Security First
Couched in moral language and endeavoring to preempt possible shifts in foreign policy attitudes, this six-part book attempts to subtly and indirectly weave Israeli interests into American policy and upcoming decision-making processes. Essentially, it repackages Israel’s “security for peace” formul...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
International Institute of Islamic Thought
2009
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/ffc0a4133d1548a29bc7b030a8be54b3 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | Couched in moral language and endeavoring to preempt possible shifts in
foreign policy attitudes, this six-part book attempts to subtly and indirectly
weave Israeli interests into American policy and upcoming decision-making
processes. Essentially, it repackages Israel’s “security for peace” formula
with the language of security (read “order”) and democracy (read “justice/
law”) and stresses the former’s priority over the latter – security being Israel’s
paramount claim. In so doing, Etzioni seeks to limit references to Israel to
give the reader the impression that he is dealing with issues over and beyond
– a form of reorienting the reader’s attention through focal deception while
“playing the same tune – on a different instrument” (p. xii).
The book’s main thesis is that there are “principled” and “pragmatic”
reasons forWashington to transform its foreign policy approach from prioritizing
the spread of democracy to security (p. xi), for democracy must follow
the establishment of “basic security” (p. xi) as the supreme human good.
Doing things differently simply reflects the “Multiple Realism Deficiency
Disorder” from which American foreign policy suffers (p. xiv), namely, a
psychological state that deals with matters as Americans would like them to
be rather than as they are (p. xv) ...
|
|---|