Maraviroc as intensification strategy in HIV-1 positive patients with deficient immunological response: an Italian randomized clinical trial.
<h4>Background</h4>Immunological non-responders (INRs) lacked CD4 increase despite HIV-viremia suppression on HAART and had an increased risk of disease progression. We assessed immune reconstitution profile upon intensification with maraviroc in INRs.<h4>Methods</h4>We desig...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/fde61c47e2224ac98aa3fcc74da66426 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:fde61c47e2224ac98aa3fcc74da66426 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:fde61c47e2224ac98aa3fcc74da664262021-11-18T08:46:26ZMaraviroc as intensification strategy in HIV-1 positive patients with deficient immunological response: an Italian randomized clinical trial.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0080157https://doaj.org/article/fde61c47e2224ac98aa3fcc74da664262013-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24244635/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4>Immunological non-responders (INRs) lacked CD4 increase despite HIV-viremia suppression on HAART and had an increased risk of disease progression. We assessed immune reconstitution profile upon intensification with maraviroc in INRs.<h4>Methods</h4>We designed a multi-centric, randomized, parallel, open label, phase 4 superiority trial. We enrolled 97 patients on HAART with CD4+<200/µL and/or CD4+ recovery ≤ 25% and HIV-RNA<50 cp/mL. Patients were randomized 1:1 to HAART+maraviroc or continued HAART. CD4+ and CD8+ CD45+RA/RO, Ki67 expression and plasma IL-7 were quantified at W0, W12 and W48.<h4>Results</h4>By W48 both groups displayed a CD4 increase without a significant inter-group difference. A statistically significant change in CD8 favored patients in arm HAART+maraviroc versus HAART at W12 (p=.009) and W48 (p=.025). The CD4>200/µL and CD4>200/µL + CD4 gain ≥ 25% end-points were not satisfied at W12 (p=.24 and p=.619) nor at W48 (p=.076 and p=.236). Patients continuing HAART displayed no major changes in parameters of T-cell homeostasis and activation. Maraviroc-receiving patients experienced a significant rise in circulating IL-7 by W48 (p=.01), and a trend in temporary reduction in activated HLA-DR+CD38+CD4+ by W12 (p=.06) that was not maintained at W48.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Maraviroc intensification in INRs did not have a significant advantage in reconstituting CD4 T-cell pool, but did substantially expand CD8. It resulted in a low rate of treatment discontinuations.<h4>Trial registration</h4>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00884858 http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00884858.Stefano RusconiPaola VitielloFulvio AdorniElisa ColellaEmanuele FocàAmedeo CapettiPaola MeravigliaClara AbeliStefano BonoraMarco D'AnnunzioAntonio Di BiagioMassimo Di PietroLuca ButiniGiancarlo OrofinoManuela ColafigliGabriella d'EttorreDaniela FrancisciGiustino ParrutiAlessandro SoriaAnna Rita BuonominiChiara TommasiSilvia MostiFrancesca BaiSilvia Di Nardo StuppinoManuela MorosiMarco MontanoPamela TauEsther MerliniGiulia MarchettiPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 8, Iss 11, p e80157 (2013) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Stefano Rusconi Paola Vitiello Fulvio Adorni Elisa Colella Emanuele Focà Amedeo Capetti Paola Meraviglia Clara Abeli Stefano Bonora Marco D'Annunzio Antonio Di Biagio Massimo Di Pietro Luca Butini Giancarlo Orofino Manuela Colafigli Gabriella d'Ettorre Daniela Francisci Giustino Parruti Alessandro Soria Anna Rita Buonomini Chiara Tommasi Silvia Mosti Francesca Bai Silvia Di Nardo Stuppino Manuela Morosi Marco Montano Pamela Tau Esther Merlini Giulia Marchetti Maraviroc as intensification strategy in HIV-1 positive patients with deficient immunological response: an Italian randomized clinical trial. |
description |
<h4>Background</h4>Immunological non-responders (INRs) lacked CD4 increase despite HIV-viremia suppression on HAART and had an increased risk of disease progression. We assessed immune reconstitution profile upon intensification with maraviroc in INRs.<h4>Methods</h4>We designed a multi-centric, randomized, parallel, open label, phase 4 superiority trial. We enrolled 97 patients on HAART with CD4+<200/µL and/or CD4+ recovery ≤ 25% and HIV-RNA<50 cp/mL. Patients were randomized 1:1 to HAART+maraviroc or continued HAART. CD4+ and CD8+ CD45+RA/RO, Ki67 expression and plasma IL-7 were quantified at W0, W12 and W48.<h4>Results</h4>By W48 both groups displayed a CD4 increase without a significant inter-group difference. A statistically significant change in CD8 favored patients in arm HAART+maraviroc versus HAART at W12 (p=.009) and W48 (p=.025). The CD4>200/µL and CD4>200/µL + CD4 gain ≥ 25% end-points were not satisfied at W12 (p=.24 and p=.619) nor at W48 (p=.076 and p=.236). Patients continuing HAART displayed no major changes in parameters of T-cell homeostasis and activation. Maraviroc-receiving patients experienced a significant rise in circulating IL-7 by W48 (p=.01), and a trend in temporary reduction in activated HLA-DR+CD38+CD4+ by W12 (p=.06) that was not maintained at W48.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Maraviroc intensification in INRs did not have a significant advantage in reconstituting CD4 T-cell pool, but did substantially expand CD8. It resulted in a low rate of treatment discontinuations.<h4>Trial registration</h4>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00884858 http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00884858. |
format |
article |
author |
Stefano Rusconi Paola Vitiello Fulvio Adorni Elisa Colella Emanuele Focà Amedeo Capetti Paola Meraviglia Clara Abeli Stefano Bonora Marco D'Annunzio Antonio Di Biagio Massimo Di Pietro Luca Butini Giancarlo Orofino Manuela Colafigli Gabriella d'Ettorre Daniela Francisci Giustino Parruti Alessandro Soria Anna Rita Buonomini Chiara Tommasi Silvia Mosti Francesca Bai Silvia Di Nardo Stuppino Manuela Morosi Marco Montano Pamela Tau Esther Merlini Giulia Marchetti |
author_facet |
Stefano Rusconi Paola Vitiello Fulvio Adorni Elisa Colella Emanuele Focà Amedeo Capetti Paola Meraviglia Clara Abeli Stefano Bonora Marco D'Annunzio Antonio Di Biagio Massimo Di Pietro Luca Butini Giancarlo Orofino Manuela Colafigli Gabriella d'Ettorre Daniela Francisci Giustino Parruti Alessandro Soria Anna Rita Buonomini Chiara Tommasi Silvia Mosti Francesca Bai Silvia Di Nardo Stuppino Manuela Morosi Marco Montano Pamela Tau Esther Merlini Giulia Marchetti |
author_sort |
Stefano Rusconi |
title |
Maraviroc as intensification strategy in HIV-1 positive patients with deficient immunological response: an Italian randomized clinical trial. |
title_short |
Maraviroc as intensification strategy in HIV-1 positive patients with deficient immunological response: an Italian randomized clinical trial. |
title_full |
Maraviroc as intensification strategy in HIV-1 positive patients with deficient immunological response: an Italian randomized clinical trial. |
title_fullStr |
Maraviroc as intensification strategy in HIV-1 positive patients with deficient immunological response: an Italian randomized clinical trial. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Maraviroc as intensification strategy in HIV-1 positive patients with deficient immunological response: an Italian randomized clinical trial. |
title_sort |
maraviroc as intensification strategy in hiv-1 positive patients with deficient immunological response: an italian randomized clinical trial. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
publishDate |
2013 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/fde61c47e2224ac98aa3fcc74da66426 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT stefanorusconi maravirocasintensificationstrategyinhiv1positivepatientswithdeficientimmunologicalresponseanitalianrandomizedclinicaltrial AT paolavitiello maravirocasintensificationstrategyinhiv1positivepatientswithdeficientimmunologicalresponseanitalianrandomizedclinicaltrial AT fulvioadorni maravirocasintensificationstrategyinhiv1positivepatientswithdeficientimmunologicalresponseanitalianrandomizedclinicaltrial AT elisacolella maravirocasintensificationstrategyinhiv1positivepatientswithdeficientimmunologicalresponseanitalianrandomizedclinicaltrial AT emanuelefoca maravirocasintensificationstrategyinhiv1positivepatientswithdeficientimmunologicalresponseanitalianrandomizedclinicaltrial AT amedeocapetti maravirocasintensificationstrategyinhiv1positivepatientswithdeficientimmunologicalresponseanitalianrandomizedclinicaltrial AT paolameraviglia maravirocasintensificationstrategyinhiv1positivepatientswithdeficientimmunologicalresponseanitalianrandomizedclinicaltrial AT claraabeli maravirocasintensificationstrategyinhiv1positivepatientswithdeficientimmunologicalresponseanitalianrandomizedclinicaltrial AT stefanobonora maravirocasintensificationstrategyinhiv1positivepatientswithdeficientimmunologicalresponseanitalianrandomizedclinicaltrial AT marcodannunzio maravirocasintensificationstrategyinhiv1positivepatientswithdeficientimmunologicalresponseanitalianrandomizedclinicaltrial AT antoniodibiagio maravirocasintensificationstrategyinhiv1positivepatientswithdeficientimmunologicalresponseanitalianrandomizedclinicaltrial AT massimodipietro maravirocasintensificationstrategyinhiv1positivepatientswithdeficientimmunologicalresponseanitalianrandomizedclinicaltrial AT lucabutini maravirocasintensificationstrategyinhiv1positivepatientswithdeficientimmunologicalresponseanitalianrandomizedclinicaltrial AT giancarloorofino maravirocasintensificationstrategyinhiv1positivepatientswithdeficientimmunologicalresponseanitalianrandomizedclinicaltrial AT manuelacolafigli maravirocasintensificationstrategyinhiv1positivepatientswithdeficientimmunologicalresponseanitalianrandomizedclinicaltrial AT gabrielladettorre maravirocasintensificationstrategyinhiv1positivepatientswithdeficientimmunologicalresponseanitalianrandomizedclinicaltrial AT danielafrancisci maravirocasintensificationstrategyinhiv1positivepatientswithdeficientimmunologicalresponseanitalianrandomizedclinicaltrial AT giustinoparruti maravirocasintensificationstrategyinhiv1positivepatientswithdeficientimmunologicalresponseanitalianrandomizedclinicaltrial AT alessandrosoria maravirocasintensificationstrategyinhiv1positivepatientswithdeficientimmunologicalresponseanitalianrandomizedclinicaltrial AT annaritabuonomini maravirocasintensificationstrategyinhiv1positivepatientswithdeficientimmunologicalresponseanitalianrandomizedclinicaltrial AT chiaratommasi maravirocasintensificationstrategyinhiv1positivepatientswithdeficientimmunologicalresponseanitalianrandomizedclinicaltrial AT silviamosti maravirocasintensificationstrategyinhiv1positivepatientswithdeficientimmunologicalresponseanitalianrandomizedclinicaltrial AT francescabai maravirocasintensificationstrategyinhiv1positivepatientswithdeficientimmunologicalresponseanitalianrandomizedclinicaltrial AT silviadinardostuppino maravirocasintensificationstrategyinhiv1positivepatientswithdeficientimmunologicalresponseanitalianrandomizedclinicaltrial AT manuelamorosi maravirocasintensificationstrategyinhiv1positivepatientswithdeficientimmunologicalresponseanitalianrandomizedclinicaltrial AT marcomontano maravirocasintensificationstrategyinhiv1positivepatientswithdeficientimmunologicalresponseanitalianrandomizedclinicaltrial AT pamelatau maravirocasintensificationstrategyinhiv1positivepatientswithdeficientimmunologicalresponseanitalianrandomizedclinicaltrial AT esthermerlini maravirocasintensificationstrategyinhiv1positivepatientswithdeficientimmunologicalresponseanitalianrandomizedclinicaltrial AT giuliamarchetti maravirocasintensificationstrategyinhiv1positivepatientswithdeficientimmunologicalresponseanitalianrandomizedclinicaltrial |
_version_ |
1718421361829871616 |