In Defence of "Belief": A Cognitive Response to Behaviourism, Eliminativism, and Social Constructivism
Kognitivna istraživanja religije pokušavaju da objasne religijska uverenja. Ipak, mnogi antropolozi, psiholozi i filozofi kritikuju koncepte "vere" ili "uverenja" kao takve. Osnovne kritike sastoje se u tome da se "uverenje" ne može posmatrati, da ne postoji, i da je sa...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN FR SR |
Publicado: |
University of Belgrade
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/fd7fbe83028045dbbfd495bc4c11ab09 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:fd7fbe83028045dbbfd495bc4c11ab09 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:fd7fbe83028045dbbfd495bc4c11ab092021-12-02T00:15:43ZIn Defence of "Belief": A Cognitive Response to Behaviourism, Eliminativism, and Social Constructivism0353-15892334-8801https://doaj.org/article/fd7fbe83028045dbbfd495bc4c11ab092016-03-01T00:00:00Zhttp://eap-iea.org/index.php/eap/article/view/499https://doaj.org/toc/0353-1589https://doaj.org/toc/2334-8801Kognitivna istraživanja religije pokušavaju da objasne religijska uverenja. Ipak, mnogi antropolozi, psiholozi i filozofi kritikuju koncepte "vere" ili "uverenja" kao takve. Osnovne kritike sastoje se u tome da se "uverenje" ne može posmatrati, da ne postoji, i da je sam termin zapadnjački konstrukt neupotrebljiv za poređenje. Ove kritike mogu da učine da "nauka o verovanju" deluje naivno i pogrešno. Oslanjajući se na kognitivnu nauku, i filozofski funckionalizam koji joj je u osnovi, ponudiću minimalnu definiciju verovanja koja omogućuje nauci koja se time bavi da odoli ovim kritikama.Jonathan A. LanmanUniversity of BelgradearticleAnthropologyGN1-890ENFRSREtnoantropološki Problemi, Vol 3, Iss 3, Pp 49-62 (2016) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN FR SR |
topic |
Anthropology GN1-890 |
spellingShingle |
Anthropology GN1-890 Jonathan A. Lanman In Defence of "Belief": A Cognitive Response to Behaviourism, Eliminativism, and Social Constructivism |
description |
Kognitivna istraživanja religije pokušavaju da objasne religijska uverenja. Ipak, mnogi antropolozi, psiholozi i filozofi kritikuju koncepte "vere" ili "uverenja" kao takve. Osnovne kritike sastoje se u tome da se "uverenje" ne može posmatrati, da ne postoji, i da je sam termin zapadnjački konstrukt neupotrebljiv za poređenje. Ove kritike mogu da učine da "nauka o verovanju" deluje naivno i pogrešno. Oslanjajući se na kognitivnu nauku, i filozofski funckionalizam koji joj je u osnovi, ponudiću minimalnu definiciju verovanja koja omogućuje nauci koja se time bavi da odoli ovim kritikama. |
format |
article |
author |
Jonathan A. Lanman |
author_facet |
Jonathan A. Lanman |
author_sort |
Jonathan A. Lanman |
title |
In Defence of "Belief": A Cognitive Response to Behaviourism, Eliminativism, and Social Constructivism |
title_short |
In Defence of "Belief": A Cognitive Response to Behaviourism, Eliminativism, and Social Constructivism |
title_full |
In Defence of "Belief": A Cognitive Response to Behaviourism, Eliminativism, and Social Constructivism |
title_fullStr |
In Defence of "Belief": A Cognitive Response to Behaviourism, Eliminativism, and Social Constructivism |
title_full_unstemmed |
In Defence of "Belief": A Cognitive Response to Behaviourism, Eliminativism, and Social Constructivism |
title_sort |
in defence of "belief": a cognitive response to behaviourism, eliminativism, and social constructivism |
publisher |
University of Belgrade |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/fd7fbe83028045dbbfd495bc4c11ab09 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jonathanalanman indefenceofbeliefacognitiveresponsetobehaviourismeliminativismandsocialconstructivism |
_version_ |
1718403901402644480 |