Concordancia diagnóstica del puntaje de Gleason en biopsia por punción y prostatectomía radical y sus consecuencias clínicas
Background: The Gleason histological score is an independent prognostic factor in prostate cancer that helps in therapeutic decisions. Aim: To analyze the concordance between the Gleason score of needle prostatic biopsy and the score from the study of the surgical piece obtained during radical prost...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | Spanish / Castilian |
Publicado: |
Sociedad Médica de Santiago
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872004000800009 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:scielo:S0034-98872004000800009 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:scielo:S0034-988720040008000092014-08-14Concordancia diagnóstica del puntaje de Gleason en biopsia por punción y prostatectomía radical y sus consecuencias clínicasArellano H,LeonardoCastillo C,OctavioMetrebián B,Esteban Biopsy, needle Prostatectomy Prostatic neoplasms Urogenital surgical procedures Background: The Gleason histological score is an independent prognostic factor in prostate cancer that helps in therapeutic decisions. Aim: To analyze the concordance between the Gleason score of needle prostatic biopsy and the score from the study of the surgical piece obtained during radical prostatectomy. Material and methods: Retrospective analysis of 212 cases of prostate cancer, diagnosed between February 1993 and March 2003. All had the Gleason histological scores from needle prostatic biopsies and in the surgical piece obtained during radical prostatectomy. All pathological studies were done by the same observer. Results: There was an exact concordance of Gleason scores between needle biopsy and the surgical piece in 49% of cases and a concordance of ± 1 unit in 89%. The concordance improved in the second half of the study period. No cases with a Gleason score of less than 5 were detected since 1999 in the surgical piece. Conclusions: The concordance of Gleason score of needle prostatic biopsies and surgical pieces is good. This concordance increases with the experience of the pathologist (Rev Méd Chile 2004; 132: 971-8)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedad Médica de SantiagoRevista médica de Chile v.132 n.8 20042004-08-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872004000800009es10.4067/S0034-98872004000800009 |
institution |
Scielo Chile |
collection |
Scielo Chile |
language |
Spanish / Castilian |
topic |
Biopsy, needle Prostatectomy Prostatic neoplasms Urogenital surgical procedures |
spellingShingle |
Biopsy, needle Prostatectomy Prostatic neoplasms Urogenital surgical procedures Arellano H,Leonardo Castillo C,Octavio Metrebián B,Esteban Concordancia diagnóstica del puntaje de Gleason en biopsia por punción y prostatectomía radical y sus consecuencias clínicas |
description |
Background: The Gleason histological score is an independent prognostic factor in prostate cancer that helps in therapeutic decisions. Aim: To analyze the concordance between the Gleason score of needle prostatic biopsy and the score from the study of the surgical piece obtained during radical prostatectomy. Material and methods: Retrospective analysis of 212 cases of prostate cancer, diagnosed between February 1993 and March 2003. All had the Gleason histological scores from needle prostatic biopsies and in the surgical piece obtained during radical prostatectomy. All pathological studies were done by the same observer. Results: There was an exact concordance of Gleason scores between needle biopsy and the surgical piece in 49% of cases and a concordance of ± 1 unit in 89%. The concordance improved in the second half of the study period. No cases with a Gleason score of less than 5 were detected since 1999 in the surgical piece. Conclusions: The concordance of Gleason score of needle prostatic biopsies and surgical pieces is good. This concordance increases with the experience of the pathologist (Rev Méd Chile 2004; 132: 971-8) |
author |
Arellano H,Leonardo Castillo C,Octavio Metrebián B,Esteban |
author_facet |
Arellano H,Leonardo Castillo C,Octavio Metrebián B,Esteban |
author_sort |
Arellano H,Leonardo |
title |
Concordancia diagnóstica del puntaje de Gleason en biopsia por punción y prostatectomía radical y sus consecuencias clínicas |
title_short |
Concordancia diagnóstica del puntaje de Gleason en biopsia por punción y prostatectomía radical y sus consecuencias clínicas |
title_full |
Concordancia diagnóstica del puntaje de Gleason en biopsia por punción y prostatectomía radical y sus consecuencias clínicas |
title_fullStr |
Concordancia diagnóstica del puntaje de Gleason en biopsia por punción y prostatectomía radical y sus consecuencias clínicas |
title_full_unstemmed |
Concordancia diagnóstica del puntaje de Gleason en biopsia por punción y prostatectomía radical y sus consecuencias clínicas |
title_sort |
concordancia diagnóstica del puntaje de gleason en biopsia por punción y prostatectomía radical y sus consecuencias clínicas |
publisher |
Sociedad Médica de Santiago |
publishDate |
2004 |
url |
http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872004000800009 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT arellanohleonardo concordanciadiagnosticadelpuntajedegleasonenbiopsiaporpuncionyprostatectomiaradicalysusconsecuenciasclinicas AT castillococtavio concordanciadiagnosticadelpuntajedegleasonenbiopsiaporpuncionyprostatectomiaradicalysusconsecuenciasclinicas AT metrebianbesteban concordanciadiagnosticadelpuntajedegleasonenbiopsiaporpuncionyprostatectomiaradicalysusconsecuenciasclinicas |
_version_ |
1718436162743304192 |