Seguimiento en fase aguda de catéteres electrodos de estimulación endocavitaria permanente: Comparación de tres modelos

Background: Electrode lead design and materials influence their performance, stability and manipulation characteristics. In our laboratory, we use straight intracardiac, active fixation, steroid eluting leads. These features are shared by three brands of pacemarker distributors. Aim: To compare the...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Frangini S,Patricia, Vergara S,Ismael, González A,Rolando, Fajuri N,Alejandro, Baeza L,Mariana
Lenguaje:	Spanish / Castilian
Publicado:	Sociedad Médica de Santiago 2006
Materias:	Cardiac pacemaker, artificial Defibrillators, implantable Heart block
Acceso en línea:	http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872006001100010
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:scielo:S0034-98872006001100010
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:scielo:S0034-988720060011000102014-01-24Seguimiento en fase aguda de catéteres electrodos de estimulación endocavitaria permanente: Comparación de tres modelosFrangini S,PatriciaVergara S,IsmaelGonzález A,RolandoFajuri N,AlejandroBaeza L,Mariana Cardiac pacemaker, artificial Defibrillators, implantable Heart block Background: Electrode lead design and materials influence their performance, stability and manipulation characteristics. In our laboratory, we use straight intracardiac, active fixation, steroid eluting leads. These features are shared by three brands of pacemarker distributors. Aim: To compare the short term results of three brands of leads used in our laboratory in patients requiring the implant of a pacemarker of cardioverter. Material and methods: One hundred and four patients (mean age 70 years, 59 males) subjected to a pacemarker or cardioverter implant were studied and followed during the first three months post implant. In these patients, 49 Guidant Flextend® 4087 or 4088, 27 Saint Jude Tendril® 1488T and 10 Medtronic Capsurefix® 5076 leads were implanted in the right atrium and 60 Guidant Flextend® 4087 or 4088, 29 Saint Jude Tendril® 1488T and 19 Medtronic Capsurefix® 5076 leads were implanted in the right ventricle. Results: Implant parameters were adequate for all leads. A sub-acute rise in ventricular stimulation threshold was detected in one Flextrend® lead. Three atrial leads (two Flextend® and one Capsurefix®) and one Capsurefix® ventricular lead experienced an acute displacement. One patient with a Flextend® lead, had a cardiac tamponade caused by an atrial perforation. Conclusions: The three brands of leads tested can be successfully implanted with comparable parameters and without differences in the evolution of patients during the first three monthsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedad Médica de SantiagoRevista médica de Chile v.134 n.11 20062006-11-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872006001100010es10.4067/S0034-98872006001100010
institution	Scielo Chile
collection	Scielo Chile
language	Spanish / Castilian
topic	Cardiac pacemaker, artificial Defibrillators, implantable Heart block
spellingShingle	Cardiac pacemaker, artificial Defibrillators, implantable Heart block Frangini S,Patricia Vergara S,Ismael González A,Rolando Fajuri N,Alejandro Baeza L,Mariana Seguimiento en fase aguda de catéteres electrodos de estimulación endocavitaria permanente: Comparación de tres modelos
description	Background: Electrode lead design and materials influence their performance, stability and manipulation characteristics. In our laboratory, we use straight intracardiac, active fixation, steroid eluting leads. These features are shared by three brands of pacemarker distributors. Aim: To compare the short term results of three brands of leads used in our laboratory in patients requiring the implant of a pacemarker of cardioverter. Material and methods: One hundred and four patients (mean age 70 years, 59 males) subjected to a pacemarker or cardioverter implant were studied and followed during the first three months post implant. In these patients, 49 Guidant Flextend® 4087 or 4088, 27 Saint Jude Tendril® 1488T and 10 Medtronic Capsurefix® 5076 leads were implanted in the right atrium and 60 Guidant Flextend® 4087 or 4088, 29 Saint Jude Tendril® 1488T and 19 Medtronic Capsurefix® 5076 leads were implanted in the right ventricle. Results: Implant parameters were adequate for all leads. A sub-acute rise in ventricular stimulation threshold was detected in one Flextrend® lead. Three atrial leads (two Flextend® and one Capsurefix®) and one Capsurefix® ventricular lead experienced an acute displacement. One patient with a Flextend® lead, had a cardiac tamponade caused by an atrial perforation. Conclusions: The three brands of leads tested can be successfully implanted with comparable parameters and without differences in the evolution of patients during the first three months
author	Frangini S,Patricia Vergara S,Ismael González A,Rolando Fajuri N,Alejandro Baeza L,Mariana
author_facet	Frangini S,Patricia Vergara S,Ismael González A,Rolando Fajuri N,Alejandro Baeza L,Mariana
author_sort	Frangini S,Patricia
title	Seguimiento en fase aguda de catéteres electrodos de estimulación endocavitaria permanente: Comparación de tres modelos
title_short	Seguimiento en fase aguda de catéteres electrodos de estimulación endocavitaria permanente: Comparación de tres modelos
title_full	Seguimiento en fase aguda de catéteres electrodos de estimulación endocavitaria permanente: Comparación de tres modelos
title_fullStr	Seguimiento en fase aguda de catéteres electrodos de estimulación endocavitaria permanente: Comparación de tres modelos
title_full_unstemmed	Seguimiento en fase aguda de catéteres electrodos de estimulación endocavitaria permanente: Comparación de tres modelos
title_sort	seguimiento en fase aguda de catéteres electrodos de estimulación endocavitaria permanente: comparación de tres modelos
publisher	Sociedad Médica de Santiago
publishDate	2006
url	http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872006001100010
work_keys_str_mv	AT franginispatricia seguimientoenfaseagudadecatetereselectrodosdeestimulacionendocavitariapermanentecomparaciondetresmodelos AT vergarasismael seguimientoenfaseagudadecatetereselectrodosdeestimulacionendocavitariapermanentecomparaciondetresmodelos AT gonzalezarolando seguimientoenfaseagudadecatetereselectrodosdeestimulacionendocavitariapermanentecomparaciondetresmodelos AT fajurinalejandro seguimientoenfaseagudadecatetereselectrodosdeestimulacionendocavitariapermanentecomparaciondetresmodelos AT baezalmariana seguimientoenfaseagudadecatetereselectrodosdeestimulacionendocavitariapermanentecomparaciondetresmodelos
_version_	1718436293223907328

Seguimiento en fase aguda de catéteres electrodos de estimulación endocavitaria permanente: Comparación de tres modelos

Ejemplares similares