The employer potential of MOOCs: A mixed-methods study of human resource professionals’ thinking on MOOCs

While press coverage of MOOCs (massive open online courses) has been considerable and major MOOC providers are beginning to realize that employers may be a market for their courses, research on employers’ receptivity to using MOOCs is scarce. To help fill this gap, the Finding and Developing Talent...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alexandria Walton Radford, Jessica Robles, Stacey Cataylo, Laura Horn, Jessica Thornton, Keith E. Whitfield
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Athabasca University Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/fe99768dc4094a879c914eadbe820419
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:fe99768dc4094a879c914eadbe820419
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:fe99768dc4094a879c914eadbe8204192021-12-02T16:59:50ZThe employer potential of MOOCs: A mixed-methods study of human resource professionals’ thinking on MOOCs10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.18421492-3831https://doaj.org/article/fe99768dc4094a879c914eadbe8204192014-10-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1842https://doaj.org/toc/1492-3831 While press coverage of MOOCs (massive open online courses) has been considerable and major MOOC providers are beginning to realize that employers may be a market for their courses, research on employers’ receptivity to using MOOCs is scarce. To help fill this gap, the Finding and Developing Talent study surveyed 103 employers and interviewed a subset of 20 about their awareness of MOOCs and their receptivity to using MOOCs in recruiting, hiring, and professional development. Results showed that though awareness of MOOCs was relatively low (31% of the surveyed employers had heard of MOOCs), once they understood what they were, the employers perceived MOOCs positively in hiring decisions, viewing them mainly as indicating employees’ personal attributes like motivation and a desire to learn. A majority of employers (59%) were also receptive to using MOOCs for recruiting purposes—especially for staff with technical skills in high demand. Yet an even higher percentage (83%) were using, considering using, or could see their organization using MOOCs for professional development. Interviews with employers suggested that obtaining evidence about the quality of MOOCs, including the long-term learning and work performance gains that employees accrue from taking them, would increase employers’ use of MOOCs not just in professional development but also in recruiting and hiring. Alexandria Walton RadfordJessica RoblesStacey CatayloLaura HornJessica ThorntonKeith E. WhitfieldAthabasca University PressarticleMOOCsopen recruitmenthiringprofessional developmenthuman resourcesSpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691ENInternational Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, Vol 15, Iss 5 (2014)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic MOOCs
open recruitment
hiring
professional development
human resources
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
spellingShingle MOOCs
open recruitment
hiring
professional development
human resources
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Alexandria Walton Radford
Jessica Robles
Stacey Cataylo
Laura Horn
Jessica Thornton
Keith E. Whitfield
The employer potential of MOOCs: A mixed-methods study of human resource professionals’ thinking on MOOCs
description While press coverage of MOOCs (massive open online courses) has been considerable and major MOOC providers are beginning to realize that employers may be a market for their courses, research on employers’ receptivity to using MOOCs is scarce. To help fill this gap, the Finding and Developing Talent study surveyed 103 employers and interviewed a subset of 20 about their awareness of MOOCs and their receptivity to using MOOCs in recruiting, hiring, and professional development. Results showed that though awareness of MOOCs was relatively low (31% of the surveyed employers had heard of MOOCs), once they understood what they were, the employers perceived MOOCs positively in hiring decisions, viewing them mainly as indicating employees’ personal attributes like motivation and a desire to learn. A majority of employers (59%) were also receptive to using MOOCs for recruiting purposes—especially for staff with technical skills in high demand. Yet an even higher percentage (83%) were using, considering using, or could see their organization using MOOCs for professional development. Interviews with employers suggested that obtaining evidence about the quality of MOOCs, including the long-term learning and work performance gains that employees accrue from taking them, would increase employers’ use of MOOCs not just in professional development but also in recruiting and hiring.
format article
author Alexandria Walton Radford
Jessica Robles
Stacey Cataylo
Laura Horn
Jessica Thornton
Keith E. Whitfield
author_facet Alexandria Walton Radford
Jessica Robles
Stacey Cataylo
Laura Horn
Jessica Thornton
Keith E. Whitfield
author_sort Alexandria Walton Radford
title The employer potential of MOOCs: A mixed-methods study of human resource professionals’ thinking on MOOCs
title_short The employer potential of MOOCs: A mixed-methods study of human resource professionals’ thinking on MOOCs
title_full The employer potential of MOOCs: A mixed-methods study of human resource professionals’ thinking on MOOCs
title_fullStr The employer potential of MOOCs: A mixed-methods study of human resource professionals’ thinking on MOOCs
title_full_unstemmed The employer potential of MOOCs: A mixed-methods study of human resource professionals’ thinking on MOOCs
title_sort employer potential of moocs: a mixed-methods study of human resource professionals’ thinking on moocs
publisher Athabasca University Press
publishDate 2014
url https://doaj.org/article/fe99768dc4094a879c914eadbe820419
work_keys_str_mv AT alexandriawaltonradford theemployerpotentialofmoocsamixedmethodsstudyofhumanresourceprofessionalsthinkingonmoocs
AT jessicarobles theemployerpotentialofmoocsamixedmethodsstudyofhumanresourceprofessionalsthinkingonmoocs
AT staceycataylo theemployerpotentialofmoocsamixedmethodsstudyofhumanresourceprofessionalsthinkingonmoocs
AT laurahorn theemployerpotentialofmoocsamixedmethodsstudyofhumanresourceprofessionalsthinkingonmoocs
AT jessicathornton theemployerpotentialofmoocsamixedmethodsstudyofhumanresourceprofessionalsthinkingonmoocs
AT keithewhitfield theemployerpotentialofmoocsamixedmethodsstudyofhumanresourceprofessionalsthinkingonmoocs
AT alexandriawaltonradford employerpotentialofmoocsamixedmethodsstudyofhumanresourceprofessionalsthinkingonmoocs
AT jessicarobles employerpotentialofmoocsamixedmethodsstudyofhumanresourceprofessionalsthinkingonmoocs
AT staceycataylo employerpotentialofmoocsamixedmethodsstudyofhumanresourceprofessionalsthinkingonmoocs
AT laurahorn employerpotentialofmoocsamixedmethodsstudyofhumanresourceprofessionalsthinkingonmoocs
AT jessicathornton employerpotentialofmoocsamixedmethodsstudyofhumanresourceprofessionalsthinkingonmoocs
AT keithewhitfield employerpotentialofmoocsamixedmethodsstudyofhumanresourceprofessionalsthinkingonmoocs
_version_ 1718382307265478656