Saliva-derived microcosm biofilms grown on different oral surfaces in vitro

Abstract The microbial composition of a specific oral niche could be influenced by initial bacterial adherence, nutrient and physiological property of the local surface. To investigate the influence of nutrient and surface properties on microbial composition, saliva-derived biofilms were grown in ag...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiaolan Li, Lin Shang, Bernd W. Brandt, Mark J. Buijs, Sanne Roffel, Cor van Loveren, Wim Crielaard, Susan Gibbs, Dong Mei Deng
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/fe2857e0011f4bc0a23c327a7387c9bb
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:fe2857e0011f4bc0a23c327a7387c9bb
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:fe2857e0011f4bc0a23c327a7387c9bb2021-12-02T17:19:18ZSaliva-derived microcosm biofilms grown on different oral surfaces in vitro10.1038/s41522-021-00246-z2055-5008https://doaj.org/article/fe2857e0011f4bc0a23c327a7387c9bb2021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41522-021-00246-zhttps://doaj.org/toc/2055-5008Abstract The microbial composition of a specific oral niche could be influenced by initial bacterial adherence, nutrient and physiological property of the local surface. To investigate the influence of nutrient and surface properties on microbial composition, saliva-derived biofilms were grown in agar on three substrata: Reconstructed Human Gingiva (RHG), a hydroxyapatite (HAP) surface, and a titanium (TI) surface. Agar was mixed with either Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) or Thompson (TP) medium. After 1, 3, or 5 days, biofilm viability (by colony forming units) and microbiome profiles (by 16 S rDNA amplicon sequencing) were determined. On RHG, biofilm viability and composition were similar between BHI and TP. However, on the abiotic substrata, biofilm properties greatly depended on the type of medium and substratum. In BHI, the viability of HAP-biofilm first decreased and then increased, whereas that of TI-biofilm decreased in time until a 6-log reduction. In TP, either no or a 2-log reduction in viability was observed for HAP- or TI-biofilms respectively. Furthermore, different bacterial genera (or higher level) were differentially abundant in the biofilms on 3 substrata: Haemophilus and Porphyromonas for RHG; Bacilli for HAP and Prevotella for TI. In conclusion, RHG, the biotic substratum, is able to support a highly viable and diverse microbiome. In contrast, the viability and diversity of the biofilms on the abiotic substrata were influenced by the substrata type, pH of the environment and the richness of the growth media. These results suggest that the host (oral mucosa) plays a vital role in the oral ecology.Xiaolan LiLin ShangBernd W. BrandtMark J. BuijsSanne RoffelCor van LoverenWim CrielaardSusan GibbsDong Mei DengNature PortfolioarticleMicrobial ecologyQR100-130ENnpj Biofilms and Microbiomes, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Microbial ecology
QR100-130
spellingShingle Microbial ecology
QR100-130
Xiaolan Li
Lin Shang
Bernd W. Brandt
Mark J. Buijs
Sanne Roffel
Cor van Loveren
Wim Crielaard
Susan Gibbs
Dong Mei Deng
Saliva-derived microcosm biofilms grown on different oral surfaces in vitro
description Abstract The microbial composition of a specific oral niche could be influenced by initial bacterial adherence, nutrient and physiological property of the local surface. To investigate the influence of nutrient and surface properties on microbial composition, saliva-derived biofilms were grown in agar on three substrata: Reconstructed Human Gingiva (RHG), a hydroxyapatite (HAP) surface, and a titanium (TI) surface. Agar was mixed with either Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) or Thompson (TP) medium. After 1, 3, or 5 days, biofilm viability (by colony forming units) and microbiome profiles (by 16 S rDNA amplicon sequencing) were determined. On RHG, biofilm viability and composition were similar between BHI and TP. However, on the abiotic substrata, biofilm properties greatly depended on the type of medium and substratum. In BHI, the viability of HAP-biofilm first decreased and then increased, whereas that of TI-biofilm decreased in time until a 6-log reduction. In TP, either no or a 2-log reduction in viability was observed for HAP- or TI-biofilms respectively. Furthermore, different bacterial genera (or higher level) were differentially abundant in the biofilms on 3 substrata: Haemophilus and Porphyromonas for RHG; Bacilli for HAP and Prevotella for TI. In conclusion, RHG, the biotic substratum, is able to support a highly viable and diverse microbiome. In contrast, the viability and diversity of the biofilms on the abiotic substrata were influenced by the substrata type, pH of the environment and the richness of the growth media. These results suggest that the host (oral mucosa) plays a vital role in the oral ecology.
format article
author Xiaolan Li
Lin Shang
Bernd W. Brandt
Mark J. Buijs
Sanne Roffel
Cor van Loveren
Wim Crielaard
Susan Gibbs
Dong Mei Deng
author_facet Xiaolan Li
Lin Shang
Bernd W. Brandt
Mark J. Buijs
Sanne Roffel
Cor van Loveren
Wim Crielaard
Susan Gibbs
Dong Mei Deng
author_sort Xiaolan Li
title Saliva-derived microcosm biofilms grown on different oral surfaces in vitro
title_short Saliva-derived microcosm biofilms grown on different oral surfaces in vitro
title_full Saliva-derived microcosm biofilms grown on different oral surfaces in vitro
title_fullStr Saliva-derived microcosm biofilms grown on different oral surfaces in vitro
title_full_unstemmed Saliva-derived microcosm biofilms grown on different oral surfaces in vitro
title_sort saliva-derived microcosm biofilms grown on different oral surfaces in vitro
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/fe2857e0011f4bc0a23c327a7387c9bb
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaolanli salivaderivedmicrocosmbiofilmsgrownondifferentoralsurfacesinvitro
AT linshang salivaderivedmicrocosmbiofilmsgrownondifferentoralsurfacesinvitro
AT berndwbrandt salivaderivedmicrocosmbiofilmsgrownondifferentoralsurfacesinvitro
AT markjbuijs salivaderivedmicrocosmbiofilmsgrownondifferentoralsurfacesinvitro
AT sanneroffel salivaderivedmicrocosmbiofilmsgrownondifferentoralsurfacesinvitro
AT corvanloveren salivaderivedmicrocosmbiofilmsgrownondifferentoralsurfacesinvitro
AT wimcrielaard salivaderivedmicrocosmbiofilmsgrownondifferentoralsurfacesinvitro
AT susangibbs salivaderivedmicrocosmbiofilmsgrownondifferentoralsurfacesinvitro
AT dongmeideng salivaderivedmicrocosmbiofilmsgrownondifferentoralsurfacesinvitro
_version_ 1718381062700138496