A nonrandomized, open-label study to evaluate the effect of nasal stimulation on tear production in subjects with dry eye disease
Neil J Friedman,1 Karla Butron,2 Nora Robledo,2 James Loudin,3 Stephanie N Baba,3 Arturo Chayet2 1Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Mid-Peninsula Ophthalmology Medical Group, Palo Alto, CA, USA; 2Codet Vision Institute, Tijuana, Mexico; 3Oculeve, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Friedman NJ, Butron K, Robledo N, Loudin J, Baba SN, Chayet A |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/ff5dd93d21b04a0a846d1df7089c8366 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Comparison of 0.2% and 0.18% hyaluronate eye drops in patients with moderate to severe dry eye with keratitis or keratoconjunctivitis
por: Groß D, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Stimulating Tear Production: Spotlight on Neurostimulation
por: Yu MD, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Efficacy of an Intranasal Tear Neurostimulator in Sjögren Syndrome Patients
por: Lilley J, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Preclinical Efficacy Comparison of Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Solution 0.09% vs Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion 0.05% vs Ciclosporin Ophthalmic Emulsion 0.1% in a NOD Mouse Model of Dry Eye Disease
por: Burade V, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Acupuncture and dry eye: current perspectives. A double-blinded randomized controlled trial and review of the literature
por: Dhaliwal DK, et al.
Publicado: (2019)