Optimized Mass Spectrometry Analysis Workflow with Polarimetric Guidance for ex vivo and in situ Sampling of Biological Tissues
Abstract Spatially Targeted Mass Spectrometry (MS) analysis using survey scans with an imaging modality often requires consecutive tissue slices, because of the tissue damage during survey scan or due to incompatible sample preparation requirements between the survey modality and MS. We report two s...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/fe9a5235053a499e85e2890aec692995 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:fe9a5235053a499e85e2890aec692995 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:fe9a5235053a499e85e2890aec6929952021-12-02T16:06:24ZOptimized Mass Spectrometry Analysis Workflow with Polarimetric Guidance for ex vivo and in situ Sampling of Biological Tissues10.1038/s41598-017-00272-y2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/fe9a5235053a499e85e2890aec6929952017-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00272-yhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Spatially Targeted Mass Spectrometry (MS) analysis using survey scans with an imaging modality often requires consecutive tissue slices, because of the tissue damage during survey scan or due to incompatible sample preparation requirements between the survey modality and MS. We report two spatially targeted MS analysis workflows based on polarized light imaging guidance that use the same tissue sample for survey and targeted analysis. The first workflow is applicable for thin-slice analysis, and uses transmission-polarimetry-guided Desorption ElectroSpray Ionization Mass Spectrometry (DESI-MS), and confirmatory H&E histopathology analysis on the same slice; this is validated using quantitative digital pathology methods. The second workflow explores a polarimetry-guided MS platform for thick tissue assessment by developing reflection-mode polarimetric imaging coupled with a hand-held Picosecond InfraRed Laser (PIRL) MS ablation probe that requires minimal tissue removal to produce detectable signal. Tissue differentiation within 5–10 s of sampling with the hand-held probe is shown using multivariate statistical methods of the MS profiles. Both workflows were tasked with differentiating necrotic cancer sites from viable cancers using a breast tumour model, and their performance was evaluated. The use of the same tissue surface addresses mismatches in guidance due to intrinsic changes in tissue morphology over consecutive sections.Michael WoolmanAdam GribbleEmma BluemkeJing ZouManuela VenturaNicholas BernardsMegan WuHoward J. GinsbergSunit DasAlex VitkinArash Zarrine-AfsarNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2017) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Michael Woolman Adam Gribble Emma Bluemke Jing Zou Manuela Ventura Nicholas Bernards Megan Wu Howard J. Ginsberg Sunit Das Alex Vitkin Arash Zarrine-Afsar Optimized Mass Spectrometry Analysis Workflow with Polarimetric Guidance for ex vivo and in situ Sampling of Biological Tissues |
description |
Abstract Spatially Targeted Mass Spectrometry (MS) analysis using survey scans with an imaging modality often requires consecutive tissue slices, because of the tissue damage during survey scan or due to incompatible sample preparation requirements between the survey modality and MS. We report two spatially targeted MS analysis workflows based on polarized light imaging guidance that use the same tissue sample for survey and targeted analysis. The first workflow is applicable for thin-slice analysis, and uses transmission-polarimetry-guided Desorption ElectroSpray Ionization Mass Spectrometry (DESI-MS), and confirmatory H&E histopathology analysis on the same slice; this is validated using quantitative digital pathology methods. The second workflow explores a polarimetry-guided MS platform for thick tissue assessment by developing reflection-mode polarimetric imaging coupled with a hand-held Picosecond InfraRed Laser (PIRL) MS ablation probe that requires minimal tissue removal to produce detectable signal. Tissue differentiation within 5–10 s of sampling with the hand-held probe is shown using multivariate statistical methods of the MS profiles. Both workflows were tasked with differentiating necrotic cancer sites from viable cancers using a breast tumour model, and their performance was evaluated. The use of the same tissue surface addresses mismatches in guidance due to intrinsic changes in tissue morphology over consecutive sections. |
format |
article |
author |
Michael Woolman Adam Gribble Emma Bluemke Jing Zou Manuela Ventura Nicholas Bernards Megan Wu Howard J. Ginsberg Sunit Das Alex Vitkin Arash Zarrine-Afsar |
author_facet |
Michael Woolman Adam Gribble Emma Bluemke Jing Zou Manuela Ventura Nicholas Bernards Megan Wu Howard J. Ginsberg Sunit Das Alex Vitkin Arash Zarrine-Afsar |
author_sort |
Michael Woolman |
title |
Optimized Mass Spectrometry Analysis Workflow with Polarimetric Guidance for ex vivo and in situ Sampling of Biological Tissues |
title_short |
Optimized Mass Spectrometry Analysis Workflow with Polarimetric Guidance for ex vivo and in situ Sampling of Biological Tissues |
title_full |
Optimized Mass Spectrometry Analysis Workflow with Polarimetric Guidance for ex vivo and in situ Sampling of Biological Tissues |
title_fullStr |
Optimized Mass Spectrometry Analysis Workflow with Polarimetric Guidance for ex vivo and in situ Sampling of Biological Tissues |
title_full_unstemmed |
Optimized Mass Spectrometry Analysis Workflow with Polarimetric Guidance for ex vivo and in situ Sampling of Biological Tissues |
title_sort |
optimized mass spectrometry analysis workflow with polarimetric guidance for ex vivo and in situ sampling of biological tissues |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/fe9a5235053a499e85e2890aec692995 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT michaelwoolman optimizedmassspectrometryanalysisworkflowwithpolarimetricguidanceforexvivoandinsitusamplingofbiologicaltissues AT adamgribble optimizedmassspectrometryanalysisworkflowwithpolarimetricguidanceforexvivoandinsitusamplingofbiologicaltissues AT emmabluemke optimizedmassspectrometryanalysisworkflowwithpolarimetricguidanceforexvivoandinsitusamplingofbiologicaltissues AT jingzou optimizedmassspectrometryanalysisworkflowwithpolarimetricguidanceforexvivoandinsitusamplingofbiologicaltissues AT manuelaventura optimizedmassspectrometryanalysisworkflowwithpolarimetricguidanceforexvivoandinsitusamplingofbiologicaltissues AT nicholasbernards optimizedmassspectrometryanalysisworkflowwithpolarimetricguidanceforexvivoandinsitusamplingofbiologicaltissues AT meganwu optimizedmassspectrometryanalysisworkflowwithpolarimetricguidanceforexvivoandinsitusamplingofbiologicaltissues AT howardjginsberg optimizedmassspectrometryanalysisworkflowwithpolarimetricguidanceforexvivoandinsitusamplingofbiologicaltissues AT sunitdas optimizedmassspectrometryanalysisworkflowwithpolarimetricguidanceforexvivoandinsitusamplingofbiologicaltissues AT alexvitkin optimizedmassspectrometryanalysisworkflowwithpolarimetricguidanceforexvivoandinsitusamplingofbiologicaltissues AT arashzarrineafsar optimizedmassspectrometryanalysisworkflowwithpolarimetricguidanceforexvivoandinsitusamplingofbiologicaltissues |
_version_ |
1718385065633775616 |