A Possibilidade do Tratamento de Conflitos no Âmbito do Judiciário por Meio da Teoria dos Jogos
Currently, is clear the concern about the effectiveness/quality in the court provides which have the contention model characterised by opposition of interests between the parties, who expect by the State that must say whom has reason. For the treatment of conflicts, the State traditionally proposes...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | article |
| Language: | PT |
| Published: |
Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul
2009
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doaj.org/article/ffab56302f02411baff39e45678fe8b4 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Currently, is clear the concern about the effectiveness/quality in the court provides which have the contention model characterised by opposition of interests between the parties, who expect by the State that must say whom has reason. For the treatment of conflicts, the State traditionally proposes the Judiciary, that should "say the Right" when render a judgement, in case of nonaccomplishment spontaneous of the regulatory laws by the individuals. The theme of this article involves the possibilities of build a new model to deal with conflicts from the ideas incorporated by the "game theory" of John Nash front the prostration of the traditional forms of action in the jurisdiction, unable to deal with the complexity of the contemporaneous social relations, marked by an atmosphere of crisis in the modern institutions. |
|---|