The Old and the New: Can Physics-Informed Deep-Learning Replace Traditional Linear Solvers?

Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINN) are neural networks encoding the problem governing equations, such as Partial Differential Equations (PDE), as a part of the neural network. PINNs have emerged as a new essential tool to solve various challenging problems, including computing linear systems ar...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Stefano Markidis 
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/fe27750990e74469aaee567ae2e486e3
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:fe27750990e74469aaee567ae2e486e3
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:fe27750990e74469aaee567ae2e486e32021-11-19T06:04:34ZThe Old and the New: Can Physics-Informed Deep-Learning Replace Traditional Linear Solvers?2624-909X10.3389/fdata.2021.669097https://doaj.org/article/fe27750990e74469aaee567ae2e486e32021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fdata.2021.669097/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/2624-909XPhysics-Informed Neural Networks (PINN) are neural networks encoding the problem governing equations, such as Partial Differential Equations (PDE), as a part of the neural network. PINNs have emerged as a new essential tool to solve various challenging problems, including computing linear systems arising from PDEs, a task for which several traditional methods exist. In this work, we focus first on evaluating the potential of PINNs as linear solvers in the case of the Poisson equation, an omnipresent equation in scientific computing. We characterize PINN linear solvers in terms of accuracy and performance under different network configurations (depth, activation functions, input data set distribution). We highlight the critical role of transfer learning. Our results show that low-frequency components of the solution converge quickly as an effect of the F-principle. In contrast, an accurate solution of the high frequencies requires an exceedingly long time. To address this limitation, we propose integrating PINNs into traditional linear solvers. We show that this integration leads to the development of new solvers whose performance is on par with other high-performance solvers, such as PETSc conjugate gradient linear solvers, in terms of performance and accuracy. Overall, while the accuracy and computational performance are still a limiting factor for the direct use of PINN linear solvers, hybrid strategies combining old traditional linear solver approaches with new emerging deep-learning techniques are among the most promising methods for developing a new class of linear solvers.Stefano Markidis Frontiers Media S.A.articlephysics-informed deep-learningPINNscientific computingPoisson solversdeep-learningInformation technologyT58.5-58.64ENFrontiers in Big Data, Vol 4 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic physics-informed deep-learning
PINN
scientific computing
Poisson solvers
deep-learning
Information technology
T58.5-58.64
spellingShingle physics-informed deep-learning
PINN
scientific computing
Poisson solvers
deep-learning
Information technology
T58.5-58.64
Stefano Markidis 
The Old and the New: Can Physics-Informed Deep-Learning Replace Traditional Linear Solvers?
description Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINN) are neural networks encoding the problem governing equations, such as Partial Differential Equations (PDE), as a part of the neural network. PINNs have emerged as a new essential tool to solve various challenging problems, including computing linear systems arising from PDEs, a task for which several traditional methods exist. In this work, we focus first on evaluating the potential of PINNs as linear solvers in the case of the Poisson equation, an omnipresent equation in scientific computing. We characterize PINN linear solvers in terms of accuracy and performance under different network configurations (depth, activation functions, input data set distribution). We highlight the critical role of transfer learning. Our results show that low-frequency components of the solution converge quickly as an effect of the F-principle. In contrast, an accurate solution of the high frequencies requires an exceedingly long time. To address this limitation, we propose integrating PINNs into traditional linear solvers. We show that this integration leads to the development of new solvers whose performance is on par with other high-performance solvers, such as PETSc conjugate gradient linear solvers, in terms of performance and accuracy. Overall, while the accuracy and computational performance are still a limiting factor for the direct use of PINN linear solvers, hybrid strategies combining old traditional linear solver approaches with new emerging deep-learning techniques are among the most promising methods for developing a new class of linear solvers.
format article
author Stefano Markidis 
author_facet Stefano Markidis 
author_sort Stefano Markidis 
title The Old and the New: Can Physics-Informed Deep-Learning Replace Traditional Linear Solvers?
title_short The Old and the New: Can Physics-Informed Deep-Learning Replace Traditional Linear Solvers?
title_full The Old and the New: Can Physics-Informed Deep-Learning Replace Traditional Linear Solvers?
title_fullStr The Old and the New: Can Physics-Informed Deep-Learning Replace Traditional Linear Solvers?
title_full_unstemmed The Old and the New: Can Physics-Informed Deep-Learning Replace Traditional Linear Solvers?
title_sort old and the new: can physics-informed deep-learning replace traditional linear solvers?
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/fe27750990e74469aaee567ae2e486e3
work_keys_str_mv AT stefanomarkidis theoldandthenewcanphysicsinformeddeeplearningreplacetraditionallinearsolvers
AT stefanomarkidis oldandthenewcanphysicsinformeddeeplearningreplacetraditionallinearsolvers
_version_ 1718420353164771328