The influence of age on health valuations: the older olds prefer functional independence while the younger olds prefer less morbidity
Cynthia S Hofman,1,2 Peter Makai,1 Han Boter,3 Bianca M Buurman,4 Anton J de Craen,5 Marcel GM Olde Rikkert,1 Rogier Donders,2 René JF Melis1 1Department of Geriatric Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; 2Department for Health Evidence, Radboud Universi...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/fd93c695791441a59d92e38f70b0ee4c |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:fd93c695791441a59d92e38f70b0ee4c |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:fd93c695791441a59d92e38f70b0ee4c2021-12-02T01:59:02ZThe influence of age on health valuations: the older olds prefer functional independence while the younger olds prefer less morbidity1178-1998https://doaj.org/article/fd93c695791441a59d92e38f70b0ee4c2015-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/the-influence-of-age-on-health-valuations-the-older-olds-prefer-functi-peer-reviewed-article-CIAhttps://doaj.org/toc/1178-1998Cynthia S Hofman,1,2 Peter Makai,1 Han Boter,3 Bianca M Buurman,4 Anton J de Craen,5 Marcel GM Olde Rikkert,1 Rogier Donders,2 René JF Melis1 1Department of Geriatric Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; 2Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; 3Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; 4Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; 5Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands Background: To assess the effectiveness of geriatric interventions, The Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey – Composite Endpoint (TOPICS-CEP) has been developed based on health valuations of older persons and informal caregivers. This study explored the influence of the raters’ age on the preference weights of TOPICS-CEP’s components.Methods: A vignette study was conducted with 200 raters (mean age ± standard deviation: 72.5±11.8 years; 66.5% female). Profiles of older persons were used to obtain the preference weights for all TOPICS-CEP components: morbidity, functional limitations, emotional wellbeing, pain experience, cognitive functioning, social functioning, self-perceived health, and self-perceived quality of life. The raters assessed the general wellbeing of these vignettes on a 0–10 scale. Mixed linear regression analysis with interaction terms was used to explore the effects of raters’ age on the preference weights.Results: Interaction effects between age and the TOPICS-CEP components showed that older raters gave significantly (P<0.05) more weight to functional limitations and social functioning and less to morbidities and pain experience, compared to younger raters.Conclusion: Researchers examining effectiveness in elderly care need to consider the discrepancies between health valuations of younger olds and older olds when selecting or establishing outcome measures. In clinical decision making, health care professionals need to be aware of this discrepancy as well. For this reason we highly recommend shared decision making in geriatric care. Keywords: general wellbeing, preferences, valuation, domains, composite endpoint, age Hofman CSMakai PBoter HBuurman BMde Craen AJOlde Rikkert MGMDonders RMelis RJFDove Medical PressarticleGeneral wellbeingpreferencesvaluationdomainscomposite endpointageGeriatricsRC952-954.6ENClinical Interventions in Aging, Vol Volume 10, Pp 1131-1139 (2015) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
General wellbeing preferences valuation domains composite endpoint age Geriatrics RC952-954.6 |
spellingShingle |
General wellbeing preferences valuation domains composite endpoint age Geriatrics RC952-954.6 Hofman CS Makai P Boter H Buurman BM de Craen AJ Olde Rikkert MGM Donders R Melis RJF The influence of age on health valuations: the older olds prefer functional independence while the younger olds prefer less morbidity |
description |
Cynthia S Hofman,1,2 Peter Makai,1 Han Boter,3 Bianca M Buurman,4 Anton J de Craen,5 Marcel GM Olde Rikkert,1 Rogier Donders,2 René JF Melis1 1Department of Geriatric Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; 2Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; 3Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; 4Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; 5Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands Background: To assess the effectiveness of geriatric interventions, The Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey – Composite Endpoint (TOPICS-CEP) has been developed based on health valuations of older persons and informal caregivers. This study explored the influence of the raters’ age on the preference weights of TOPICS-CEP’s components.Methods: A vignette study was conducted with 200 raters (mean age ± standard deviation: 72.5±11.8 years; 66.5% female). Profiles of older persons were used to obtain the preference weights for all TOPICS-CEP components: morbidity, functional limitations, emotional wellbeing, pain experience, cognitive functioning, social functioning, self-perceived health, and self-perceived quality of life. The raters assessed the general wellbeing of these vignettes on a 0–10 scale. Mixed linear regression analysis with interaction terms was used to explore the effects of raters’ age on the preference weights.Results: Interaction effects between age and the TOPICS-CEP components showed that older raters gave significantly (P<0.05) more weight to functional limitations and social functioning and less to morbidities and pain experience, compared to younger raters.Conclusion: Researchers examining effectiveness in elderly care need to consider the discrepancies between health valuations of younger olds and older olds when selecting or establishing outcome measures. In clinical decision making, health care professionals need to be aware of this discrepancy as well. For this reason we highly recommend shared decision making in geriatric care. Keywords: general wellbeing, preferences, valuation, domains, composite endpoint, age |
format |
article |
author |
Hofman CS Makai P Boter H Buurman BM de Craen AJ Olde Rikkert MGM Donders R Melis RJF |
author_facet |
Hofman CS Makai P Boter H Buurman BM de Craen AJ Olde Rikkert MGM Donders R Melis RJF |
author_sort |
Hofman CS |
title |
The influence of age on health valuations: the older olds prefer functional independence while the younger olds prefer less morbidity |
title_short |
The influence of age on health valuations: the older olds prefer functional independence while the younger olds prefer less morbidity |
title_full |
The influence of age on health valuations: the older olds prefer functional independence while the younger olds prefer less morbidity |
title_fullStr |
The influence of age on health valuations: the older olds prefer functional independence while the younger olds prefer less morbidity |
title_full_unstemmed |
The influence of age on health valuations: the older olds prefer functional independence while the younger olds prefer less morbidity |
title_sort |
influence of age on health valuations: the older olds prefer functional independence while the younger olds prefer less morbidity |
publisher |
Dove Medical Press |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/fd93c695791441a59d92e38f70b0ee4c |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hofmancs theinfluenceofageonhealthvaluationstheolderoldspreferfunctionalindependencewhiletheyoungeroldspreferlessmorbidity AT makaip theinfluenceofageonhealthvaluationstheolderoldspreferfunctionalindependencewhiletheyoungeroldspreferlessmorbidity AT boterh theinfluenceofageonhealthvaluationstheolderoldspreferfunctionalindependencewhiletheyoungeroldspreferlessmorbidity AT buurmanbm theinfluenceofageonhealthvaluationstheolderoldspreferfunctionalindependencewhiletheyoungeroldspreferlessmorbidity AT decraenaj theinfluenceofageonhealthvaluationstheolderoldspreferfunctionalindependencewhiletheyoungeroldspreferlessmorbidity AT olderikkertmgm theinfluenceofageonhealthvaluationstheolderoldspreferfunctionalindependencewhiletheyoungeroldspreferlessmorbidity AT dondersr theinfluenceofageonhealthvaluationstheolderoldspreferfunctionalindependencewhiletheyoungeroldspreferlessmorbidity AT melisrjf theinfluenceofageonhealthvaluationstheolderoldspreferfunctionalindependencewhiletheyoungeroldspreferlessmorbidity AT hofmancs influenceofageonhealthvaluationstheolderoldspreferfunctionalindependencewhiletheyoungeroldspreferlessmorbidity AT makaip influenceofageonhealthvaluationstheolderoldspreferfunctionalindependencewhiletheyoungeroldspreferlessmorbidity AT boterh influenceofageonhealthvaluationstheolderoldspreferfunctionalindependencewhiletheyoungeroldspreferlessmorbidity AT buurmanbm influenceofageonhealthvaluationstheolderoldspreferfunctionalindependencewhiletheyoungeroldspreferlessmorbidity AT decraenaj influenceofageonhealthvaluationstheolderoldspreferfunctionalindependencewhiletheyoungeroldspreferlessmorbidity AT olderikkertmgm influenceofageonhealthvaluationstheolderoldspreferfunctionalindependencewhiletheyoungeroldspreferlessmorbidity AT dondersr influenceofageonhealthvaluationstheolderoldspreferfunctionalindependencewhiletheyoungeroldspreferlessmorbidity AT melisrjf influenceofageonhealthvaluationstheolderoldspreferfunctionalindependencewhiletheyoungeroldspreferlessmorbidity |
_version_ |
1718402812786769920 |