Optimized Mass Spectrometry Analysis Workflow with Polarimetric Guidance for ex vivo and in situ Sampling of Biological Tissues

Abstract Spatially Targeted Mass Spectrometry (MS) analysis using survey scans with an imaging modality often requires consecutive tissue slices, because of the tissue damage during survey scan or due to incompatible sample preparation requirements between the survey modality and MS. We report two s...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michael Woolman, Adam Gribble, Emma Bluemke, Jing Zou, Manuela Ventura, Nicholas Bernards, Megan Wu, Howard J. Ginsberg, Sunit Das, Alex Vitkin, Arash Zarrine-Afsar
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2017
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/fe9a5235053a499e85e2890aec692995
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:fe9a5235053a499e85e2890aec692995
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:fe9a5235053a499e85e2890aec6929952021-12-02T16:06:24ZOptimized Mass Spectrometry Analysis Workflow with Polarimetric Guidance for ex vivo and in situ Sampling of Biological Tissues10.1038/s41598-017-00272-y2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/fe9a5235053a499e85e2890aec6929952017-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00272-yhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Spatially Targeted Mass Spectrometry (MS) analysis using survey scans with an imaging modality often requires consecutive tissue slices, because of the tissue damage during survey scan or due to incompatible sample preparation requirements between the survey modality and MS. We report two spatially targeted MS analysis workflows based on polarized light imaging guidance that use the same tissue sample for survey and targeted analysis. The first workflow is applicable for thin-slice analysis, and uses transmission-polarimetry-guided Desorption ElectroSpray Ionization Mass Spectrometry (DESI-MS), and confirmatory H&E histopathology analysis on the same slice; this is validated using quantitative digital pathology methods. The second workflow explores a polarimetry-guided MS platform for thick tissue assessment by developing reflection-mode polarimetric imaging coupled with a hand-held Picosecond InfraRed Laser (PIRL) MS ablation probe that requires minimal tissue removal to produce detectable signal. Tissue differentiation within 5–10 s of sampling with the hand-held probe is shown using multivariate statistical methods of the MS profiles. Both workflows were tasked with differentiating necrotic cancer sites from viable cancers using a breast tumour model, and their performance was evaluated. The use of the same tissue surface addresses mismatches in guidance due to intrinsic changes in tissue morphology over consecutive sections.Michael WoolmanAdam GribbleEmma BluemkeJing ZouManuela VenturaNicholas BernardsMegan WuHoward J. GinsbergSunit DasAlex VitkinArash Zarrine-AfsarNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Michael Woolman
Adam Gribble
Emma Bluemke
Jing Zou
Manuela Ventura
Nicholas Bernards
Megan Wu
Howard J. Ginsberg
Sunit Das
Alex Vitkin
Arash Zarrine-Afsar
Optimized Mass Spectrometry Analysis Workflow with Polarimetric Guidance for ex vivo and in situ Sampling of Biological Tissues
description Abstract Spatially Targeted Mass Spectrometry (MS) analysis using survey scans with an imaging modality often requires consecutive tissue slices, because of the tissue damage during survey scan or due to incompatible sample preparation requirements between the survey modality and MS. We report two spatially targeted MS analysis workflows based on polarized light imaging guidance that use the same tissue sample for survey and targeted analysis. The first workflow is applicable for thin-slice analysis, and uses transmission-polarimetry-guided Desorption ElectroSpray Ionization Mass Spectrometry (DESI-MS), and confirmatory H&E histopathology analysis on the same slice; this is validated using quantitative digital pathology methods. The second workflow explores a polarimetry-guided MS platform for thick tissue assessment by developing reflection-mode polarimetric imaging coupled with a hand-held Picosecond InfraRed Laser (PIRL) MS ablation probe that requires minimal tissue removal to produce detectable signal. Tissue differentiation within 5–10 s of sampling with the hand-held probe is shown using multivariate statistical methods of the MS profiles. Both workflows were tasked with differentiating necrotic cancer sites from viable cancers using a breast tumour model, and their performance was evaluated. The use of the same tissue surface addresses mismatches in guidance due to intrinsic changes in tissue morphology over consecutive sections.
format article
author Michael Woolman
Adam Gribble
Emma Bluemke
Jing Zou
Manuela Ventura
Nicholas Bernards
Megan Wu
Howard J. Ginsberg
Sunit Das
Alex Vitkin
Arash Zarrine-Afsar
author_facet Michael Woolman
Adam Gribble
Emma Bluemke
Jing Zou
Manuela Ventura
Nicholas Bernards
Megan Wu
Howard J. Ginsberg
Sunit Das
Alex Vitkin
Arash Zarrine-Afsar
author_sort Michael Woolman
title Optimized Mass Spectrometry Analysis Workflow with Polarimetric Guidance for ex vivo and in situ Sampling of Biological Tissues
title_short Optimized Mass Spectrometry Analysis Workflow with Polarimetric Guidance for ex vivo and in situ Sampling of Biological Tissues
title_full Optimized Mass Spectrometry Analysis Workflow with Polarimetric Guidance for ex vivo and in situ Sampling of Biological Tissues
title_fullStr Optimized Mass Spectrometry Analysis Workflow with Polarimetric Guidance for ex vivo and in situ Sampling of Biological Tissues
title_full_unstemmed Optimized Mass Spectrometry Analysis Workflow with Polarimetric Guidance for ex vivo and in situ Sampling of Biological Tissues
title_sort optimized mass spectrometry analysis workflow with polarimetric guidance for ex vivo and in situ sampling of biological tissues
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/fe9a5235053a499e85e2890aec692995
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelwoolman optimizedmassspectrometryanalysisworkflowwithpolarimetricguidanceforexvivoandinsitusamplingofbiologicaltissues
AT adamgribble optimizedmassspectrometryanalysisworkflowwithpolarimetricguidanceforexvivoandinsitusamplingofbiologicaltissues
AT emmabluemke optimizedmassspectrometryanalysisworkflowwithpolarimetricguidanceforexvivoandinsitusamplingofbiologicaltissues
AT jingzou optimizedmassspectrometryanalysisworkflowwithpolarimetricguidanceforexvivoandinsitusamplingofbiologicaltissues
AT manuelaventura optimizedmassspectrometryanalysisworkflowwithpolarimetricguidanceforexvivoandinsitusamplingofbiologicaltissues
AT nicholasbernards optimizedmassspectrometryanalysisworkflowwithpolarimetricguidanceforexvivoandinsitusamplingofbiologicaltissues
AT meganwu optimizedmassspectrometryanalysisworkflowwithpolarimetricguidanceforexvivoandinsitusamplingofbiologicaltissues
AT howardjginsberg optimizedmassspectrometryanalysisworkflowwithpolarimetricguidanceforexvivoandinsitusamplingofbiologicaltissues
AT sunitdas optimizedmassspectrometryanalysisworkflowwithpolarimetricguidanceforexvivoandinsitusamplingofbiologicaltissues
AT alexvitkin optimizedmassspectrometryanalysisworkflowwithpolarimetricguidanceforexvivoandinsitusamplingofbiologicaltissues
AT arashzarrineafsar optimizedmassspectrometryanalysisworkflowwithpolarimetricguidanceforexvivoandinsitusamplingofbiologicaltissues
_version_ 1718385065633775616