Saliva-derived microcosm biofilms grown on different oral surfaces in vitro
Abstract The microbial composition of a specific oral niche could be influenced by initial bacterial adherence, nutrient and physiological property of the local surface. To investigate the influence of nutrient and surface properties on microbial composition, saliva-derived biofilms were grown in ag...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/fe2857e0011f4bc0a23c327a7387c9bb |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:fe2857e0011f4bc0a23c327a7387c9bb |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:fe2857e0011f4bc0a23c327a7387c9bb2021-12-02T17:19:18ZSaliva-derived microcosm biofilms grown on different oral surfaces in vitro10.1038/s41522-021-00246-z2055-5008https://doaj.org/article/fe2857e0011f4bc0a23c327a7387c9bb2021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41522-021-00246-zhttps://doaj.org/toc/2055-5008Abstract The microbial composition of a specific oral niche could be influenced by initial bacterial adherence, nutrient and physiological property of the local surface. To investigate the influence of nutrient and surface properties on microbial composition, saliva-derived biofilms were grown in agar on three substrata: Reconstructed Human Gingiva (RHG), a hydroxyapatite (HAP) surface, and a titanium (TI) surface. Agar was mixed with either Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) or Thompson (TP) medium. After 1, 3, or 5 days, biofilm viability (by colony forming units) and microbiome profiles (by 16 S rDNA amplicon sequencing) were determined. On RHG, biofilm viability and composition were similar between BHI and TP. However, on the abiotic substrata, biofilm properties greatly depended on the type of medium and substratum. In BHI, the viability of HAP-biofilm first decreased and then increased, whereas that of TI-biofilm decreased in time until a 6-log reduction. In TP, either no or a 2-log reduction in viability was observed for HAP- or TI-biofilms respectively. Furthermore, different bacterial genera (or higher level) were differentially abundant in the biofilms on 3 substrata: Haemophilus and Porphyromonas for RHG; Bacilli for HAP and Prevotella for TI. In conclusion, RHG, the biotic substratum, is able to support a highly viable and diverse microbiome. In contrast, the viability and diversity of the biofilms on the abiotic substrata were influenced by the substrata type, pH of the environment and the richness of the growth media. These results suggest that the host (oral mucosa) plays a vital role in the oral ecology.Xiaolan LiLin ShangBernd W. BrandtMark J. BuijsSanne RoffelCor van LoverenWim CrielaardSusan GibbsDong Mei DengNature PortfolioarticleMicrobial ecologyQR100-130ENnpj Biofilms and Microbiomes, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Microbial ecology QR100-130 |
spellingShingle |
Microbial ecology QR100-130 Xiaolan Li Lin Shang Bernd W. Brandt Mark J. Buijs Sanne Roffel Cor van Loveren Wim Crielaard Susan Gibbs Dong Mei Deng Saliva-derived microcosm biofilms grown on different oral surfaces in vitro |
description |
Abstract The microbial composition of a specific oral niche could be influenced by initial bacterial adherence, nutrient and physiological property of the local surface. To investigate the influence of nutrient and surface properties on microbial composition, saliva-derived biofilms were grown in agar on three substrata: Reconstructed Human Gingiva (RHG), a hydroxyapatite (HAP) surface, and a titanium (TI) surface. Agar was mixed with either Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) or Thompson (TP) medium. After 1, 3, or 5 days, biofilm viability (by colony forming units) and microbiome profiles (by 16 S rDNA amplicon sequencing) were determined. On RHG, biofilm viability and composition were similar between BHI and TP. However, on the abiotic substrata, biofilm properties greatly depended on the type of medium and substratum. In BHI, the viability of HAP-biofilm first decreased and then increased, whereas that of TI-biofilm decreased in time until a 6-log reduction. In TP, either no or a 2-log reduction in viability was observed for HAP- or TI-biofilms respectively. Furthermore, different bacterial genera (or higher level) were differentially abundant in the biofilms on 3 substrata: Haemophilus and Porphyromonas for RHG; Bacilli for HAP and Prevotella for TI. In conclusion, RHG, the biotic substratum, is able to support a highly viable and diverse microbiome. In contrast, the viability and diversity of the biofilms on the abiotic substrata were influenced by the substrata type, pH of the environment and the richness of the growth media. These results suggest that the host (oral mucosa) plays a vital role in the oral ecology. |
format |
article |
author |
Xiaolan Li Lin Shang Bernd W. Brandt Mark J. Buijs Sanne Roffel Cor van Loveren Wim Crielaard Susan Gibbs Dong Mei Deng |
author_facet |
Xiaolan Li Lin Shang Bernd W. Brandt Mark J. Buijs Sanne Roffel Cor van Loveren Wim Crielaard Susan Gibbs Dong Mei Deng |
author_sort |
Xiaolan Li |
title |
Saliva-derived microcosm biofilms grown on different oral surfaces in vitro |
title_short |
Saliva-derived microcosm biofilms grown on different oral surfaces in vitro |
title_full |
Saliva-derived microcosm biofilms grown on different oral surfaces in vitro |
title_fullStr |
Saliva-derived microcosm biofilms grown on different oral surfaces in vitro |
title_full_unstemmed |
Saliva-derived microcosm biofilms grown on different oral surfaces in vitro |
title_sort |
saliva-derived microcosm biofilms grown on different oral surfaces in vitro |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/fe2857e0011f4bc0a23c327a7387c9bb |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT xiaolanli salivaderivedmicrocosmbiofilmsgrownondifferentoralsurfacesinvitro AT linshang salivaderivedmicrocosmbiofilmsgrownondifferentoralsurfacesinvitro AT berndwbrandt salivaderivedmicrocosmbiofilmsgrownondifferentoralsurfacesinvitro AT markjbuijs salivaderivedmicrocosmbiofilmsgrownondifferentoralsurfacesinvitro AT sanneroffel salivaderivedmicrocosmbiofilmsgrownondifferentoralsurfacesinvitro AT corvanloveren salivaderivedmicrocosmbiofilmsgrownondifferentoralsurfacesinvitro AT wimcrielaard salivaderivedmicrocosmbiofilmsgrownondifferentoralsurfacesinvitro AT susangibbs salivaderivedmicrocosmbiofilmsgrownondifferentoralsurfacesinvitro AT dongmeideng salivaderivedmicrocosmbiofilmsgrownondifferentoralsurfacesinvitro |
_version_ |
1718381062700138496 |