The reliability and validity of DSM 5 diagnostic criteria for neurocognitive disorder and relationship with plasma neurofilament light in a down syndrome population
Abstract The validity of dementia diagnostic criteria depends on their ability to distinguish dementia symptoms from pre-existing cognitive impairments. The study aimed to assess inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity of DSM-5 criteria for neurocognitive disorder in Down syndrome. The utili...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/fd96eaea78ba49ceb19d5f682329bcbe |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:fd96eaea78ba49ceb19d5f682329bcbe |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:fd96eaea78ba49ceb19d5f682329bcbe2021-12-02T16:10:36ZThe reliability and validity of DSM 5 diagnostic criteria for neurocognitive disorder and relationship with plasma neurofilament light in a down syndrome population10.1038/s41598-021-92887-52045-2322https://doaj.org/article/fd96eaea78ba49ceb19d5f682329bcbe2021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92887-5https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The validity of dementia diagnostic criteria depends on their ability to distinguish dementia symptoms from pre-existing cognitive impairments. The study aimed to assess inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity of DSM-5 criteria for neurocognitive disorder in Down syndrome. The utility of mild neurocognitive disorder as a distinct diagnostic category, and the association between clinical symptoms and neurodegenerative changes represented by the plasma biomarker neurofilament light were also examined. 165 adults with Down syndrome were included. Two clinicians independently applied clinical judgement, DSM-IV, ICD-10 and DSM-5 criteria for dementia (or neurocognitive disorder) to each case. Inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity were analysed using the kappa statistic. Plasma neurofilament light concentrations were measured for 55 participants as a marker of neurodegeneration and between group comparisons calculated. All diagnostic criteria showed good inter-rater reliability apart from mild neurocognitive disorder which was moderate (k = 0.494). DSM- 5 criteria had substantial concurrence with clinical judgement (k = 0.855). When compared to the no neurocognitive disorder group, average neurofilament light concentrations were higher in both the mild and major neurocognitive disorder groups. DSM-5 neurocognitive disorder criteria can be used reliably in a Down syndrome population and has higher concurrence with clinical judgement than the older DSM-IV and ICD-10 criteria. Whilst the inter-rater reliability of the mild neurocognitive disorder criteria was modest, it does appear to identify people in an early stage of dementia with underlying neurodegenerative changes, represented by higher average NfL levels.Sarah E. PapeTamara al JanabiNicholas J. AshtonAbdul HyeRory SheehanPaul GallagherBernice KnightAnne-Marije PrinsKen CourtenayVesna JordanovaBini ThomasNagarajan PerumalCraig ForbesAngela HassiotisAndre StrydomNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Sarah E. Pape Tamara al Janabi Nicholas J. Ashton Abdul Hye Rory Sheehan Paul Gallagher Bernice Knight Anne-Marije Prins Ken Courtenay Vesna Jordanova Bini Thomas Nagarajan Perumal Craig Forbes Angela Hassiotis Andre Strydom The reliability and validity of DSM 5 diagnostic criteria for neurocognitive disorder and relationship with plasma neurofilament light in a down syndrome population |
description |
Abstract The validity of dementia diagnostic criteria depends on their ability to distinguish dementia symptoms from pre-existing cognitive impairments. The study aimed to assess inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity of DSM-5 criteria for neurocognitive disorder in Down syndrome. The utility of mild neurocognitive disorder as a distinct diagnostic category, and the association between clinical symptoms and neurodegenerative changes represented by the plasma biomarker neurofilament light were also examined. 165 adults with Down syndrome were included. Two clinicians independently applied clinical judgement, DSM-IV, ICD-10 and DSM-5 criteria for dementia (or neurocognitive disorder) to each case. Inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity were analysed using the kappa statistic. Plasma neurofilament light concentrations were measured for 55 participants as a marker of neurodegeneration and between group comparisons calculated. All diagnostic criteria showed good inter-rater reliability apart from mild neurocognitive disorder which was moderate (k = 0.494). DSM- 5 criteria had substantial concurrence with clinical judgement (k = 0.855). When compared to the no neurocognitive disorder group, average neurofilament light concentrations were higher in both the mild and major neurocognitive disorder groups. DSM-5 neurocognitive disorder criteria can be used reliably in a Down syndrome population and has higher concurrence with clinical judgement than the older DSM-IV and ICD-10 criteria. Whilst the inter-rater reliability of the mild neurocognitive disorder criteria was modest, it does appear to identify people in an early stage of dementia with underlying neurodegenerative changes, represented by higher average NfL levels. |
format |
article |
author |
Sarah E. Pape Tamara al Janabi Nicholas J. Ashton Abdul Hye Rory Sheehan Paul Gallagher Bernice Knight Anne-Marije Prins Ken Courtenay Vesna Jordanova Bini Thomas Nagarajan Perumal Craig Forbes Angela Hassiotis Andre Strydom |
author_facet |
Sarah E. Pape Tamara al Janabi Nicholas J. Ashton Abdul Hye Rory Sheehan Paul Gallagher Bernice Knight Anne-Marije Prins Ken Courtenay Vesna Jordanova Bini Thomas Nagarajan Perumal Craig Forbes Angela Hassiotis Andre Strydom |
author_sort |
Sarah E. Pape |
title |
The reliability and validity of DSM 5 diagnostic criteria for neurocognitive disorder and relationship with plasma neurofilament light in a down syndrome population |
title_short |
The reliability and validity of DSM 5 diagnostic criteria for neurocognitive disorder and relationship with plasma neurofilament light in a down syndrome population |
title_full |
The reliability and validity of DSM 5 diagnostic criteria for neurocognitive disorder and relationship with plasma neurofilament light in a down syndrome population |
title_fullStr |
The reliability and validity of DSM 5 diagnostic criteria for neurocognitive disorder and relationship with plasma neurofilament light in a down syndrome population |
title_full_unstemmed |
The reliability and validity of DSM 5 diagnostic criteria for neurocognitive disorder and relationship with plasma neurofilament light in a down syndrome population |
title_sort |
reliability and validity of dsm 5 diagnostic criteria for neurocognitive disorder and relationship with plasma neurofilament light in a down syndrome population |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/fd96eaea78ba49ceb19d5f682329bcbe |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sarahepape thereliabilityandvalidityofdsm5diagnosticcriteriaforneurocognitivedisorderandrelationshipwithplasmaneurofilamentlightinadownsyndromepopulation AT tamaraaljanabi thereliabilityandvalidityofdsm5diagnosticcriteriaforneurocognitivedisorderandrelationshipwithplasmaneurofilamentlightinadownsyndromepopulation AT nicholasjashton thereliabilityandvalidityofdsm5diagnosticcriteriaforneurocognitivedisorderandrelationshipwithplasmaneurofilamentlightinadownsyndromepopulation AT abdulhye thereliabilityandvalidityofdsm5diagnosticcriteriaforneurocognitivedisorderandrelationshipwithplasmaneurofilamentlightinadownsyndromepopulation AT rorysheehan thereliabilityandvalidityofdsm5diagnosticcriteriaforneurocognitivedisorderandrelationshipwithplasmaneurofilamentlightinadownsyndromepopulation AT paulgallagher thereliabilityandvalidityofdsm5diagnosticcriteriaforneurocognitivedisorderandrelationshipwithplasmaneurofilamentlightinadownsyndromepopulation AT berniceknight thereliabilityandvalidityofdsm5diagnosticcriteriaforneurocognitivedisorderandrelationshipwithplasmaneurofilamentlightinadownsyndromepopulation AT annemarijeprins thereliabilityandvalidityofdsm5diagnosticcriteriaforneurocognitivedisorderandrelationshipwithplasmaneurofilamentlightinadownsyndromepopulation AT kencourtenay thereliabilityandvalidityofdsm5diagnosticcriteriaforneurocognitivedisorderandrelationshipwithplasmaneurofilamentlightinadownsyndromepopulation AT vesnajordanova thereliabilityandvalidityofdsm5diagnosticcriteriaforneurocognitivedisorderandrelationshipwithplasmaneurofilamentlightinadownsyndromepopulation AT binithomas thereliabilityandvalidityofdsm5diagnosticcriteriaforneurocognitivedisorderandrelationshipwithplasmaneurofilamentlightinadownsyndromepopulation AT nagarajanperumal thereliabilityandvalidityofdsm5diagnosticcriteriaforneurocognitivedisorderandrelationshipwithplasmaneurofilamentlightinadownsyndromepopulation AT craigforbes thereliabilityandvalidityofdsm5diagnosticcriteriaforneurocognitivedisorderandrelationshipwithplasmaneurofilamentlightinadownsyndromepopulation AT angelahassiotis thereliabilityandvalidityofdsm5diagnosticcriteriaforneurocognitivedisorderandrelationshipwithplasmaneurofilamentlightinadownsyndromepopulation AT andrestrydom thereliabilityandvalidityofdsm5diagnosticcriteriaforneurocognitivedisorderandrelationshipwithplasmaneurofilamentlightinadownsyndromepopulation AT sarahepape reliabilityandvalidityofdsm5diagnosticcriteriaforneurocognitivedisorderandrelationshipwithplasmaneurofilamentlightinadownsyndromepopulation AT tamaraaljanabi reliabilityandvalidityofdsm5diagnosticcriteriaforneurocognitivedisorderandrelationshipwithplasmaneurofilamentlightinadownsyndromepopulation AT nicholasjashton reliabilityandvalidityofdsm5diagnosticcriteriaforneurocognitivedisorderandrelationshipwithplasmaneurofilamentlightinadownsyndromepopulation AT abdulhye reliabilityandvalidityofdsm5diagnosticcriteriaforneurocognitivedisorderandrelationshipwithplasmaneurofilamentlightinadownsyndromepopulation AT rorysheehan reliabilityandvalidityofdsm5diagnosticcriteriaforneurocognitivedisorderandrelationshipwithplasmaneurofilamentlightinadownsyndromepopulation AT paulgallagher reliabilityandvalidityofdsm5diagnosticcriteriaforneurocognitivedisorderandrelationshipwithplasmaneurofilamentlightinadownsyndromepopulation AT berniceknight reliabilityandvalidityofdsm5diagnosticcriteriaforneurocognitivedisorderandrelationshipwithplasmaneurofilamentlightinadownsyndromepopulation AT annemarijeprins reliabilityandvalidityofdsm5diagnosticcriteriaforneurocognitivedisorderandrelationshipwithplasmaneurofilamentlightinadownsyndromepopulation AT kencourtenay reliabilityandvalidityofdsm5diagnosticcriteriaforneurocognitivedisorderandrelationshipwithplasmaneurofilamentlightinadownsyndromepopulation AT vesnajordanova reliabilityandvalidityofdsm5diagnosticcriteriaforneurocognitivedisorderandrelationshipwithplasmaneurofilamentlightinadownsyndromepopulation AT binithomas reliabilityandvalidityofdsm5diagnosticcriteriaforneurocognitivedisorderandrelationshipwithplasmaneurofilamentlightinadownsyndromepopulation AT nagarajanperumal reliabilityandvalidityofdsm5diagnosticcriteriaforneurocognitivedisorderandrelationshipwithplasmaneurofilamentlightinadownsyndromepopulation AT craigforbes reliabilityandvalidityofdsm5diagnosticcriteriaforneurocognitivedisorderandrelationshipwithplasmaneurofilamentlightinadownsyndromepopulation AT angelahassiotis reliabilityandvalidityofdsm5diagnosticcriteriaforneurocognitivedisorderandrelationshipwithplasmaneurofilamentlightinadownsyndromepopulation AT andrestrydom reliabilityandvalidityofdsm5diagnosticcriteriaforneurocognitivedisorderandrelationshipwithplasmaneurofilamentlightinadownsyndromepopulation |
_version_ |
1718384449737981952 |