Prognostic value of a 25-gene assay in patients with gastric cancer after curative resection

Abstract This study aimed to develop and validate a practical, reliable assay for prognosis and chemotherapy benefit prediction compared with conventional staging in Gastric cancer (GC). Twenty-three candidate genes with significant correlation between quantitative hybridization and microarray resul...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiaohong Wang, Yiqiang Liu, Zhaojian Niu, Runjia Fu, Yongning Jia, Li Zhang, Duanfang Shao, Hong Du, Ying Hu, Xiaofang Xing, Xiaojing Cheng, Lin Li, Ting Guo, Ziyu Li, Qunsheng Ji, Lianhai Zhang, Jiafu Ji
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2017
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/fdaa7185fdb94e75a7e452352bb98925
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:fdaa7185fdb94e75a7e452352bb98925
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:fdaa7185fdb94e75a7e452352bb989252021-12-02T12:30:26ZPrognostic value of a 25-gene assay in patients with gastric cancer after curative resection10.1038/s41598-017-07604-y2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/fdaa7185fdb94e75a7e452352bb989252017-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07604-yhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract This study aimed to develop and validate a practical, reliable assay for prognosis and chemotherapy benefit prediction compared with conventional staging in Gastric cancer (GC). Twenty-three candidate genes with significant correlation between quantitative hybridization and microarray results plus 2 reference genes were selected to form a 25-gene prognostic classifier, which can classify patients into 3 distinct groups of different risk of mortality obtained by analyzing microarray data from 78 frozen tumor specimens. The 25-gene assay was associated with overall survival in both training (P = 0.017) and testing cohort (P = 0.005) (462 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples). The risk prediction in stages I + II is significantly better than that in stages III. Analysis demonstrated that this 25-gene signature is an independent prognostic predictor and show higher prognostic accuracy than conventional TNM staging in early stage patients. Moreover, only high-risk patients in stage I + II were found benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.043), while low-risk patients in stage III were not found benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. In conclusion, our results suggest that this 25-gene assay can reliably identify patients with different risk for mortality after surgery, especially for stage I + II patients, and might be able to predict patients who benefit from chemotherapy.Xiaohong WangYiqiang LiuZhaojian NiuRunjia FuYongning JiaLi ZhangDuanfang ShaoHong DuYing HuXiaofang XingXiaojing ChengLin LiTing GuoZiyu LiQunsheng JiLianhai ZhangJiafu JiNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Xiaohong Wang
Yiqiang Liu
Zhaojian Niu
Runjia Fu
Yongning Jia
Li Zhang
Duanfang Shao
Hong Du
Ying Hu
Xiaofang Xing
Xiaojing Cheng
Lin Li
Ting Guo
Ziyu Li
Qunsheng Ji
Lianhai Zhang
Jiafu Ji
Prognostic value of a 25-gene assay in patients with gastric cancer after curative resection
description Abstract This study aimed to develop and validate a practical, reliable assay for prognosis and chemotherapy benefit prediction compared with conventional staging in Gastric cancer (GC). Twenty-three candidate genes with significant correlation between quantitative hybridization and microarray results plus 2 reference genes were selected to form a 25-gene prognostic classifier, which can classify patients into 3 distinct groups of different risk of mortality obtained by analyzing microarray data from 78 frozen tumor specimens. The 25-gene assay was associated with overall survival in both training (P = 0.017) and testing cohort (P = 0.005) (462 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples). The risk prediction in stages I + II is significantly better than that in stages III. Analysis demonstrated that this 25-gene signature is an independent prognostic predictor and show higher prognostic accuracy than conventional TNM staging in early stage patients. Moreover, only high-risk patients in stage I + II were found benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.043), while low-risk patients in stage III were not found benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. In conclusion, our results suggest that this 25-gene assay can reliably identify patients with different risk for mortality after surgery, especially for stage I + II patients, and might be able to predict patients who benefit from chemotherapy.
format article
author Xiaohong Wang
Yiqiang Liu
Zhaojian Niu
Runjia Fu
Yongning Jia
Li Zhang
Duanfang Shao
Hong Du
Ying Hu
Xiaofang Xing
Xiaojing Cheng
Lin Li
Ting Guo
Ziyu Li
Qunsheng Ji
Lianhai Zhang
Jiafu Ji
author_facet Xiaohong Wang
Yiqiang Liu
Zhaojian Niu
Runjia Fu
Yongning Jia
Li Zhang
Duanfang Shao
Hong Du
Ying Hu
Xiaofang Xing
Xiaojing Cheng
Lin Li
Ting Guo
Ziyu Li
Qunsheng Ji
Lianhai Zhang
Jiafu Ji
author_sort Xiaohong Wang
title Prognostic value of a 25-gene assay in patients with gastric cancer after curative resection
title_short Prognostic value of a 25-gene assay in patients with gastric cancer after curative resection
title_full Prognostic value of a 25-gene assay in patients with gastric cancer after curative resection
title_fullStr Prognostic value of a 25-gene assay in patients with gastric cancer after curative resection
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic value of a 25-gene assay in patients with gastric cancer after curative resection
title_sort prognostic value of a 25-gene assay in patients with gastric cancer after curative resection
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/fdaa7185fdb94e75a7e452352bb98925
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaohongwang prognosticvalueofa25geneassayinpatientswithgastriccanceraftercurativeresection
AT yiqiangliu prognosticvalueofa25geneassayinpatientswithgastriccanceraftercurativeresection
AT zhaojianniu prognosticvalueofa25geneassayinpatientswithgastriccanceraftercurativeresection
AT runjiafu prognosticvalueofa25geneassayinpatientswithgastriccanceraftercurativeresection
AT yongningjia prognosticvalueofa25geneassayinpatientswithgastriccanceraftercurativeresection
AT lizhang prognosticvalueofa25geneassayinpatientswithgastriccanceraftercurativeresection
AT duanfangshao prognosticvalueofa25geneassayinpatientswithgastriccanceraftercurativeresection
AT hongdu prognosticvalueofa25geneassayinpatientswithgastriccanceraftercurativeresection
AT yinghu prognosticvalueofa25geneassayinpatientswithgastriccanceraftercurativeresection
AT xiaofangxing prognosticvalueofa25geneassayinpatientswithgastriccanceraftercurativeresection
AT xiaojingcheng prognosticvalueofa25geneassayinpatientswithgastriccanceraftercurativeresection
AT linli prognosticvalueofa25geneassayinpatientswithgastriccanceraftercurativeresection
AT tingguo prognosticvalueofa25geneassayinpatientswithgastriccanceraftercurativeresection
AT ziyuli prognosticvalueofa25geneassayinpatientswithgastriccanceraftercurativeresection
AT qunshengji prognosticvalueofa25geneassayinpatientswithgastriccanceraftercurativeresection
AT lianhaizhang prognosticvalueofa25geneassayinpatientswithgastriccanceraftercurativeresection
AT jiafuji prognosticvalueofa25geneassayinpatientswithgastriccanceraftercurativeresection
_version_ 1718394374991118336