Los Comités de de Ética Asistencial y las repercusiones jurídicas de sus informes

Clinical Ethics Committees and Research Ethics Committees have their own specific roles. The Clinical Ethics Committee's pronouncements have an advisory function, whereas Research Ethics Committees' decisions are binding. This article analyzes the legal impact of the Clinical Ethics Commit...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Couceiro V,Azucena, Beca I,Juan Pablo
Lenguaje:	Spanish / Castilian
Publicado:	Sociedad Médica de Santiago 2006
Materias:	Ethics committees, clinical Ethics committees, research Medico legal aspects Professional staff committees
Acceso en línea:	http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872006000400016
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:scielo:S0034-98872006000400016
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:scielo:S0034-988720060004000162014-01-23Los Comités de de Ética Asistencial y las repercusiones jurídicas de sus informesCouceiro V,AzucenaBeca I,Juan Pablo Ethics committees, clinical Ethics committees, research Medico legal aspects Professional staff committees Clinical Ethics Committees and Research Ethics Committees have their own specific roles. The Clinical Ethics Committee's pronouncements have an advisory function, whereas Research Ethics Committees' decisions are binding. This article analyzes the legal impact of the Clinical Ethics Committees' reports. Legal and medical reasoning share the same practical nature. Both can have several correct answers to the same situation. Clinical Ethics Committees deliberate about these alternatives and analyze the involved values. Their conclusions are non-compulsory recommendations. They do not replace nor diminish the doctor's personal responsibility. Even though the Clinical Ethics Committees' reports are not binding, they constitute a sort of "expert's opinion", expressed by qualified professionals, who assume their own professional responsibility as advisors. The members' behavior is necessarily subject to constitutional and legal regulations. When judges review the Clinical Ethics Committee's reports, they must realize that their nature is advisory, and also consider them an essential element to reduce the gap between the medical and legal fields. In this way, the problem of increasingly transforming medicine into a legal issue can be preventedinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedad Médica de SantiagoRevista médica de Chile v.134 n.4 20062006-04-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872006000400016es10.4067/S0034-98872006000400016
institution	Scielo Chile
collection	Scielo Chile
language	Spanish / Castilian
topic	Ethics committees, clinical Ethics committees, research Medico legal aspects Professional staff committees
spellingShingle	Ethics committees, clinical Ethics committees, research Medico legal aspects Professional staff committees Couceiro V,Azucena Beca I,Juan Pablo Los Comités de de Ética Asistencial y las repercusiones jurídicas de sus informes
description	Clinical Ethics Committees and Research Ethics Committees have their own specific roles. The Clinical Ethics Committee's pronouncements have an advisory function, whereas Research Ethics Committees' decisions are binding. This article analyzes the legal impact of the Clinical Ethics Committees' reports. Legal and medical reasoning share the same practical nature. Both can have several correct answers to the same situation. Clinical Ethics Committees deliberate about these alternatives and analyze the involved values. Their conclusions are non-compulsory recommendations. They do not replace nor diminish the doctor's personal responsibility. Even though the Clinical Ethics Committees' reports are not binding, they constitute a sort of "expert's opinion", expressed by qualified professionals, who assume their own professional responsibility as advisors. The members' behavior is necessarily subject to constitutional and legal regulations. When judges review the Clinical Ethics Committee's reports, they must realize that their nature is advisory, and also consider them an essential element to reduce the gap between the medical and legal fields. In this way, the problem of increasingly transforming medicine into a legal issue can be prevented
author	Couceiro V,Azucena Beca I,Juan Pablo
author_facet	Couceiro V,Azucena Beca I,Juan Pablo
author_sort	Couceiro V,Azucena
title	Los Comités de de Ética Asistencial y las repercusiones jurídicas de sus informes
title_short	Los Comités de de Ética Asistencial y las repercusiones jurídicas de sus informes
title_full	Los Comités de de Ética Asistencial y las repercusiones jurídicas de sus informes
title_fullStr	Los Comités de de Ética Asistencial y las repercusiones jurídicas de sus informes
title_full_unstemmed	Los Comités de de Ética Asistencial y las repercusiones jurídicas de sus informes
title_sort	los comités de de ética asistencial y las repercusiones jurídicas de sus informes
publisher	Sociedad Médica de Santiago
publishDate	2006
url	http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872006000400016
work_keys_str_mv	AT couceirovazucena loscomitesdedeeticaasistencialylasrepercusionesjuridicasdesusinformes AT becaijuanpablo loscomitesdedeeticaasistencialylasrepercusionesjuridicasdesusinformes
_version_	1718436257954004992

Los Comités de de Ética Asistencial y las repercusiones jurídicas de sus informes

Ejemplares similares