Is Instrumental Compression Equally Effective and Comfortable for Physiotherapists and Physiotherapy Students than Manual Compression? A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study

The objective of this work is to compare the homogeneity of instrumental and manual compression during the simulation of a pressure release technique, measured with a dynamometer, as well as to evaluate the comparative degree of comfort by physiotherapists and physiotherapy students when performing...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sara Pérez-Palomares, Carolina Jiménez-Sánchez, Ignacio Serrano-Herrero, Pablo Herrero, Sandra Calvo
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/fdd610ec1676418ca77289e92fd6fd11
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:fdd610ec1676418ca77289e92fd6fd11
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:fdd610ec1676418ca77289e92fd6fd112021-11-25T17:51:18ZIs Instrumental Compression Equally Effective and Comfortable for Physiotherapists and Physiotherapy Students than Manual Compression? A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study10.3390/ijerph1822121211660-46011661-7827https://doaj.org/article/fdd610ec1676418ca77289e92fd6fd112021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/22/12121https://doaj.org/toc/1661-7827https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601The objective of this work is to compare the homogeneity of instrumental and manual compression during the simulation of a pressure release technique, measured with a dynamometer, as well as to evaluate the comparative degree of comfort by physiotherapists and physiotherapy students when performing this technique. Methods: A comparative cross-sectional study was carried out with physiotherapists (lecturers with clinical experience) and 4th year students of the Physiotherapy Degree at Universidad San Jorge. The amount of pressure performed and how it was maintained during 80 s with both techniques was analysed using a digital dynamometer. The degree of comfort was evaluated using a modified numeric rating scale, with higher values representing a higher degree of discomfort. Results: A total of 30 subjects participated. Significant differences were found between the techniques in terms of maintaining a constant pressure level for 80 s (<i>p</i> = 0.043). A statistically significant difference was found between both techniques in the period from 45 to 80 s. Regarding the degree of discomfort, the value obtained from the students’ responses was 4.67 (1.35) for the manual technique and 1.93 (0.88) for the instrumental technique. In the case of physiotherapists, the comfort was 4.87 (2.13) for the manual technique and 3.33 (1.54) for the instrumental technique. Conclusion: The sustained manual compression necessary in manual pressure release techniques in the treatment of myofascial trigger points can be performed with assistive tools that guarantee a uniform compression maintained throughout the development of the technique and are more comfortable for physiotherapists.Sara Pérez-PalomaresCarolina Jiménez-SánchezIgnacio Serrano-HerreroPablo HerreroSandra CalvoMDPI AGarticlepressure releasepressure pain thresholdmyofascial trigger pointsmusculoskeletal painmyofascial painMedicineRENInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol 18, Iss 12121, p 12121 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic pressure release
pressure pain threshold
myofascial trigger points
musculoskeletal pain
myofascial pain
Medicine
R
spellingShingle pressure release
pressure pain threshold
myofascial trigger points
musculoskeletal pain
myofascial pain
Medicine
R
Sara Pérez-Palomares
Carolina Jiménez-Sánchez
Ignacio Serrano-Herrero
Pablo Herrero
Sandra Calvo
Is Instrumental Compression Equally Effective and Comfortable for Physiotherapists and Physiotherapy Students than Manual Compression? A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study
description The objective of this work is to compare the homogeneity of instrumental and manual compression during the simulation of a pressure release technique, measured with a dynamometer, as well as to evaluate the comparative degree of comfort by physiotherapists and physiotherapy students when performing this technique. Methods: A comparative cross-sectional study was carried out with physiotherapists (lecturers with clinical experience) and 4th year students of the Physiotherapy Degree at Universidad San Jorge. The amount of pressure performed and how it was maintained during 80 s with both techniques was analysed using a digital dynamometer. The degree of comfort was evaluated using a modified numeric rating scale, with higher values representing a higher degree of discomfort. Results: A total of 30 subjects participated. Significant differences were found between the techniques in terms of maintaining a constant pressure level for 80 s (<i>p</i> = 0.043). A statistically significant difference was found between both techniques in the period from 45 to 80 s. Regarding the degree of discomfort, the value obtained from the students’ responses was 4.67 (1.35) for the manual technique and 1.93 (0.88) for the instrumental technique. In the case of physiotherapists, the comfort was 4.87 (2.13) for the manual technique and 3.33 (1.54) for the instrumental technique. Conclusion: The sustained manual compression necessary in manual pressure release techniques in the treatment of myofascial trigger points can be performed with assistive tools that guarantee a uniform compression maintained throughout the development of the technique and are more comfortable for physiotherapists.
format article
author Sara Pérez-Palomares
Carolina Jiménez-Sánchez
Ignacio Serrano-Herrero
Pablo Herrero
Sandra Calvo
author_facet Sara Pérez-Palomares
Carolina Jiménez-Sánchez
Ignacio Serrano-Herrero
Pablo Herrero
Sandra Calvo
author_sort Sara Pérez-Palomares
title Is Instrumental Compression Equally Effective and Comfortable for Physiotherapists and Physiotherapy Students than Manual Compression? A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study
title_short Is Instrumental Compression Equally Effective and Comfortable for Physiotherapists and Physiotherapy Students than Manual Compression? A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Is Instrumental Compression Equally Effective and Comfortable for Physiotherapists and Physiotherapy Students than Manual Compression? A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Is Instrumental Compression Equally Effective and Comfortable for Physiotherapists and Physiotherapy Students than Manual Compression? A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Is Instrumental Compression Equally Effective and Comfortable for Physiotherapists and Physiotherapy Students than Manual Compression? A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort is instrumental compression equally effective and comfortable for physiotherapists and physiotherapy students than manual compression? a comparative cross-sectional study
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/fdd610ec1676418ca77289e92fd6fd11
work_keys_str_mv AT saraperezpalomares isinstrumentalcompressionequallyeffectiveandcomfortableforphysiotherapistsandphysiotherapystudentsthanmanualcompressionacomparativecrosssectionalstudy
AT carolinajimenezsanchez isinstrumentalcompressionequallyeffectiveandcomfortableforphysiotherapistsandphysiotherapystudentsthanmanualcompressionacomparativecrosssectionalstudy
AT ignacioserranoherrero isinstrumentalcompressionequallyeffectiveandcomfortableforphysiotherapistsandphysiotherapystudentsthanmanualcompressionacomparativecrosssectionalstudy
AT pabloherrero isinstrumentalcompressionequallyeffectiveandcomfortableforphysiotherapistsandphysiotherapystudentsthanmanualcompressionacomparativecrosssectionalstudy
AT sandracalvo isinstrumentalcompressionequallyeffectiveandcomfortableforphysiotherapistsandphysiotherapystudentsthanmanualcompressionacomparativecrosssectionalstudy
_version_ 1718411962212155392