Viewpoint and practical recommendations from a movement disorder specialist panel on objective measurement in the clinical management of Parkinson’s disease

Abstract Motor aspects of Parkinson’s disease, such as fluctuations and dyskinesia, can be reliably evaluated using a variety of “wearable” technologies, but practical guidance on objective measurement (OM) and the optimum use of these devices is lacking. Therefore, as a first step, a panel of movem...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Per Odin, K. Ray Chaudhuri, Jens Volkmann, Angelo Antonini, Alexander Storch, Espen Dietrichs, Zvezdan Pirtošek, Tove Henriksen, Malcolm Horne, David Devos, Filip Bergquist
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/fe4c4bf3adf04393a2fc47c77e5e9245
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:fe4c4bf3adf04393a2fc47c77e5e9245
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:fe4c4bf3adf04393a2fc47c77e5e92452021-12-02T16:09:02ZViewpoint and practical recommendations from a movement disorder specialist panel on objective measurement in the clinical management of Parkinson’s disease10.1038/s41531-018-0051-72373-8057https://doaj.org/article/fe4c4bf3adf04393a2fc47c77e5e92452018-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-018-0051-7https://doaj.org/toc/2373-8057Abstract Motor aspects of Parkinson’s disease, such as fluctuations and dyskinesia, can be reliably evaluated using a variety of “wearable” technologies, but practical guidance on objective measurement (OM) and the optimum use of these devices is lacking. Therefore, as a first step, a panel of movement disorder specialists met to provide guidance on how OM could be assessed and incorporated into clinical guidelines. A key aspect of the incorporation of OM into the management of Parkinson’s disease (PD) is defining cutoff values that separate “controlled” from “uncontrolled” symptoms that can be modified by therapy and that relate to an outcome that is relevant to the person with PD (such as quality of life). Defining cutoffs by consensus, which can be subsequently tested and refined, is the first step to optimizing OM in the management of PD. OM should be used by all clinicians that treat people with PD but the least experienced may find the most value, but this requires guidance from experts to allow non-experts to apply guidelines. While evidence is gained for devices that produce OM, expert opinion is needed to supplement the evidence base.Per OdinK. Ray ChaudhuriJens VolkmannAngelo AntoniniAlexander StorchEspen DietrichsZvezdan PirtošekTove HenriksenMalcolm HorneDavid DevosFilip BergquistNature PortfolioarticleNeurology. Diseases of the nervous systemRC346-429ENnpj Parkinson's Disease, Vol 4, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2018)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
RC346-429
spellingShingle Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
RC346-429
Per Odin
K. Ray Chaudhuri
Jens Volkmann
Angelo Antonini
Alexander Storch
Espen Dietrichs
Zvezdan Pirtošek
Tove Henriksen
Malcolm Horne
David Devos
Filip Bergquist
Viewpoint and practical recommendations from a movement disorder specialist panel on objective measurement in the clinical management of Parkinson’s disease
description Abstract Motor aspects of Parkinson’s disease, such as fluctuations and dyskinesia, can be reliably evaluated using a variety of “wearable” technologies, but practical guidance on objective measurement (OM) and the optimum use of these devices is lacking. Therefore, as a first step, a panel of movement disorder specialists met to provide guidance on how OM could be assessed and incorporated into clinical guidelines. A key aspect of the incorporation of OM into the management of Parkinson’s disease (PD) is defining cutoff values that separate “controlled” from “uncontrolled” symptoms that can be modified by therapy and that relate to an outcome that is relevant to the person with PD (such as quality of life). Defining cutoffs by consensus, which can be subsequently tested and refined, is the first step to optimizing OM in the management of PD. OM should be used by all clinicians that treat people with PD but the least experienced may find the most value, but this requires guidance from experts to allow non-experts to apply guidelines. While evidence is gained for devices that produce OM, expert opinion is needed to supplement the evidence base.
format article
author Per Odin
K. Ray Chaudhuri
Jens Volkmann
Angelo Antonini
Alexander Storch
Espen Dietrichs
Zvezdan Pirtošek
Tove Henriksen
Malcolm Horne
David Devos
Filip Bergquist
author_facet Per Odin
K. Ray Chaudhuri
Jens Volkmann
Angelo Antonini
Alexander Storch
Espen Dietrichs
Zvezdan Pirtošek
Tove Henriksen
Malcolm Horne
David Devos
Filip Bergquist
author_sort Per Odin
title Viewpoint and practical recommendations from a movement disorder specialist panel on objective measurement in the clinical management of Parkinson’s disease
title_short Viewpoint and practical recommendations from a movement disorder specialist panel on objective measurement in the clinical management of Parkinson’s disease
title_full Viewpoint and practical recommendations from a movement disorder specialist panel on objective measurement in the clinical management of Parkinson’s disease
title_fullStr Viewpoint and practical recommendations from a movement disorder specialist panel on objective measurement in the clinical management of Parkinson’s disease
title_full_unstemmed Viewpoint and practical recommendations from a movement disorder specialist panel on objective measurement in the clinical management of Parkinson’s disease
title_sort viewpoint and practical recommendations from a movement disorder specialist panel on objective measurement in the clinical management of parkinson’s disease
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2018
url https://doaj.org/article/fe4c4bf3adf04393a2fc47c77e5e9245
work_keys_str_mv AT perodin viewpointandpracticalrecommendationsfromamovementdisorderspecialistpanelonobjectivemeasurementintheclinicalmanagementofparkinsonsdisease
AT kraychaudhuri viewpointandpracticalrecommendationsfromamovementdisorderspecialistpanelonobjectivemeasurementintheclinicalmanagementofparkinsonsdisease
AT jensvolkmann viewpointandpracticalrecommendationsfromamovementdisorderspecialistpanelonobjectivemeasurementintheclinicalmanagementofparkinsonsdisease
AT angeloantonini viewpointandpracticalrecommendationsfromamovementdisorderspecialistpanelonobjectivemeasurementintheclinicalmanagementofparkinsonsdisease
AT alexanderstorch viewpointandpracticalrecommendationsfromamovementdisorderspecialistpanelonobjectivemeasurementintheclinicalmanagementofparkinsonsdisease
AT espendietrichs viewpointandpracticalrecommendationsfromamovementdisorderspecialistpanelonobjectivemeasurementintheclinicalmanagementofparkinsonsdisease
AT zvezdanpirtosek viewpointandpracticalrecommendationsfromamovementdisorderspecialistpanelonobjectivemeasurementintheclinicalmanagementofparkinsonsdisease
AT tovehenriksen viewpointandpracticalrecommendationsfromamovementdisorderspecialistpanelonobjectivemeasurementintheclinicalmanagementofparkinsonsdisease
AT malcolmhorne viewpointandpracticalrecommendationsfromamovementdisorderspecialistpanelonobjectivemeasurementintheclinicalmanagementofparkinsonsdisease
AT daviddevos viewpointandpracticalrecommendationsfromamovementdisorderspecialistpanelonobjectivemeasurementintheclinicalmanagementofparkinsonsdisease
AT filipbergquist viewpointandpracticalrecommendationsfromamovementdisorderspecialistpanelonobjectivemeasurementintheclinicalmanagementofparkinsonsdisease
_version_ 1718384509358964736