Fiji 2000: Journalists and the George Speight coup

Much criticism of both the local and international media’s role during the May 2000 coup in Fiji emerged after the crisis. Critics included editors and journalists of the local and international media and political and historical analysts who knew the ‘real reasons’ behind the coup and did not see...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Christine Gounder
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Asia Pacific Network 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/fd8b707065504b5a82f5b60b8e367688
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:fd8b707065504b5a82f5b60b8e367688
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:fd8b707065504b5a82f5b60b8e3676882021-12-02T08:57:10ZFiji 2000: Journalists and the George Speight coup10.24135/pjr.v13i1.8881023-94992324-2035https://doaj.org/article/fd8b707065504b5a82f5b60b8e3676882007-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pacific-journalism-review/article/view/888https://doaj.org/toc/1023-9499https://doaj.org/toc/2324-2035 Much criticism of both the local and international media’s role during the May 2000 coup in Fiji emerged after the crisis. Critics included editors and journalists of the local and international media and political and historical analysts who knew the ‘real reasons’ behind the coup and did not see this being reported. This article analyses interviews with 17 journalists, 13 local four foreign reporters, who covered the coup, and their reaction to criticisms made against them over coverage. It also assesses possible effects on some journalists by the so-called Stockholm syndrome because of their close association with businessman George Speight and his fellow captors who held the Mahendra Chaudhry government hostage for 56 days. Christine GounderAsia Pacific Networkarticleconflict reportingFiji coupsGeorge Speightmedia ethicsmedia historyStockholm SyndromeCommunication. Mass mediaP87-96Journalism. The periodical press, etc.PN4699-5650ENPacific Journalism Review, Vol 13, Iss 1 (2007)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic conflict reporting
Fiji coups
George Speight
media ethics
media history
Stockholm Syndrome
Communication. Mass media
P87-96
Journalism. The periodical press, etc.
PN4699-5650
spellingShingle conflict reporting
Fiji coups
George Speight
media ethics
media history
Stockholm Syndrome
Communication. Mass media
P87-96
Journalism. The periodical press, etc.
PN4699-5650
Christine Gounder
Fiji 2000: Journalists and the George Speight coup
description Much criticism of both the local and international media’s role during the May 2000 coup in Fiji emerged after the crisis. Critics included editors and journalists of the local and international media and political and historical analysts who knew the ‘real reasons’ behind the coup and did not see this being reported. This article analyses interviews with 17 journalists, 13 local four foreign reporters, who covered the coup, and their reaction to criticisms made against them over coverage. It also assesses possible effects on some journalists by the so-called Stockholm syndrome because of their close association with businessman George Speight and his fellow captors who held the Mahendra Chaudhry government hostage for 56 days.
format article
author Christine Gounder
author_facet Christine Gounder
author_sort Christine Gounder
title Fiji 2000: Journalists and the George Speight coup
title_short Fiji 2000: Journalists and the George Speight coup
title_full Fiji 2000: Journalists and the George Speight coup
title_fullStr Fiji 2000: Journalists and the George Speight coup
title_full_unstemmed Fiji 2000: Journalists and the George Speight coup
title_sort fiji 2000: journalists and the george speight coup
publisher Asia Pacific Network
publishDate 2007
url https://doaj.org/article/fd8b707065504b5a82f5b60b8e367688
work_keys_str_mv AT christinegounder fiji2000journalistsandthegeorgespeightcoup
_version_ 1718398342116933632