Evaluation of ERIC-PCR as genotyping method for Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis isolates.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the Enterobacterial Repetitive Intergenic Consensus (ERIC-PCR) as a tool for molecular typing of C. pseudotuberculosis isolates from eight different hosts in twelve countries. Ninety-nine C. pseudotuberculosis field strains, one type strain (ATCC 19410T) and one...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/ff95efcdbe8b476089f32c131cc1bbd3 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:ff95efcdbe8b476089f32c131cc1bbd3 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:ff95efcdbe8b476089f32c131cc1bbd32021-11-18T08:17:01ZEvaluation of ERIC-PCR as genotyping method for Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis isolates.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0098758https://doaj.org/article/ff95efcdbe8b476089f32c131cc1bbd32014-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24901343/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203The aim of this study was to evaluate the Enterobacterial Repetitive Intergenic Consensus (ERIC-PCR) as a tool for molecular typing of C. pseudotuberculosis isolates from eight different hosts in twelve countries. Ninety-nine C. pseudotuberculosis field strains, one type strain (ATCC 19410T) and one vaccine strain (1002) were fingerprinted using the ERIC-1R and ERIC-2 primers, and the ERIC-1R+ERIC-2 primer pair. Twenty-nine different genotypes were generated by ERIC 1-PCR, 28 by ERIC 2-PCR and 35 by ERIC 1+2-PCR. The discriminatory index calculated for ERIC 1, ERIC 2, and ERIC 1+2-PCR was 0.89, 0.86, and 0.92, respectively. Epidemiological concordance was established for all ERIC-PCR assays. ERIC 1+2-PCR was defined as the best method based on suitability of the amplification patterns and discriminatory index. Minimal spanning tree for ERIC 1+2-PCR revealed three major clonal complexes and clustering around nitrate-positive (biovar Equi) and nitrate-negative (biovar Ovis) strains. Therefore, ERIC 1+2-PCR proved to be the best technique evaluated in this study for genotyping C. pseudotuberculosis strains, due to its usefulness for molecular epidemiology investigations.Elaine M S DornelesJordana A SantanaDayana RibeiroFernanda Alves DorellaAlessandro S GuimarãesMohamed S MoawadSalah A SelimAna Luiza M GaraldiAnderson MiyoshiMárcio G RibeiroAurora M G GouveiaVasco AzevedoMarcos B HeinemannAndrey P LagePublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 9, Iss 6, p e98758 (2014) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Elaine M S Dorneles Jordana A Santana Dayana Ribeiro Fernanda Alves Dorella Alessandro S Guimarães Mohamed S Moawad Salah A Selim Ana Luiza M Garaldi Anderson Miyoshi Márcio G Ribeiro Aurora M G Gouveia Vasco Azevedo Marcos B Heinemann Andrey P Lage Evaluation of ERIC-PCR as genotyping method for Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis isolates. |
description |
The aim of this study was to evaluate the Enterobacterial Repetitive Intergenic Consensus (ERIC-PCR) as a tool for molecular typing of C. pseudotuberculosis isolates from eight different hosts in twelve countries. Ninety-nine C. pseudotuberculosis field strains, one type strain (ATCC 19410T) and one vaccine strain (1002) were fingerprinted using the ERIC-1R and ERIC-2 primers, and the ERIC-1R+ERIC-2 primer pair. Twenty-nine different genotypes were generated by ERIC 1-PCR, 28 by ERIC 2-PCR and 35 by ERIC 1+2-PCR. The discriminatory index calculated for ERIC 1, ERIC 2, and ERIC 1+2-PCR was 0.89, 0.86, and 0.92, respectively. Epidemiological concordance was established for all ERIC-PCR assays. ERIC 1+2-PCR was defined as the best method based on suitability of the amplification patterns and discriminatory index. Minimal spanning tree for ERIC 1+2-PCR revealed three major clonal complexes and clustering around nitrate-positive (biovar Equi) and nitrate-negative (biovar Ovis) strains. Therefore, ERIC 1+2-PCR proved to be the best technique evaluated in this study for genotyping C. pseudotuberculosis strains, due to its usefulness for molecular epidemiology investigations. |
format |
article |
author |
Elaine M S Dorneles Jordana A Santana Dayana Ribeiro Fernanda Alves Dorella Alessandro S Guimarães Mohamed S Moawad Salah A Selim Ana Luiza M Garaldi Anderson Miyoshi Márcio G Ribeiro Aurora M G Gouveia Vasco Azevedo Marcos B Heinemann Andrey P Lage |
author_facet |
Elaine M S Dorneles Jordana A Santana Dayana Ribeiro Fernanda Alves Dorella Alessandro S Guimarães Mohamed S Moawad Salah A Selim Ana Luiza M Garaldi Anderson Miyoshi Márcio G Ribeiro Aurora M G Gouveia Vasco Azevedo Marcos B Heinemann Andrey P Lage |
author_sort |
Elaine M S Dorneles |
title |
Evaluation of ERIC-PCR as genotyping method for Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis isolates. |
title_short |
Evaluation of ERIC-PCR as genotyping method for Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis isolates. |
title_full |
Evaluation of ERIC-PCR as genotyping method for Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis isolates. |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of ERIC-PCR as genotyping method for Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis isolates. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of ERIC-PCR as genotyping method for Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis isolates. |
title_sort |
evaluation of eric-pcr as genotyping method for corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis isolates. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/ff95efcdbe8b476089f32c131cc1bbd3 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT elainemsdorneles evaluationofericpcrasgenotypingmethodforcorynebacteriumpseudotuberculosisisolates AT jordanaasantana evaluationofericpcrasgenotypingmethodforcorynebacteriumpseudotuberculosisisolates AT dayanaribeiro evaluationofericpcrasgenotypingmethodforcorynebacteriumpseudotuberculosisisolates AT fernandaalvesdorella evaluationofericpcrasgenotypingmethodforcorynebacteriumpseudotuberculosisisolates AT alessandrosguimaraes evaluationofericpcrasgenotypingmethodforcorynebacteriumpseudotuberculosisisolates AT mohamedsmoawad evaluationofericpcrasgenotypingmethodforcorynebacteriumpseudotuberculosisisolates AT salahaselim evaluationofericpcrasgenotypingmethodforcorynebacteriumpseudotuberculosisisolates AT analuizamgaraldi evaluationofericpcrasgenotypingmethodforcorynebacteriumpseudotuberculosisisolates AT andersonmiyoshi evaluationofericpcrasgenotypingmethodforcorynebacteriumpseudotuberculosisisolates AT marciogribeiro evaluationofericpcrasgenotypingmethodforcorynebacteriumpseudotuberculosisisolates AT auroramggouveia evaluationofericpcrasgenotypingmethodforcorynebacteriumpseudotuberculosisisolates AT vascoazevedo evaluationofericpcrasgenotypingmethodforcorynebacteriumpseudotuberculosisisolates AT marcosbheinemann evaluationofericpcrasgenotypingmethodforcorynebacteriumpseudotuberculosisisolates AT andreyplage evaluationofericpcrasgenotypingmethodforcorynebacteriumpseudotuberculosisisolates |
_version_ |
1718422023664828416 |