Why it wasn't a great victory after all

<p>On the last day of 2011, President Obama signed a law affirming his power to detain suspected terrorists indefinitely. It is a next strike in an on-going turf war between the Obama Administration and the Supreme Court. A turf war that should have been over in 2008 when a landmark ca...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:

Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal:	Wietse Buijs
Format:	article
Langue:	EN
Publié:	Amsterdam Law Forum 2012
Sujets:	Case Law Terrorism Detainee litigation Guantanamo Supreme Court Law K
Accès en ligne:	https://doaj.org/article/fd5e949e31d541f8a249ed4a5010a73c
Tags:	Ajouter un tag Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:fd5e949e31d541f8a249ed4a5010a73c
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:fd5e949e31d541f8a249ed4a5010a73c2021-12-02T01:09:51ZWhy it wasn't a great victory after all1876-8156https://doaj.org/article/fd5e949e31d541f8a249ed4a5010a73c2012-02-01T00:00:00Zhttp://ojs.ubvu.vu.nl/alf/article/view/254https://doaj.org/toc/1876-8156<p>On the last day of 2011, President Obama signed a law affirming his power to detain suspected terrorists indefinitely. It is a next strike in an on-going turf war between the Obama Administration and the Supreme Court. A turf war that should have been over in 2008 when a landmark case Boumediene v. Bush granted the right to challenge their confinement to the detainees. Except the war wasn't over at all. The Federal Court appointed as the Appellate Court in detainee cases is not keen on implementing the Boumediene precedent at all. An answer from the Supreme Court is expected, but is not given. Why not?</p>Wietse BuijsAmsterdam Law ForumarticleCase LawTerrorismDetainee litigationGuantanamoSupreme CourtLawKENAmsterdam Law Forum, Vol 4, Iss 1, Pp 93-100 (2012)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Case Law Terrorism Detainee litigation Guantanamo Supreme Court Law K
spellingShingle	Case Law Terrorism Detainee litigation Guantanamo Supreme Court Law K Wietse Buijs Why it wasn't a great victory after all
description	<p>On the last day of 2011, President Obama signed a law affirming his power to detain suspected terrorists indefinitely. It is a next strike in an on-going turf war between the Obama Administration and the Supreme Court. A turf war that should have been over in 2008 when a landmark case Boumediene v. Bush granted the right to challenge their confinement to the detainees. Except the war wasn't over at all. The Federal Court appointed as the Appellate Court in detainee cases is not keen on implementing the Boumediene precedent at all. An answer from the Supreme Court is expected, but is not given. Why not?</p>
format	article
author	Wietse Buijs
author_facet	Wietse Buijs
author_sort	Wietse Buijs
title	Why it wasn't a great victory after all
title_short	Why it wasn't a great victory after all
title_full	Why it wasn't a great victory after all
title_fullStr	Why it wasn't a great victory after all
title_full_unstemmed	Why it wasn't a great victory after all
title_sort	why it wasn't a great victory after all
publisher	Amsterdam Law Forum
publishDate	2012
url	https://doaj.org/article/fd5e949e31d541f8a249ed4a5010a73c
work_keys_str_mv	AT wietsebuijs whyitwasntagreatvictoryafterall
_version_	1718403295325716480

Why it wasn't a great victory after all

Documents similaires