A Possibilidade do Tratamento de Conflitos no Âmbito do Judiciário por Meio da Teoria dos Jogos
Currently, is clear the concern about the effectiveness/quality in the court provides which have the contention model characterised by opposition of interests between the parties, who expect by the State that must say whom has reason. For the treatment of conflicts, the State traditionally proposes...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | PT |
Publicado: |
Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/ffab56302f02411baff39e45678fe8b4 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Sumario: | Currently, is clear the concern about the effectiveness/quality in the court provides which have the contention model characterised by opposition of interests between the parties, who expect by the State that must say whom has reason. For the treatment of conflicts, the State traditionally proposes the Judiciary, that should "say the Right" when render a judgement, in case of nonaccomplishment spontaneous of the regulatory laws by the individuals. The theme of this article involves the possibilities of build a new model to deal with conflicts from the ideas incorporated by the "game theory" of John Nash front the prostration of the traditional forms of action in the jurisdiction, unable to deal with the complexity of the contemporaneous social relations, marked by an atmosphere of crisis in the modern institutions. |
---|