Honestidad y buena fe: dos pilares en la ética de las publicaciones biomédicas

The editors of medical journals should take the steps necessary to assure its readers that the contents of their publications are based in true data, that they are original and fulfill the ethical rules of biomedical and clinical research, including its reporting. This editors role has become incre...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Reyes B,Humberto
Lenguaje:	Spanish / Castilian
Publicado:	Sociedad Médica de Santiago 2007
Materias:	Ethics Journalism Peer review Practice guidelines (Publication type) Scientific misconduct
Acceso en línea:	http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872007000400001
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:scielo:S0034-98872007000400001
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:scielo:S0034-988720070004000012014-01-06Honestidad y buena fe: dos pilares en la ética de las publicaciones biomédicasReyes B,Humberto Ethics Journalism Peer review Practice guidelines (Publication type) Scientific misconduct The editors of medical journals should take the steps necessary to assure its readers that the contents of their publications are based in true data, that they are original and fulfill the ethical rules of biomedical and clinical research, including its reporting. This editors role has become increasingly difficult since the pressure to publish scientific papers is progressively stimulated by the role that those papers play in curricula vitae when the authors apply for university positions, academic promotions, research grants and for their personal prestige. As a consequence, increasing instances of misconduct in scientific publications are detected. Some cases are noticed during the editorial process, mostly when peer reviewers identify redundant publications or plagiarism. Other cases are denounced after a manuscript was published. It is the editors duty to verify the misconduct, request an explanation from the authors and, if their answer is unsatisfactory, report the problem to the institutional authorities supporting the authors. The editors should denounce the situation in a forthcoming issue of the journal. Universities should enforce the teaching of ethical rules that govern the report of scientific information. Revista Médica de Chile follows recommendations given by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, the World Association of Medical Editors and other groups, but honesty and good faith in all the actors involved in the process of biomedical publications (authors, reviewers, editors) remain the cornerstones of scientific good behaviorinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedad Médica de SantiagoRevista médica de Chile v.135 n.4 20072007-04-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872007000400001es10.4067/S0034-98872007000400001
institution	Scielo Chile
collection	Scielo Chile
language	Spanish / Castilian
topic	Ethics Journalism Peer review Practice guidelines (Publication type) Scientific misconduct
spellingShingle	Ethics Journalism Peer review Practice guidelines (Publication type) Scientific misconduct Reyes B,Humberto Honestidad y buena fe: dos pilares en la ética de las publicaciones biomédicas
description	The editors of medical journals should take the steps necessary to assure its readers that the contents of their publications are based in true data, that they are original and fulfill the ethical rules of biomedical and clinical research, including its reporting. This editors role has become increasingly difficult since the pressure to publish scientific papers is progressively stimulated by the role that those papers play in curricula vitae when the authors apply for university positions, academic promotions, research grants and for their personal prestige. As a consequence, increasing instances of misconduct in scientific publications are detected. Some cases are noticed during the editorial process, mostly when peer reviewers identify redundant publications or plagiarism. Other cases are denounced after a manuscript was published. It is the editors duty to verify the misconduct, request an explanation from the authors and, if their answer is unsatisfactory, report the problem to the institutional authorities supporting the authors. The editors should denounce the situation in a forthcoming issue of the journal. Universities should enforce the teaching of ethical rules that govern the report of scientific information. Revista Médica de Chile follows recommendations given by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, the World Association of Medical Editors and other groups, but honesty and good faith in all the actors involved in the process of biomedical publications (authors, reviewers, editors) remain the cornerstones of scientific good behavior
author	Reyes B,Humberto
author_facet	Reyes B,Humberto
author_sort	Reyes B,Humberto
title	Honestidad y buena fe: dos pilares en la ética de las publicaciones biomédicas
title_short	Honestidad y buena fe: dos pilares en la ética de las publicaciones biomédicas
title_full	Honestidad y buena fe: dos pilares en la ética de las publicaciones biomédicas
title_fullStr	Honestidad y buena fe: dos pilares en la ética de las publicaciones biomédicas
title_full_unstemmed	Honestidad y buena fe: dos pilares en la ética de las publicaciones biomédicas
title_sort	honestidad y buena fe: dos pilares en la ética de las publicaciones biomédicas
publisher	Sociedad Médica de Santiago
publishDate	2007
url	http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872007000400001
work_keys_str_mv	AT reyesbhumberto honestidadybuenafedospilaresenlaeticadelaspublicacionesbiomedicas
_version_	1718436313789628416

Honestidad y buena fe: dos pilares en la ética de las publicaciones biomédicas

Ejemplares similares