The influence of age on health valuations: the older olds prefer functional independence while the younger olds prefer less morbidity

Cynthia S Hofman,1,2 Peter Makai,1 Han Boter,3 Bianca M Buurman,4 Anton J de Craen,5 Marcel GM Olde Rikkert,1 Rogier Donders,2 René JF Melis1 1Department of Geriatric Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; 2Department for Health Evidence, Radboud Universi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hofman CS, Makai P, Boter H, Buurman BM, de Craen AJ, Olde Rikkert MGM, Donders R, Melis RJF
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
age
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/fd93c695791441a59d92e38f70b0ee4c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:fd93c695791441a59d92e38f70b0ee4c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:fd93c695791441a59d92e38f70b0ee4c2021-12-02T01:59:02ZThe influence of age on health valuations: the older olds prefer functional independence while the younger olds prefer less morbidity1178-1998https://doaj.org/article/fd93c695791441a59d92e38f70b0ee4c2015-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/the-influence-of-age-on-health-valuations-the-older-olds-prefer-functi-peer-reviewed-article-CIAhttps://doaj.org/toc/1178-1998Cynthia S Hofman,1,2 Peter Makai,1 Han Boter,3 Bianca M Buurman,4 Anton J de Craen,5 Marcel GM Olde Rikkert,1 Rogier Donders,2 René JF Melis1 1Department of Geriatric Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; 2Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; 3Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; 4Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; 5Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands Background: To assess the effectiveness of geriatric interventions, The Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey – Composite Endpoint (TOPICS-CEP) has been developed based on health valuations of older persons and informal caregivers. This study explored the influence of the raters’ age on the preference weights of TOPICS-CEP’s components.Methods: A vignette study was conducted with 200 raters (mean age ± standard deviation: 72.5±11.8 years; 66.5% female). Profiles of older persons were used to obtain the preference weights for all TOPICS-CEP components: morbidity, functional limitations, emotional wellbeing, pain experience, cognitive functioning, social functioning, self-perceived health, and self-perceived quality of life. The raters assessed the general wellbeing of these vignettes on a 0–10 scale. Mixed linear regression analysis with interaction terms was used to explore the effects of raters’ age on the preference weights.Results: Interaction effects between age and the TOPICS-CEP components showed that older raters gave significantly (P<0.05) more weight to functional limitations and social functioning and less to morbidities and pain experience, compared to younger raters.Conclusion: Researchers examining effectiveness in elderly care need to consider the discrepancies between health valuations of younger olds and older olds when selecting or establishing outcome measures. In clinical decision making, health care professionals need to be aware of this discrepancy as well. For this reason we highly recommend shared decision making in geriatric care. Keywords: general wellbeing, preferences, valuation, domains, composite endpoint, age Hofman CSMakai PBoter HBuurman BMde Craen AJOlde Rikkert MGMDonders RMelis RJFDove Medical PressarticleGeneral wellbeingpreferencesvaluationdomainscomposite endpointageGeriatricsRC952-954.6ENClinical Interventions in Aging, Vol Volume 10, Pp 1131-1139 (2015)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic General wellbeing
preferences
valuation
domains
composite endpoint
age
Geriatrics
RC952-954.6
spellingShingle General wellbeing
preferences
valuation
domains
composite endpoint
age
Geriatrics
RC952-954.6
Hofman CS
Makai P
Boter H
Buurman BM
de Craen AJ
Olde Rikkert MGM
Donders R
Melis RJF
The influence of age on health valuations: the older olds prefer functional independence while the younger olds prefer less morbidity
description Cynthia S Hofman,1,2 Peter Makai,1 Han Boter,3 Bianca M Buurman,4 Anton J de Craen,5 Marcel GM Olde Rikkert,1 Rogier Donders,2 René JF Melis1 1Department of Geriatric Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; 2Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; 3Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; 4Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; 5Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands Background: To assess the effectiveness of geriatric interventions, The Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey – Composite Endpoint (TOPICS-CEP) has been developed based on health valuations of older persons and informal caregivers. This study explored the influence of the raters’ age on the preference weights of TOPICS-CEP’s components.Methods: A vignette study was conducted with 200 raters (mean age ± standard deviation: 72.5±11.8 years; 66.5% female). Profiles of older persons were used to obtain the preference weights for all TOPICS-CEP components: morbidity, functional limitations, emotional wellbeing, pain experience, cognitive functioning, social functioning, self-perceived health, and self-perceived quality of life. The raters assessed the general wellbeing of these vignettes on a 0–10 scale. Mixed linear regression analysis with interaction terms was used to explore the effects of raters’ age on the preference weights.Results: Interaction effects between age and the TOPICS-CEP components showed that older raters gave significantly (P<0.05) more weight to functional limitations and social functioning and less to morbidities and pain experience, compared to younger raters.Conclusion: Researchers examining effectiveness in elderly care need to consider the discrepancies between health valuations of younger olds and older olds when selecting or establishing outcome measures. In clinical decision making, health care professionals need to be aware of this discrepancy as well. For this reason we highly recommend shared decision making in geriatric care. Keywords: general wellbeing, preferences, valuation, domains, composite endpoint, age 
format article
author Hofman CS
Makai P
Boter H
Buurman BM
de Craen AJ
Olde Rikkert MGM
Donders R
Melis RJF
author_facet Hofman CS
Makai P
Boter H
Buurman BM
de Craen AJ
Olde Rikkert MGM
Donders R
Melis RJF
author_sort Hofman CS
title The influence of age on health valuations: the older olds prefer functional independence while the younger olds prefer less morbidity
title_short The influence of age on health valuations: the older olds prefer functional independence while the younger olds prefer less morbidity
title_full The influence of age on health valuations: the older olds prefer functional independence while the younger olds prefer less morbidity
title_fullStr The influence of age on health valuations: the older olds prefer functional independence while the younger olds prefer less morbidity
title_full_unstemmed The influence of age on health valuations: the older olds prefer functional independence while the younger olds prefer less morbidity
title_sort influence of age on health valuations: the older olds prefer functional independence while the younger olds prefer less morbidity
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2015
url https://doaj.org/article/fd93c695791441a59d92e38f70b0ee4c
work_keys_str_mv AT hofmancs theinfluenceofageonhealthvaluationstheolderoldspreferfunctionalindependencewhiletheyoungeroldspreferlessmorbidity
AT makaip theinfluenceofageonhealthvaluationstheolderoldspreferfunctionalindependencewhiletheyoungeroldspreferlessmorbidity
AT boterh theinfluenceofageonhealthvaluationstheolderoldspreferfunctionalindependencewhiletheyoungeroldspreferlessmorbidity
AT buurmanbm theinfluenceofageonhealthvaluationstheolderoldspreferfunctionalindependencewhiletheyoungeroldspreferlessmorbidity
AT decraenaj theinfluenceofageonhealthvaluationstheolderoldspreferfunctionalindependencewhiletheyoungeroldspreferlessmorbidity
AT olderikkertmgm theinfluenceofageonhealthvaluationstheolderoldspreferfunctionalindependencewhiletheyoungeroldspreferlessmorbidity
AT dondersr theinfluenceofageonhealthvaluationstheolderoldspreferfunctionalindependencewhiletheyoungeroldspreferlessmorbidity
AT melisrjf theinfluenceofageonhealthvaluationstheolderoldspreferfunctionalindependencewhiletheyoungeroldspreferlessmorbidity
AT hofmancs influenceofageonhealthvaluationstheolderoldspreferfunctionalindependencewhiletheyoungeroldspreferlessmorbidity
AT makaip influenceofageonhealthvaluationstheolderoldspreferfunctionalindependencewhiletheyoungeroldspreferlessmorbidity
AT boterh influenceofageonhealthvaluationstheolderoldspreferfunctionalindependencewhiletheyoungeroldspreferlessmorbidity
AT buurmanbm influenceofageonhealthvaluationstheolderoldspreferfunctionalindependencewhiletheyoungeroldspreferlessmorbidity
AT decraenaj influenceofageonhealthvaluationstheolderoldspreferfunctionalindependencewhiletheyoungeroldspreferlessmorbidity
AT olderikkertmgm influenceofageonhealthvaluationstheolderoldspreferfunctionalindependencewhiletheyoungeroldspreferlessmorbidity
AT dondersr influenceofageonhealthvaluationstheolderoldspreferfunctionalindependencewhiletheyoungeroldspreferlessmorbidity
AT melisrjf influenceofageonhealthvaluationstheolderoldspreferfunctionalindependencewhiletheyoungeroldspreferlessmorbidity
_version_ 1718402812786769920