Self-Reported and Device-Measured Physical Activity in Leisure Time and at Work and Associations with Cardiovascular Events—A Prospective Study of the Physical Activity Paradox

The beneficial health effects of physical activity, in particular moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), are well documented, but there is an ongoing scientific debate whether the domain matters, i.e., whether leisure time physical activity is beneficial and occupational physical activity is...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Roman P. Kuster, Philip von Rosen, Wilhelmus J. A. Grooten, Ing-Mari Dohrn, Maria Hagströmer
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	MDPI AG 2021
Materias:	attitude behavior and change study cardiovascular disease cox proportional hazard ratio leisure time physical activity Medicine R
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/febf9b5bfd7546f4801681506bec4b25
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:febf9b5bfd7546f4801681506bec4b25
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:febf9b5bfd7546f4801681506bec4b252021-11-25T17:52:03ZSelf-Reported and Device-Measured Physical Activity in Leisure Time and at Work and Associations with Cardiovascular Events—A Prospective Study of the Physical Activity Paradox10.3390/ijerph1822122141660-46011661-7827https://doaj.org/article/febf9b5bfd7546f4801681506bec4b252021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/22/12214https://doaj.org/toc/1661-7827https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601The beneficial health effects of physical activity, in particular moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), are well documented, but there is an ongoing scientific debate whether the domain matters, i.e., whether leisure time physical activity is beneficial and occupational physical activity is detrimental to health, referred to as the physical activity paradox. The present study, therefore, analyzed the association between self-reported and device-measured physical activity and cardiovascular events in both domains. A representative sample of 807 individuals was followed for 14.6 ± 1.1 years, in which 59 cardiovascular events occurred. For self-reported data, Cox proportional hazard models showed no effect of physical activity in leisure and at work, while for device-measured MVPA, beneficial associations with total time spent in MVPA and occupational time spent in MVPA were found, but not for leisure time spent in MVPA. When accounting for both domains in the same model, the associations disappeared. These results indicate that it matters how physical activity is measured and that MVPA is beneficial for cardiovascular health, but the domain in which MVPA occurs does not seem to matter.Roman P. KusterPhilip von RosenWilhelmus J. A. GrootenIng-Mari DohrnMaria HagströmerMDPI AGarticleattitudebehaviorand change studycardiovascular diseasecox proportional hazard ratioleisure time physical activityMedicineRENInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol 18, Iss 12214, p 12214 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	attitude behavior and change study cardiovascular disease cox proportional hazard ratio leisure time physical activity Medicine R
spellingShingle	attitude behavior and change study cardiovascular disease cox proportional hazard ratio leisure time physical activity Medicine R Roman P. Kuster Philip von Rosen Wilhelmus J. A. Grooten Ing-Mari Dohrn Maria Hagströmer Self-Reported and Device-Measured Physical Activity in Leisure Time and at Work and Associations with Cardiovascular Events—A Prospective Study of the Physical Activity Paradox
description	The beneficial health effects of physical activity, in particular moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), are well documented, but there is an ongoing scientific debate whether the domain matters, i.e., whether leisure time physical activity is beneficial and occupational physical activity is detrimental to health, referred to as the physical activity paradox. The present study, therefore, analyzed the association between self-reported and device-measured physical activity and cardiovascular events in both domains. A representative sample of 807 individuals was followed for 14.6 ± 1.1 years, in which 59 cardiovascular events occurred. For self-reported data, Cox proportional hazard models showed no effect of physical activity in leisure and at work, while for device-measured MVPA, beneficial associations with total time spent in MVPA and occupational time spent in MVPA were found, but not for leisure time spent in MVPA. When accounting for both domains in the same model, the associations disappeared. These results indicate that it matters how physical activity is measured and that MVPA is beneficial for cardiovascular health, but the domain in which MVPA occurs does not seem to matter.
format	article
author	Roman P. Kuster Philip von Rosen Wilhelmus J. A. Grooten Ing-Mari Dohrn Maria Hagströmer
author_facet	Roman P. Kuster Philip von Rosen Wilhelmus J. A. Grooten Ing-Mari Dohrn Maria Hagströmer
author_sort	Roman P. Kuster
title	Self-Reported and Device-Measured Physical Activity in Leisure Time and at Work and Associations with Cardiovascular Events—A Prospective Study of the Physical Activity Paradox
title_short	Self-Reported and Device-Measured Physical Activity in Leisure Time and at Work and Associations with Cardiovascular Events—A Prospective Study of the Physical Activity Paradox
title_full	Self-Reported and Device-Measured Physical Activity in Leisure Time and at Work and Associations with Cardiovascular Events—A Prospective Study of the Physical Activity Paradox
title_fullStr	Self-Reported and Device-Measured Physical Activity in Leisure Time and at Work and Associations with Cardiovascular Events—A Prospective Study of the Physical Activity Paradox
title_full_unstemmed	Self-Reported and Device-Measured Physical Activity in Leisure Time and at Work and Associations with Cardiovascular Events—A Prospective Study of the Physical Activity Paradox
title_sort	self-reported and device-measured physical activity in leisure time and at work and associations with cardiovascular events—a prospective study of the physical activity paradox
publisher	MDPI AG
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/febf9b5bfd7546f4801681506bec4b25
work_keys_str_mv	AT romanpkuster selfreportedanddevicemeasuredphysicalactivityinleisuretimeandatworkandassociationswithcardiovasculareventsaprospectivestudyofthephysicalactivityparadox AT philipvonrosen selfreportedanddevicemeasuredphysicalactivityinleisuretimeandatworkandassociationswithcardiovasculareventsaprospectivestudyofthephysicalactivityparadox AT wilhelmusjagrooten selfreportedanddevicemeasuredphysicalactivityinleisuretimeandatworkandassociationswithcardiovasculareventsaprospectivestudyofthephysicalactivityparadox AT ingmaridohrn selfreportedanddevicemeasuredphysicalactivityinleisuretimeandatworkandassociationswithcardiovasculareventsaprospectivestudyofthephysicalactivityparadox AT mariahagstromer selfreportedanddevicemeasuredphysicalactivityinleisuretimeandatworkandassociationswithcardiovasculareventsaprospectivestudyofthephysicalactivityparadox
_version_	1718411962421870592

Self-Reported and Device-Measured Physical Activity in Leisure Time and at Work and Associations with Cardiovascular Events—A Prospective Study of the Physical Activity Paradox

Ejemplares similares