Resistance of Beylik Constantine in 1830—1837
title_full Ottoman and British Factors in Anti-French Resistance of Beylik Constantine in 1830—1837
title_fullStr Ottoman and British Factors in Anti-French Resistance of Beylik Constantine in 1830—1837
title_full_unstemmed Ottoman and British Factors in Anti-French Resistance of Beylik Constantine in 1830—1837
title_sort ottoman and british factors in anti-french resistance of beylik constantine in 1830—1837
publisher Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/fce3950e73064837b6a2537349ed8517
work_keys_str_mv AT nazherlitsina ottomanandbritishfactorsinantifrenchresistanceofbeylikconstantinein18301837
_version_ 1718398762944036864