The unreliable influence of multivariate noise normalization on the reliability of neural dissimilarity

Representational similarity analysis (RSA) is a key element in the multivariate pattern analysis toolkit. The central construct of the method is the representational dissimilarity matrix (RDM), which can be generated for datasets from different modalities (neuroimaging, behavior, and computational m...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: J. Brendan Ritchie, Haemy Lee Masson, Stefania Bracci, Hans P. Op de Beeck
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/fd4461ffca8c4e3889cf996e360d3aef
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:fd4461ffca8c4e3889cf996e360d3aef
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:fd4461ffca8c4e3889cf996e360d3aef2021-11-04T04:26:45ZThe unreliable influence of multivariate noise normalization on the reliability of neural dissimilarity1095-957210.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118686https://doaj.org/article/fd4461ffca8c4e3889cf996e360d3aef2021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811921009599https://doaj.org/toc/1095-9572Representational similarity analysis (RSA) is a key element in the multivariate pattern analysis toolkit. The central construct of the method is the representational dissimilarity matrix (RDM), which can be generated for datasets from different modalities (neuroimaging, behavior, and computational models) and directly correlated in order to evaluate their second-order similarity. Given the inherent noisiness of neuroimaging signals it is important to evaluate the reliability of neuroimaging RDMs in order to determine whether these comparisons are meaningful. Recently, multivariate noise normalization (NNM) has been proposed as a widely applicable method for boosting signal estimates for RSA, regardless of choice of dissimilarity metrics, based on evidence that the analysis improves the within-subject reliability of RDMs (Guggenmos et al. 2018; Walther et al. 2016). We revisited this issue with three fMRI datasets and evaluated the impact of NNM on within- and between-subject reliability and RSA effect sizes using multiple dissimilarity metrics. We also assessed its impact across regions of interest from the same dataset, its interaction with spatial smoothing, and compared it to GLMdenoise, which has also been proposed as a method that improves signal estimates for RSA (Charest et al. 2018). We found that across these tests the impact of NNM was highly variable, as also seems to be the case for other analysis choices. Overall, we suggest being conservative before adding steps and complexities to the (pre)processing pipeline for RSA.J. Brendan RitchieHaemy Lee MassonStefania BracciHans P. Op de BeeckElsevierarticleNeurosciences. Biological psychiatry. NeuropsychiatryRC321-571ENNeuroImage, Vol 245, Iss , Pp 118686- (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
RC321-571
spellingShingle Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
RC321-571
J. Brendan Ritchie
Haemy Lee Masson
Stefania Bracci
Hans P. Op de Beeck
The unreliable influence of multivariate noise normalization on the reliability of neural dissimilarity
description Representational similarity analysis (RSA) is a key element in the multivariate pattern analysis toolkit. The central construct of the method is the representational dissimilarity matrix (RDM), which can be generated for datasets from different modalities (neuroimaging, behavior, and computational models) and directly correlated in order to evaluate their second-order similarity. Given the inherent noisiness of neuroimaging signals it is important to evaluate the reliability of neuroimaging RDMs in order to determine whether these comparisons are meaningful. Recently, multivariate noise normalization (NNM) has been proposed as a widely applicable method for boosting signal estimates for RSA, regardless of choice of dissimilarity metrics, based on evidence that the analysis improves the within-subject reliability of RDMs (Guggenmos et al. 2018; Walther et al. 2016). We revisited this issue with three fMRI datasets and evaluated the impact of NNM on within- and between-subject reliability and RSA effect sizes using multiple dissimilarity metrics. We also assessed its impact across regions of interest from the same dataset, its interaction with spatial smoothing, and compared it to GLMdenoise, which has also been proposed as a method that improves signal estimates for RSA (Charest et al. 2018). We found that across these tests the impact of NNM was highly variable, as also seems to be the case for other analysis choices. Overall, we suggest being conservative before adding steps and complexities to the (pre)processing pipeline for RSA.
format article
author J. Brendan Ritchie
Haemy Lee Masson
Stefania Bracci
Hans P. Op de Beeck
author_facet J. Brendan Ritchie
Haemy Lee Masson
Stefania Bracci
Hans P. Op de Beeck
author_sort J. Brendan Ritchie
title The unreliable influence of multivariate noise normalization on the reliability of neural dissimilarity
title_short The unreliable influence of multivariate noise normalization on the reliability of neural dissimilarity
title_full The unreliable influence of multivariate noise normalization on the reliability of neural dissimilarity
title_fullStr The unreliable influence of multivariate noise normalization on the reliability of neural dissimilarity
title_full_unstemmed The unreliable influence of multivariate noise normalization on the reliability of neural dissimilarity
title_sort unreliable influence of multivariate noise normalization on the reliability of neural dissimilarity
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/fd4461ffca8c4e3889cf996e360d3aef
work_keys_str_mv AT jbrendanritchie theunreliableinfluenceofmultivariatenoisenormalizationonthereliabilityofneuraldissimilarity
AT haemyleemasson theunreliableinfluenceofmultivariatenoisenormalizationonthereliabilityofneuraldissimilarity
AT stefaniabracci theunreliableinfluenceofmultivariatenoisenormalizationonthereliabilityofneuraldissimilarity
AT hanspopdebeeck theunreliableinfluenceofmultivariatenoisenormalizationonthereliabilityofneuraldissimilarity
AT jbrendanritchie unreliableinfluenceofmultivariatenoisenormalizationonthereliabilityofneuraldissimilarity
AT haemyleemasson unreliableinfluenceofmultivariatenoisenormalizationonthereliabilityofneuraldissimilarity
AT stefaniabracci unreliableinfluenceofmultivariatenoisenormalizationonthereliabilityofneuraldissimilarity
AT hanspopdebeeck unreliableinfluenceofmultivariatenoisenormalizationonthereliabilityofneuraldissimilarity
_version_ 1718445310049517568