Evaluation of endoscopic assisted suction coagulation adenoidectomy versus traditional curettage technique

Abstract Background Adenoidal hypertrophy is a common condition in children and can cause symptoms such as mouth breathing, nasal discharge, snoring, sleep apnea, and hyponasal speech. The curettage adenoidectomy has some disadvantages, especially the intranasal extension of the adenoid tissue that...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Ayman Ali Abd Elfattah Ali, Mohammed Kamar Elsharnouby, Yaser Abd Elwahab Khalil, Rehab Nour Eldin Mohammad Gad Allah, Mohammed Abd Elhakeem Khalifa
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	SpringerOpen 2021
Materias:	Adenoidectomy Curettage Suction coagulation Diathermy Otorhinolaryngology RF1-547
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/fd2d94899adb4a198ccc4cf4e1003595
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:fd2d94899adb4a198ccc4cf4e1003595
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:fd2d94899adb4a198ccc4cf4e10035952021-11-28T12:06:04ZEvaluation of endoscopic assisted suction coagulation adenoidectomy versus traditional curettage technique10.1186/s43163-021-00173-y1012-55742090-8539https://doaj.org/article/fd2d94899adb4a198ccc4cf4e10035952021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s43163-021-00173-yhttps://doaj.org/toc/1012-5574https://doaj.org/toc/2090-8539Abstract Background Adenoidal hypertrophy is a common condition in children and can cause symptoms such as mouth breathing, nasal discharge, snoring, sleep apnea, and hyponasal speech. The curettage adenoidectomy has some disadvantages, especially the intranasal extension of the adenoid tissue that makes this technique inadequate. This study is conducted to evaluate and compare between assisted suction coagulation adenoidectomy and traditional curettage techniques. Results One hundred twenty-two patients with symptomatic adenoid hypertrophy such as nasal obstruction, snoring, and mouth breathing were included in our study. Patients underwent adenoidectomy either traditional curettage adenoidectomy (60 patients as group A) or endoscopic assisted suction coagulation adenoidectomy (62 patients as group B). Patients were scheduled for follow-up visits with respect to operative time, operative and postoperative complications. The mean age of groups A and B were 6.57+2.8 and 7+2.8 ranging from 3 to12 years. There was a statistically significant difference between groups as regard intraoperative blood loss, trauma, postoperative complications as neck stiffness and bad odor plus postoperative endoscopic and radiological grading after the operation. Conclusions Suction coagulation diathermy adenoidectomy is alternative to cold adenoidectomy with significantly fewer intraoperative complications such as blood loss and trauma of prevertebral muscle plus post-operative complications such as primary or secondary bleeding and rhinolalia aperta.Ayman Ali Abd Elfattah AliMohammed Kamar ElsharnoubyYaser Abd Elwahab KhalilRehab Nour Eldin Mohammad Gad AllahMohammed Abd Elhakeem KhalifaSpringerOpenarticleAdenoidectomyCurettageSuction coagulationDiathermyOtorhinolaryngologyRF1-547ENThe Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology, Vol 37, Iss 1, Pp 1-6 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Adenoidectomy Curettage Suction coagulation Diathermy Otorhinolaryngology RF1-547
spellingShingle	Adenoidectomy Curettage Suction coagulation Diathermy Otorhinolaryngology RF1-547 Ayman Ali Abd Elfattah Ali Mohammed Kamar Elsharnouby Yaser Abd Elwahab Khalil Rehab Nour Eldin Mohammad Gad Allah Mohammed Abd Elhakeem Khalifa Evaluation of endoscopic assisted suction coagulation adenoidectomy versus traditional curettage technique
description	Abstract Background Adenoidal hypertrophy is a common condition in children and can cause symptoms such as mouth breathing, nasal discharge, snoring, sleep apnea, and hyponasal speech. The curettage adenoidectomy has some disadvantages, especially the intranasal extension of the adenoid tissue that makes this technique inadequate. This study is conducted to evaluate and compare between assisted suction coagulation adenoidectomy and traditional curettage techniques. Results One hundred twenty-two patients with symptomatic adenoid hypertrophy such as nasal obstruction, snoring, and mouth breathing were included in our study. Patients underwent adenoidectomy either traditional curettage adenoidectomy (60 patients as group A) or endoscopic assisted suction coagulation adenoidectomy (62 patients as group B). Patients were scheduled for follow-up visits with respect to operative time, operative and postoperative complications. The mean age of groups A and B were 6.57+2.8 and 7+2.8 ranging from 3 to12 years. There was a statistically significant difference between groups as regard intraoperative blood loss, trauma, postoperative complications as neck stiffness and bad odor plus postoperative endoscopic and radiological grading after the operation. Conclusions Suction coagulation diathermy adenoidectomy is alternative to cold adenoidectomy with significantly fewer intraoperative complications such as blood loss and trauma of prevertebral muscle plus post-operative complications such as primary or secondary bleeding and rhinolalia aperta.
format	article
author	Ayman Ali Abd Elfattah Ali Mohammed Kamar Elsharnouby Yaser Abd Elwahab Khalil Rehab Nour Eldin Mohammad Gad Allah Mohammed Abd Elhakeem Khalifa
author_facet	Ayman Ali Abd Elfattah Ali Mohammed Kamar Elsharnouby Yaser Abd Elwahab Khalil Rehab Nour Eldin Mohammad Gad Allah Mohammed Abd Elhakeem Khalifa
author_sort	Ayman Ali Abd Elfattah Ali
title	Evaluation of endoscopic assisted suction coagulation adenoidectomy versus traditional curettage technique
title_short	Evaluation of endoscopic assisted suction coagulation adenoidectomy versus traditional curettage technique
title_full	Evaluation of endoscopic assisted suction coagulation adenoidectomy versus traditional curettage technique
title_fullStr	Evaluation of endoscopic assisted suction coagulation adenoidectomy versus traditional curettage technique
title_full_unstemmed	Evaluation of endoscopic assisted suction coagulation adenoidectomy versus traditional curettage technique
title_sort	evaluation of endoscopic assisted suction coagulation adenoidectomy versus traditional curettage technique
publisher	SpringerOpen
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/fd2d94899adb4a198ccc4cf4e1003595
work_keys_str_mv	AT aymanaliabdelfattahali evaluationofendoscopicassistedsuctioncoagulationadenoidectomyversustraditionalcurettagetechnique AT mohammedkamarelsharnouby evaluationofendoscopicassistedsuctioncoagulationadenoidectomyversustraditionalcurettagetechnique AT yaserabdelwahabkhalil evaluationofendoscopicassistedsuctioncoagulationadenoidectomyversustraditionalcurettagetechnique AT rehabnoureldinmohammadgadallah evaluationofendoscopicassistedsuctioncoagulationadenoidectomyversustraditionalcurettagetechnique AT mohammedabdelhakeemkhalifa evaluationofendoscopicassistedsuctioncoagulationadenoidectomyversustraditionalcurettagetechnique
_version_	1718408236051202048

Evaluation of endoscopic assisted suction coagulation adenoidectomy versus traditional curettage technique

Ejemplares similares