Indoor Dust as a Matrix for Surveillance of COVID-19

ABSTRACT Ongoing disease surveillance is a critical tool to mitigate viral outbreaks, especially during a pandemic. Environmental monitoring has significant promise even following widespread vaccination among high-risk populations. The goal of this work is to demonstrate molecular severe acute respi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nicole Renninger, Nicholas Nastasi, Ashleigh Bope, Samuel J. Cochran, Sarah R. Haines, Neeraja Balasubrahmaniam, Katelyn Stuart, Aaron Bivins, Kyle Bibby, Natalie M. Hull, Karen C. Dannemiller
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/fe9381846dd64e40bac54ad7838d8c01
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:fe9381846dd64e40bac54ad7838d8c01
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:fe9381846dd64e40bac54ad7838d8c012021-12-02T19:36:39ZIndoor Dust as a Matrix for Surveillance of COVID-1910.1128/mSystems.01350-202379-5077https://doaj.org/article/fe9381846dd64e40bac54ad7838d8c012021-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/mSystems.01350-20https://doaj.org/toc/2379-5077ABSTRACT Ongoing disease surveillance is a critical tool to mitigate viral outbreaks, especially during a pandemic. Environmental monitoring has significant promise even following widespread vaccination among high-risk populations. The goal of this work is to demonstrate molecular severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) monitoring in bulk floor dust and related samples as a proof of concept of a noninvasive environmental surveillance methodology for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and potentially other viral diseases. Surface swab, passive sampler, and bulk floor dust samples were collected from the rooms of individuals positive for COVID-19, and SARS-CoV-2 was measured with quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-qPCR) and two digital PCR (dPCR) methods. Bulk dust samples had a geometric mean concentration of 163 copies/mg of dust and ranged from nondetects to 23,049 copies/mg of dust detected using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). An average of 89% of bulk dust samples were positive for the virus by the detection methods compared to 55% of surface swabs and fewer on the passive sampler (19% carpet, 29% polystyrene). In bulk dust, SARS-CoV-2 was detected in 76%, 93%, and 97% of samples measured by qPCR, chip-based dPCR, and droplet dPCR, respectively. Detectable viral RNA in the bulk vacuum bags did not measurably decay over 4 weeks, despite the application of a disinfectant before room cleaning. Future monitoring efforts should further evaluate RNA persistence and heterogeneity in dust. This study did not measure virus infectivity in dust or potential transmission associated with dust. Overall, this work demonstrates that bulk floor dust is a potentially useful matrix for long-term monitoring of viral disease in high-risk populations and buildings. IMPORTANCE Environmental surveillance to assess pathogen presence within a community is proving to be a critical tool to protect public health, and it is especially relevant during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Importantly, environmental surveillance tools also allow for the detection of asymptomatic disease carriers and for routine monitoring of a large number of people as has been shown for SARS-CoV-2 wastewater monitoring. However, additional monitoring techniques are needed to screen for outbreaks in high-risk settings such as congregate care facilities. Here, we demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 can be detected in bulk floor dust collected from rooms housing infected individuals. This analysis suggests that dust may be a useful and efficient matrix for routine surveillance of viral disease.Nicole RenningerNicholas NastasiAshleigh BopeSamuel J. CochranSarah R. HainesNeeraja BalasubrahmaniamKatelyn StuartAaron BivinsKyle BibbyNatalie M. HullKaren C. DannemillerAmerican Society for MicrobiologyarticleSARS-CoV-2COVID-19dustsurveillancevirusindoor environmentMicrobiologyQR1-502ENmSystems, Vol 6, Iss 2 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic SARS-CoV-2
COVID-19
dust
surveillance
virus
indoor environment
Microbiology
QR1-502
spellingShingle SARS-CoV-2
COVID-19
dust
surveillance
virus
indoor environment
Microbiology
QR1-502
Nicole Renninger
Nicholas Nastasi
Ashleigh Bope
Samuel J. Cochran
Sarah R. Haines
Neeraja Balasubrahmaniam
Katelyn Stuart
Aaron Bivins
Kyle Bibby
Natalie M. Hull
Karen C. Dannemiller
Indoor Dust as a Matrix for Surveillance of COVID-19
description ABSTRACT Ongoing disease surveillance is a critical tool to mitigate viral outbreaks, especially during a pandemic. Environmental monitoring has significant promise even following widespread vaccination among high-risk populations. The goal of this work is to demonstrate molecular severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) monitoring in bulk floor dust and related samples as a proof of concept of a noninvasive environmental surveillance methodology for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and potentially other viral diseases. Surface swab, passive sampler, and bulk floor dust samples were collected from the rooms of individuals positive for COVID-19, and SARS-CoV-2 was measured with quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-qPCR) and two digital PCR (dPCR) methods. Bulk dust samples had a geometric mean concentration of 163 copies/mg of dust and ranged from nondetects to 23,049 copies/mg of dust detected using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). An average of 89% of bulk dust samples were positive for the virus by the detection methods compared to 55% of surface swabs and fewer on the passive sampler (19% carpet, 29% polystyrene). In bulk dust, SARS-CoV-2 was detected in 76%, 93%, and 97% of samples measured by qPCR, chip-based dPCR, and droplet dPCR, respectively. Detectable viral RNA in the bulk vacuum bags did not measurably decay over 4 weeks, despite the application of a disinfectant before room cleaning. Future monitoring efforts should further evaluate RNA persistence and heterogeneity in dust. This study did not measure virus infectivity in dust or potential transmission associated with dust. Overall, this work demonstrates that bulk floor dust is a potentially useful matrix for long-term monitoring of viral disease in high-risk populations and buildings. IMPORTANCE Environmental surveillance to assess pathogen presence within a community is proving to be a critical tool to protect public health, and it is especially relevant during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Importantly, environmental surveillance tools also allow for the detection of asymptomatic disease carriers and for routine monitoring of a large number of people as has been shown for SARS-CoV-2 wastewater monitoring. However, additional monitoring techniques are needed to screen for outbreaks in high-risk settings such as congregate care facilities. Here, we demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 can be detected in bulk floor dust collected from rooms housing infected individuals. This analysis suggests that dust may be a useful and efficient matrix for routine surveillance of viral disease.
format article
author Nicole Renninger
Nicholas Nastasi
Ashleigh Bope
Samuel J. Cochran
Sarah R. Haines
Neeraja Balasubrahmaniam
Katelyn Stuart
Aaron Bivins
Kyle Bibby
Natalie M. Hull
Karen C. Dannemiller
author_facet Nicole Renninger
Nicholas Nastasi
Ashleigh Bope
Samuel J. Cochran
Sarah R. Haines
Neeraja Balasubrahmaniam
Katelyn Stuart
Aaron Bivins
Kyle Bibby
Natalie M. Hull
Karen C. Dannemiller
author_sort Nicole Renninger
title Indoor Dust as a Matrix for Surveillance of COVID-19
title_short Indoor Dust as a Matrix for Surveillance of COVID-19
title_full Indoor Dust as a Matrix for Surveillance of COVID-19
title_fullStr Indoor Dust as a Matrix for Surveillance of COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed Indoor Dust as a Matrix for Surveillance of COVID-19
title_sort indoor dust as a matrix for surveillance of covid-19
publisher American Society for Microbiology
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/fe9381846dd64e40bac54ad7838d8c01
work_keys_str_mv AT nicolerenninger indoordustasamatrixforsurveillanceofcovid19
AT nicholasnastasi indoordustasamatrixforsurveillanceofcovid19
AT ashleighbope indoordustasamatrixforsurveillanceofcovid19
AT samueljcochran indoordustasamatrixforsurveillanceofcovid19
AT sarahrhaines indoordustasamatrixforsurveillanceofcovid19
AT neerajabalasubrahmaniam indoordustasamatrixforsurveillanceofcovid19
AT katelynstuart indoordustasamatrixforsurveillanceofcovid19
AT aaronbivins indoordustasamatrixforsurveillanceofcovid19
AT kylebibby indoordustasamatrixforsurveillanceofcovid19
AT nataliemhull indoordustasamatrixforsurveillanceofcovid19
AT karencdannemiller indoordustasamatrixforsurveillanceofcovid19
_version_ 1718376360232091648