On prediction of aided behavioural measures using speech auditory brainstem responses and decision trees.

Current clinical strategies to assess benefits from hearing aids (HAs) are based on self-reported questionnaires and speech-in-noise (SIN) tests; which require behavioural cooperation. Instead, objective measures based on Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABRs) to speech stimuli would not require the in...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Emanuele Perugia, Ghada BinKhamis, Josef Schlittenlacher, Karolina Kluk
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/fd74241d92bb4a37af560b2890b03903
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:fd74241d92bb4a37af560b2890b03903
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:fd74241d92bb4a37af560b2890b039032021-12-02T20:12:59ZOn prediction of aided behavioural measures using speech auditory brainstem responses and decision trees.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0260090https://doaj.org/article/fd74241d92bb4a37af560b2890b039032021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260090https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Current clinical strategies to assess benefits from hearing aids (HAs) are based on self-reported questionnaires and speech-in-noise (SIN) tests; which require behavioural cooperation. Instead, objective measures based on Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABRs) to speech stimuli would not require the individuals' cooperation. Here, we re-analysed an existing dataset to predict behavioural measures with speech-ABRs using regression trees. Ninety-two HA users completed a self-reported questionnaire (SSQ-Speech) and performed two aided SIN tests: sentences in noise (BKB-SIN) and vowel-consonant-vowels (VCV) in noise. Speech-ABRs were evoked by a 40 ms [da] and recorded in 2x2 conditions: aided vs. unaided and quiet vs. background noise. For each recording condition, two sets of features were extracted: 1) amplitudes and latencies of speech-ABR peaks, 2) amplitudes and latencies of speech-ABR F0 encoding. Two regression trees were fitted for each of the three behavioural measures with either feature set and age, digit-span forward and backward, and pure tone average (PTA) as possible predictors. The PTA was the only predictor in the SSQ-Speech trees. In the BKB-SIN trees, performance was predicted by the aided latency of peak F in quiet for participants with PTAs between 43 and 61 dB HL. In the VCV trees, performance was predicted by the aided F0 encoding latency and the aided amplitude of peak VA in quiet for participants with PTAs ≤ 47 dB HL. These findings indicate that PTA was more informative than any speech-ABR measure, as these were relevant only for a subset of the participants. Therefore, speech-ABRs evoked by a 40 ms [da] are not a clinical predictor of behavioural measures in HA users.Emanuele PerugiaGhada BinKhamisJosef SchlittenlacherKarolina KlukPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 11, p e0260090 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Emanuele Perugia
Ghada BinKhamis
Josef Schlittenlacher
Karolina Kluk
On prediction of aided behavioural measures using speech auditory brainstem responses and decision trees.
description Current clinical strategies to assess benefits from hearing aids (HAs) are based on self-reported questionnaires and speech-in-noise (SIN) tests; which require behavioural cooperation. Instead, objective measures based on Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABRs) to speech stimuli would not require the individuals' cooperation. Here, we re-analysed an existing dataset to predict behavioural measures with speech-ABRs using regression trees. Ninety-two HA users completed a self-reported questionnaire (SSQ-Speech) and performed two aided SIN tests: sentences in noise (BKB-SIN) and vowel-consonant-vowels (VCV) in noise. Speech-ABRs were evoked by a 40 ms [da] and recorded in 2x2 conditions: aided vs. unaided and quiet vs. background noise. For each recording condition, two sets of features were extracted: 1) amplitudes and latencies of speech-ABR peaks, 2) amplitudes and latencies of speech-ABR F0 encoding. Two regression trees were fitted for each of the three behavioural measures with either feature set and age, digit-span forward and backward, and pure tone average (PTA) as possible predictors. The PTA was the only predictor in the SSQ-Speech trees. In the BKB-SIN trees, performance was predicted by the aided latency of peak F in quiet for participants with PTAs between 43 and 61 dB HL. In the VCV trees, performance was predicted by the aided F0 encoding latency and the aided amplitude of peak VA in quiet for participants with PTAs ≤ 47 dB HL. These findings indicate that PTA was more informative than any speech-ABR measure, as these were relevant only for a subset of the participants. Therefore, speech-ABRs evoked by a 40 ms [da] are not a clinical predictor of behavioural measures in HA users.
format article
author Emanuele Perugia
Ghada BinKhamis
Josef Schlittenlacher
Karolina Kluk
author_facet Emanuele Perugia
Ghada BinKhamis
Josef Schlittenlacher
Karolina Kluk
author_sort Emanuele Perugia
title On prediction of aided behavioural measures using speech auditory brainstem responses and decision trees.
title_short On prediction of aided behavioural measures using speech auditory brainstem responses and decision trees.
title_full On prediction of aided behavioural measures using speech auditory brainstem responses and decision trees.
title_fullStr On prediction of aided behavioural measures using speech auditory brainstem responses and decision trees.
title_full_unstemmed On prediction of aided behavioural measures using speech auditory brainstem responses and decision trees.
title_sort on prediction of aided behavioural measures using speech auditory brainstem responses and decision trees.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/fd74241d92bb4a37af560b2890b03903
work_keys_str_mv AT emanueleperugia onpredictionofaidedbehaviouralmeasuresusingspeechauditorybrainstemresponsesanddecisiontrees
AT ghadabinkhamis onpredictionofaidedbehaviouralmeasuresusingspeechauditorybrainstemresponsesanddecisiontrees
AT josefschlittenlacher onpredictionofaidedbehaviouralmeasuresusingspeechauditorybrainstemresponsesanddecisiontrees
AT karolinakluk onpredictionofaidedbehaviouralmeasuresusingspeechauditorybrainstemresponsesanddecisiontrees
_version_ 1718374862436696064