Análisis crítico de un artículo: ¿Es confiable la medición de adenosin deaminasa (ADA) para el diagnóstico de derrame pleural tuberculoso?

Background: Conventional tests are not always helpful in making a diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy. Many studies have investigated the usefulness of adenosine deaminase (ADA) in pleural fluid for the early diagnosis of tuberculous pleuresy. We conducted a metaanalysis to determine the accuracy of A...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Herrera R,Cristian, Aravena L,Carlos
Lenguaje:Spanish / Castilian
Publicado: Sociedad Médica de Santiago 2009
Acceso en línea:http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872009000200019
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:scielo:S0034-98872009000200019
record_format dspace
spelling oai:scielo:S0034-988720090002000192009-06-10Análisis crítico de un artículo: ¿Es confiable la medición de adenosin deaminasa (ADA) para el diagnóstico de derrame pleural tuberculoso?Herrera R,CristianAravena L,CarlosBackground: Conventional tests are not always helpful in making a diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy. Many studies have investigated the usefulness of adenosine deaminase (ADA) in pleural fluid for the early diagnosis of tuberculous pleuresy. We conducted a metaanalysis to determine the accuracy of ADA measurements in the diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy. Methods: After a systematic review of English ¡anguage studies, sensitivity, speciñcity and other measures of accuracy of ADA concentration in the diagnosis of pleural effusion were pooled using random effects models. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves were used to summarize overall test performance. Results: Sixty-three studies met our inclusión criteria. The summary estimates for ADA in the diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy in the studies included were sensitivity 0.92 (95% confidence interval 0.90-0.93), speciñcity 0.90 (95% confidence interval 0.89-0.91), positive likelihood ratio 9.03 (95% confidence interval 7.19-11.35), negative likelihood ratio 0.10 (95% confidence interval 0.07-0.14), and diagnostic odds ratio 110.08 (95% confidence interval 69.96-173.20). Conclusions: ADA determination is a relative sensitive and speciñc test for the diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy. Measurement of ADA in pleural effusion is thus likely to be a useful diagnostic tool for tuberculous plerisy. The results of ADA assays should be interpreted in parallel with clinical findings and the results of conventional testsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedad Médica de SantiagoRevista médica de Chile v.137 n.2 20092009-02-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872009000200019es10.4067/S0034-98872009000200019
institution Scielo Chile
collection Scielo Chile
language Spanish / Castilian
description Background: Conventional tests are not always helpful in making a diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy. Many studies have investigated the usefulness of adenosine deaminase (ADA) in pleural fluid for the early diagnosis of tuberculous pleuresy. We conducted a metaanalysis to determine the accuracy of ADA measurements in the diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy. Methods: After a systematic review of English ¡anguage studies, sensitivity, speciñcity and other measures of accuracy of ADA concentration in the diagnosis of pleural effusion were pooled using random effects models. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves were used to summarize overall test performance. Results: Sixty-three studies met our inclusión criteria. The summary estimates for ADA in the diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy in the studies included were sensitivity 0.92 (95% confidence interval 0.90-0.93), speciñcity 0.90 (95% confidence interval 0.89-0.91), positive likelihood ratio 9.03 (95% confidence interval 7.19-11.35), negative likelihood ratio 0.10 (95% confidence interval 0.07-0.14), and diagnostic odds ratio 110.08 (95% confidence interval 69.96-173.20). Conclusions: ADA determination is a relative sensitive and speciñc test for the diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy. Measurement of ADA in pleural effusion is thus likely to be a useful diagnostic tool for tuberculous plerisy. The results of ADA assays should be interpreted in parallel with clinical findings and the results of conventional tests
author Herrera R,Cristian
Aravena L,Carlos
spellingShingle Herrera R,Cristian
Aravena L,Carlos
Análisis crítico de un artículo: ¿Es confiable la medición de adenosin deaminasa (ADA) para el diagnóstico de derrame pleural tuberculoso?
author_facet Herrera R,Cristian
Aravena L,Carlos
author_sort Herrera R,Cristian
title Análisis crítico de un artículo: ¿Es confiable la medición de adenosin deaminasa (ADA) para el diagnóstico de derrame pleural tuberculoso?
title_short Análisis crítico de un artículo: ¿Es confiable la medición de adenosin deaminasa (ADA) para el diagnóstico de derrame pleural tuberculoso?
title_full Análisis crítico de un artículo: ¿Es confiable la medición de adenosin deaminasa (ADA) para el diagnóstico de derrame pleural tuberculoso?
title_fullStr Análisis crítico de un artículo: ¿Es confiable la medición de adenosin deaminasa (ADA) para el diagnóstico de derrame pleural tuberculoso?
title_full_unstemmed Análisis crítico de un artículo: ¿Es confiable la medición de adenosin deaminasa (ADA) para el diagnóstico de derrame pleural tuberculoso?
title_sort análisis crítico de un artículo: ¿es confiable la medición de adenosin deaminasa (ada) para el diagnóstico de derrame pleural tuberculoso?
publisher Sociedad Médica de Santiago
publishDate 2009
url http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872009000200019
work_keys_str_mv AT herrerarcristian analisiscriticodeunarticuloesconfiablelamediciondeadenosindeaminasaadaparaeldiagnosticodederramepleuraltuberculoso
AT aravenalcarlos analisiscriticodeunarticuloesconfiablelamediciondeadenosindeaminasaadaparaeldiagnosticodederramepleuraltuberculoso
_version_ 1718436430086144000