Tradeoffs in demographic mechanisms underlie differences in species abundance and stability

Protection of rare species requires advanced understanding of the reasons for their rarity. Here, Hallett et al. show that potential growth rate and density dependence together predict rarity vs. abundance, and that the stability of species of similar sizes depends on the relative strength of these...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lauren M. Hallett, Emily C. Farrer, Katharine N. Suding, Harold A. Mooney, Richard J. Hobbs
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2018
Materias:
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/fde6abc7d65c417cbd1a5e005a651718
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:fde6abc7d65c417cbd1a5e005a651718
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:fde6abc7d65c417cbd1a5e005a6517182021-12-02T16:50:06ZTradeoffs in demographic mechanisms underlie differences in species abundance and stability10.1038/s41467-018-07535-w2041-1723https://doaj.org/article/fde6abc7d65c417cbd1a5e005a6517182018-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07535-whttps://doaj.org/toc/2041-1723Protection of rare species requires advanced understanding of the reasons for their rarity. Here, Hallett et al. show that potential growth rate and density dependence together predict rarity vs. abundance, and that the stability of species of similar sizes depends on the relative strength of these two mechanisms.Lauren M. HallettEmily C. FarrerKatharine N. SudingHarold A. MooneyRichard J. HobbsNature PortfolioarticleScienceQENNature Communications, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 1-6 (2018)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Science
Q
spellingShingle Science
Q
Lauren M. Hallett
Emily C. Farrer
Katharine N. Suding
Harold A. Mooney
Richard J. Hobbs
Tradeoffs in demographic mechanisms underlie differences in species abundance and stability
description Protection of rare species requires advanced understanding of the reasons for their rarity. Here, Hallett et al. show that potential growth rate and density dependence together predict rarity vs. abundance, and that the stability of species of similar sizes depends on the relative strength of these two mechanisms.
format article
author Lauren M. Hallett
Emily C. Farrer
Katharine N. Suding
Harold A. Mooney
Richard J. Hobbs
author_facet Lauren M. Hallett
Emily C. Farrer
Katharine N. Suding
Harold A. Mooney
Richard J. Hobbs
author_sort Lauren M. Hallett
title Tradeoffs in demographic mechanisms underlie differences in species abundance and stability
title_short Tradeoffs in demographic mechanisms underlie differences in species abundance and stability
title_full Tradeoffs in demographic mechanisms underlie differences in species abundance and stability
title_fullStr Tradeoffs in demographic mechanisms underlie differences in species abundance and stability
title_full_unstemmed Tradeoffs in demographic mechanisms underlie differences in species abundance and stability
title_sort tradeoffs in demographic mechanisms underlie differences in species abundance and stability
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2018
url https://doaj.org/article/fde6abc7d65c417cbd1a5e005a651718
work_keys_str_mv AT laurenmhallett tradeoffsindemographicmechanismsunderliedifferencesinspeciesabundanceandstability
AT emilycfarrer tradeoffsindemographicmechanismsunderliedifferencesinspeciesabundanceandstability
AT katharinensuding tradeoffsindemographicmechanismsunderliedifferencesinspeciesabundanceandstability
AT haroldamooney tradeoffsindemographicmechanismsunderliedifferencesinspeciesabundanceandstability
AT richardjhobbs tradeoffsindemographicmechanismsunderliedifferencesinspeciesabundanceandstability
_version_ 1718383135846039552