Distance Learners’ Use of Handheld Technologies

This study investigates how and where distance learners use handheld devices and the impact this has on learning habits, access to learning content and quality of work. It analyses the spatial dimension of anytime-anywhere learning and, with a focus on anywhere learning, it explores students’ ongoi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simon Cross, Mike Sharples, Graham Healing, Jim Ellis
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Athabasca University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/ffbc17f87bc44a22b74803a009fe5ffb
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:ffbc17f87bc44a22b74803a009fe5ffb
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:ffbc17f87bc44a22b74803a009fe5ffb2021-12-02T18:02:59ZDistance Learners’ Use of Handheld Technologies10.19173/irrodl.v20i2.40401492-3831https://doaj.org/article/ffbc17f87bc44a22b74803a009fe5ffb2019-04-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/4040https://doaj.org/toc/1492-3831 This study investigates how and where distance learners use handheld devices and the impact this has on learning habits, access to learning content and quality of work. It analyses the spatial dimension of anytime-anywhere learning and, with a focus on anywhere learning, it explores students’ ongoing negotiation of the flow between and across study locations. The study concludes by proposing two new concepts: the flow of places and place of space. These should help direct the framing of future studies into the places, spaces, and mobility of formal and informal seamless learning. A dataset comprising 446 responses from undergraduate students enrolled at the UK’s largest distance learning university was analysed in respect to three research questions. All age groups, study levels, and disciplines were represented. Five key findings are: most students now use handheld devices for study-related learning; the distribution of study-related learning tasks was similar in all seven study places; there is a strong, statistically-significant correlation between the number of study places in which handheld devices are used and the number of study task types performed; two fifths of students using a handheld device for learning have noticed a change in study habit and benefit to learning; and multiple regression analysis shows three variables (number of study places, number of study tasks, and change in study habits) are predictors of finding it easier to access learning materials and improved quality of learners’ work. Simon CrossMike SharplesGraham HealingJim EllisAthabasca University Pressarticlemobile learningseamless learningstudy spacehandheld learning technologiesanywhere learningdistance educationSpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691ENInternational Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, Vol 20, Iss 2 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic mobile learning
seamless learning
study space
handheld learning technologies
anywhere learning
distance education
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
spellingShingle mobile learning
seamless learning
study space
handheld learning technologies
anywhere learning
distance education
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Simon Cross
Mike Sharples
Graham Healing
Jim Ellis
Distance Learners’ Use of Handheld Technologies
description This study investigates how and where distance learners use handheld devices and the impact this has on learning habits, access to learning content and quality of work. It analyses the spatial dimension of anytime-anywhere learning and, with a focus on anywhere learning, it explores students’ ongoing negotiation of the flow between and across study locations. The study concludes by proposing two new concepts: the flow of places and place of space. These should help direct the framing of future studies into the places, spaces, and mobility of formal and informal seamless learning. A dataset comprising 446 responses from undergraduate students enrolled at the UK’s largest distance learning university was analysed in respect to three research questions. All age groups, study levels, and disciplines were represented. Five key findings are: most students now use handheld devices for study-related learning; the distribution of study-related learning tasks was similar in all seven study places; there is a strong, statistically-significant correlation between the number of study places in which handheld devices are used and the number of study task types performed; two fifths of students using a handheld device for learning have noticed a change in study habit and benefit to learning; and multiple regression analysis shows three variables (number of study places, number of study tasks, and change in study habits) are predictors of finding it easier to access learning materials and improved quality of learners’ work.
format article
author Simon Cross
Mike Sharples
Graham Healing
Jim Ellis
author_facet Simon Cross
Mike Sharples
Graham Healing
Jim Ellis
author_sort Simon Cross
title Distance Learners’ Use of Handheld Technologies
title_short Distance Learners’ Use of Handheld Technologies
title_full Distance Learners’ Use of Handheld Technologies
title_fullStr Distance Learners’ Use of Handheld Technologies
title_full_unstemmed Distance Learners’ Use of Handheld Technologies
title_sort distance learners’ use of handheld technologies
publisher Athabasca University Press
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/ffbc17f87bc44a22b74803a009fe5ffb
work_keys_str_mv AT simoncross distancelearnersuseofhandheldtechnologies
AT mikesharples distancelearnersuseofhandheldtechnologies
AT grahamhealing distancelearnersuseofhandheldtechnologies
AT jimellis distancelearnersuseofhandheldtechnologies
_version_ 1718378846907006976