Evaluation of ERIC-PCR as genotyping method for Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis isolates.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the Enterobacterial Repetitive Intergenic Consensus (ERIC-PCR) as a tool for molecular typing of C. pseudotuberculosis isolates from eight different hosts in twelve countries. Ninety-nine C. pseudotuberculosis field strains, one type strain (ATCC 19410T) and one...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elaine M S Dorneles, Jordana A Santana, Dayana Ribeiro, Fernanda Alves Dorella, Alessandro S Guimarães, Mohamed S Moawad, Salah A Selim, Ana Luiza M Garaldi, Anderson Miyoshi, Márcio G Ribeiro, Aurora M G Gouveia, Vasco Azevedo, Marcos B Heinemann, Andrey P Lage
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/ff95efcdbe8b476089f32c131cc1bbd3
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:ff95efcdbe8b476089f32c131cc1bbd3
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:ff95efcdbe8b476089f32c131cc1bbd32021-11-18T08:17:01ZEvaluation of ERIC-PCR as genotyping method for Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis isolates.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0098758https://doaj.org/article/ff95efcdbe8b476089f32c131cc1bbd32014-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24901343/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203The aim of this study was to evaluate the Enterobacterial Repetitive Intergenic Consensus (ERIC-PCR) as a tool for molecular typing of C. pseudotuberculosis isolates from eight different hosts in twelve countries. Ninety-nine C. pseudotuberculosis field strains, one type strain (ATCC 19410T) and one vaccine strain (1002) were fingerprinted using the ERIC-1R and ERIC-2 primers, and the ERIC-1R+ERIC-2 primer pair. Twenty-nine different genotypes were generated by ERIC 1-PCR, 28 by ERIC 2-PCR and 35 by ERIC 1+2-PCR. The discriminatory index calculated for ERIC 1, ERIC 2, and ERIC 1+2-PCR was 0.89, 0.86, and 0.92, respectively. Epidemiological concordance was established for all ERIC-PCR assays. ERIC 1+2-PCR was defined as the best method based on suitability of the amplification patterns and discriminatory index. Minimal spanning tree for ERIC 1+2-PCR revealed three major clonal complexes and clustering around nitrate-positive (biovar Equi) and nitrate-negative (biovar Ovis) strains. Therefore, ERIC 1+2-PCR proved to be the best technique evaluated in this study for genotyping C. pseudotuberculosis strains, due to its usefulness for molecular epidemiology investigations.Elaine M S DornelesJordana A SantanaDayana RibeiroFernanda Alves DorellaAlessandro S GuimarãesMohamed S MoawadSalah A SelimAna Luiza M GaraldiAnderson MiyoshiMárcio G RibeiroAurora M G GouveiaVasco AzevedoMarcos B HeinemannAndrey P LagePublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 9, Iss 6, p e98758 (2014)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Elaine M S Dorneles
Jordana A Santana
Dayana Ribeiro
Fernanda Alves Dorella
Alessandro S Guimarães
Mohamed S Moawad
Salah A Selim
Ana Luiza M Garaldi
Anderson Miyoshi
Márcio G Ribeiro
Aurora M G Gouveia
Vasco Azevedo
Marcos B Heinemann
Andrey P Lage
Evaluation of ERIC-PCR as genotyping method for Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis isolates.
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the Enterobacterial Repetitive Intergenic Consensus (ERIC-PCR) as a tool for molecular typing of C. pseudotuberculosis isolates from eight different hosts in twelve countries. Ninety-nine C. pseudotuberculosis field strains, one type strain (ATCC 19410T) and one vaccine strain (1002) were fingerprinted using the ERIC-1R and ERIC-2 primers, and the ERIC-1R+ERIC-2 primer pair. Twenty-nine different genotypes were generated by ERIC 1-PCR, 28 by ERIC 2-PCR and 35 by ERIC 1+2-PCR. The discriminatory index calculated for ERIC 1, ERIC 2, and ERIC 1+2-PCR was 0.89, 0.86, and 0.92, respectively. Epidemiological concordance was established for all ERIC-PCR assays. ERIC 1+2-PCR was defined as the best method based on suitability of the amplification patterns and discriminatory index. Minimal spanning tree for ERIC 1+2-PCR revealed three major clonal complexes and clustering around nitrate-positive (biovar Equi) and nitrate-negative (biovar Ovis) strains. Therefore, ERIC 1+2-PCR proved to be the best technique evaluated in this study for genotyping C. pseudotuberculosis strains, due to its usefulness for molecular epidemiology investigations.
format article
author Elaine M S Dorneles
Jordana A Santana
Dayana Ribeiro
Fernanda Alves Dorella
Alessandro S Guimarães
Mohamed S Moawad
Salah A Selim
Ana Luiza M Garaldi
Anderson Miyoshi
Márcio G Ribeiro
Aurora M G Gouveia
Vasco Azevedo
Marcos B Heinemann
Andrey P Lage
author_facet Elaine M S Dorneles
Jordana A Santana
Dayana Ribeiro
Fernanda Alves Dorella
Alessandro S Guimarães
Mohamed S Moawad
Salah A Selim
Ana Luiza M Garaldi
Anderson Miyoshi
Márcio G Ribeiro
Aurora M G Gouveia
Vasco Azevedo
Marcos B Heinemann
Andrey P Lage
author_sort Elaine M S Dorneles
title Evaluation of ERIC-PCR as genotyping method for Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis isolates.
title_short Evaluation of ERIC-PCR as genotyping method for Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis isolates.
title_full Evaluation of ERIC-PCR as genotyping method for Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis isolates.
title_fullStr Evaluation of ERIC-PCR as genotyping method for Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis isolates.
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of ERIC-PCR as genotyping method for Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis isolates.
title_sort evaluation of eric-pcr as genotyping method for corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis isolates.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2014
url https://doaj.org/article/ff95efcdbe8b476089f32c131cc1bbd3
work_keys_str_mv AT elainemsdorneles evaluationofericpcrasgenotypingmethodforcorynebacteriumpseudotuberculosisisolates
AT jordanaasantana evaluationofericpcrasgenotypingmethodforcorynebacteriumpseudotuberculosisisolates
AT dayanaribeiro evaluationofericpcrasgenotypingmethodforcorynebacteriumpseudotuberculosisisolates
AT fernandaalvesdorella evaluationofericpcrasgenotypingmethodforcorynebacteriumpseudotuberculosisisolates
AT alessandrosguimaraes evaluationofericpcrasgenotypingmethodforcorynebacteriumpseudotuberculosisisolates
AT mohamedsmoawad evaluationofericpcrasgenotypingmethodforcorynebacteriumpseudotuberculosisisolates
AT salahaselim evaluationofericpcrasgenotypingmethodforcorynebacteriumpseudotuberculosisisolates
AT analuizamgaraldi evaluationofericpcrasgenotypingmethodforcorynebacteriumpseudotuberculosisisolates
AT andersonmiyoshi evaluationofericpcrasgenotypingmethodforcorynebacteriumpseudotuberculosisisolates
AT marciogribeiro evaluationofericpcrasgenotypingmethodforcorynebacteriumpseudotuberculosisisolates
AT auroramggouveia evaluationofericpcrasgenotypingmethodforcorynebacteriumpseudotuberculosisisolates
AT vascoazevedo evaluationofericpcrasgenotypingmethodforcorynebacteriumpseudotuberculosisisolates
AT marcosbheinemann evaluationofericpcrasgenotypingmethodforcorynebacteriumpseudotuberculosisisolates
AT andreyplage evaluationofericpcrasgenotypingmethodforcorynebacteriumpseudotuberculosisisolates
_version_ 1718422023664828416