Image-Guided Navigation in Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery using a Cranial Frame

Background Data: Cervicothoracic, high thoracic, and craniocervical instrumented anterior spinal procedures pose a considerable challenge to the surgeon, mainly because intraoperative imaging by fluoroscopy is inadequate. To a certain extent the surgeon can make use of 3D-fluoroscopy for intraoperat...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmed R Rizk, Andy Ottenbacher
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Egyptian Spine Association 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/fe6e14874918404a8eaeddfbea2ced89
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:fe6e14874918404a8eaeddfbea2ced89
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:fe6e14874918404a8eaeddfbea2ced892021-12-02T09:49:19ZImage-Guided Navigation in Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery using a Cranial Frame10.21608/esj.2019.6326.10802314-89502314-8969https://doaj.org/article/fe6e14874918404a8eaeddfbea2ced892019-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://esj.journals.ekb.eg/article_30588.htmlhttps://doaj.org/toc/2314-8950https://doaj.org/toc/2314-8969Background Data: Cervicothoracic, high thoracic, and craniocervical instrumented anterior spinal procedures pose a considerable challenge to the surgeon, mainly because intraoperative imaging by fluoroscopy is inadequate. To a certain extent the surgeon can make use of 3D-fluoroscopy for intraoperative control of the implants. To ease this process, the surgeon can make use of the so-called cranial frame which is attached to the Mayfield clamp, in combination with navigated 3D-fluoroscopy. The use of the cranial frame for navigated anterior craniocervical approaches as in the case of transnasal procedures at the clivus and foramen magnum is quite widespread. In the literature, the use of this technique for spine approaches is limited to a few case reports. Purpose: To present the feasibility of 3D-fluoroscopy navigation in anterior cervical spine procedures with the use of cranial frame. Study Design: Retrospective clinical case cohort. Patients and Methods: We present our experience in the technique of navigation in 5 patients of anterior cervical spine procedures. Anterior instrumented fusion in the cervicothoracic spine was performed in 4 patients and in the last patient anterior C1/2 fixation was performed. We used a system composed of Arcadis Orbic 3D C-arm by Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany, for acquisition of 3D images and the Stealth Station system by Medtronic Inc., Louisville, USA, for navigation. We used a so-called cranial frame for navigation that is fixed to the Mayfield head holder; a preoperative 3D scan was performed in some patients. The intraoperative 3D scan was performed after removal of the retractors, and additional 3D scan was beneficial in some patients during the surgical procedure. Results: Navigation was helpful in identification of the entry points and trajectories of the screws especially in the cervicothoracic region with no need for fluoroscopy. Additional advantage of the use of this system is the possibility of performing intraoperative 3D scan after instrumentation to verify hardware placement. Conclusion: The illustrated cases demonstrate the advantages of 3D-fluoroscopy navigation with use of the cranial frame in the upper transitional zones. Disadvantages of this method are the complex intraoperative draping and logistics and the possible inaccuracy because of long distances and spinal mobility. Carbon Mayfield may facilitate positioning but is not mandatory. (2018ESJ173) Ahmed R RizkAndy OttenbacherEgyptian Spine Associationarticlenavigation3D-fluoroscopycranial frameanterior cervical surgeryNeurology. Diseases of the nervous systemRC346-429ENEgyptian Spine Journal, Vol 29, Iss 1, Pp 56-65 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic navigation
3D-fluoroscopy
cranial frame
anterior cervical surgery
Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
RC346-429
spellingShingle navigation
3D-fluoroscopy
cranial frame
anterior cervical surgery
Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
RC346-429
Ahmed R Rizk
Andy Ottenbacher
Image-Guided Navigation in Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery using a Cranial Frame
description Background Data: Cervicothoracic, high thoracic, and craniocervical instrumented anterior spinal procedures pose a considerable challenge to the surgeon, mainly because intraoperative imaging by fluoroscopy is inadequate. To a certain extent the surgeon can make use of 3D-fluoroscopy for intraoperative control of the implants. To ease this process, the surgeon can make use of the so-called cranial frame which is attached to the Mayfield clamp, in combination with navigated 3D-fluoroscopy. The use of the cranial frame for navigated anterior craniocervical approaches as in the case of transnasal procedures at the clivus and foramen magnum is quite widespread. In the literature, the use of this technique for spine approaches is limited to a few case reports. Purpose: To present the feasibility of 3D-fluoroscopy navigation in anterior cervical spine procedures with the use of cranial frame. Study Design: Retrospective clinical case cohort. Patients and Methods: We present our experience in the technique of navigation in 5 patients of anterior cervical spine procedures. Anterior instrumented fusion in the cervicothoracic spine was performed in 4 patients and in the last patient anterior C1/2 fixation was performed. We used a system composed of Arcadis Orbic 3D C-arm by Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany, for acquisition of 3D images and the Stealth Station system by Medtronic Inc., Louisville, USA, for navigation. We used a so-called cranial frame for navigation that is fixed to the Mayfield head holder; a preoperative 3D scan was performed in some patients. The intraoperative 3D scan was performed after removal of the retractors, and additional 3D scan was beneficial in some patients during the surgical procedure. Results: Navigation was helpful in identification of the entry points and trajectories of the screws especially in the cervicothoracic region with no need for fluoroscopy. Additional advantage of the use of this system is the possibility of performing intraoperative 3D scan after instrumentation to verify hardware placement. Conclusion: The illustrated cases demonstrate the advantages of 3D-fluoroscopy navigation with use of the cranial frame in the upper transitional zones. Disadvantages of this method are the complex intraoperative draping and logistics and the possible inaccuracy because of long distances and spinal mobility. Carbon Mayfield may facilitate positioning but is not mandatory. (2018ESJ173)
format article
author Ahmed R Rizk
Andy Ottenbacher
author_facet Ahmed R Rizk
Andy Ottenbacher
author_sort Ahmed R Rizk
title Image-Guided Navigation in Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery using a Cranial Frame
title_short Image-Guided Navigation in Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery using a Cranial Frame
title_full Image-Guided Navigation in Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery using a Cranial Frame
title_fullStr Image-Guided Navigation in Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery using a Cranial Frame
title_full_unstemmed Image-Guided Navigation in Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery using a Cranial Frame
title_sort image-guided navigation in anterior cervical spine surgery using a cranial frame
publisher Egyptian Spine Association
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/fe6e14874918404a8eaeddfbea2ced89
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedrrizk imageguidednavigationinanteriorcervicalspinesurgeryusingacranialframe
AT andyottenbacher imageguidednavigationinanteriorcervicalspinesurgeryusingacranialframe
_version_ 1718398043512897536