Validación del Cuestionario de Maltrato entre Iguales por Abuso de Poder (MIAP) para escolares
Background: Bullying is common in schools and has negative consequences. It can be assessed using a self-reported instrument. Aim: To validate a Spanish self-reporting tool called Survey of High School Bullying Abuse of Power (MIAP). Material and Methods: The instrument has 13 questions, of which...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Lenguaje: | Spanish / Castilian |
| Publicado: |
Sociedad Médica de Santiago
2011
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872011000400009 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:scielo:S0034-98872011000400009 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:scielo:S0034-988720110004000092011-08-25Validación del Cuestionario de Maltrato entre Iguales por Abuso de Poder (MIAP) para escolaresLecannelier,FelipeVarela,JorgeRodríguez,JorgeHoffmann,MarianelaFlores,FernandaAscanio,Lorena Bullying Questionnaires Schools Background: Bullying is common in schools and has negative consequences. It can be assessed using a self-reported instrument. Aim: To validate a Spanish self-reporting tool called Survey of High School Bullying Abuse of Power (MIAP). Material and Methods: The instrument has 13 questions, of which 7 are multiple choice, rende-ring a total of 49 items. It was applied to 2.341 children of seventh and eighth grade attending private, subsidized and municipal schools in the city of Concepción, Chile. Expert judge analysis and estimated reliability using the Cronbach Alpha were used to validate the survey. Results: The instrument obtained a Cronbach Alpha coeffcient of 0.8892, classifed as good. This analysis generated four scales that explained 30.9% of the variance. They were called Witness Bullying with 18 items, accounting for 11.4% of the variance, Bullying Victim with 12 items, accounting for 7.5% of the variance, Bullying Perpetrator and Severe bullying Victim, with 10 items explaining 6.4% of the variance and Aggressor Bullying with 6 items accounting for 5.7% of the variance. Conclusions: The MIAP can recognize four basic factors that facilitate the analysis and understanding of bullying, with good levels of reliability and validity. The remaining questions also deliver valuable information.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedad Médica de SantiagoRevista médica de Chile v.139 n.4 20112011-04-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872011000400009es10.4067/S0034-98872011000400009 |
| institution |
Scielo Chile |
| collection |
Scielo Chile |
| language |
Spanish / Castilian |
| topic |
Bullying Questionnaires Schools |
| spellingShingle |
Bullying Questionnaires Schools Lecannelier,Felipe Varela,Jorge Rodríguez,Jorge Hoffmann,Marianela Flores,Fernanda Ascanio,Lorena Validación del Cuestionario de Maltrato entre Iguales por Abuso de Poder (MIAP) para escolares |
| description |
Background: Bullying is common in schools and has negative consequences. It can be assessed using a self-reported instrument. Aim: To validate a Spanish self-reporting tool called Survey of High School Bullying Abuse of Power (MIAP). Material and Methods: The instrument has 13 questions, of which 7 are multiple choice, rende-ring a total of 49 items. It was applied to 2.341 children of seventh and eighth grade attending private, subsidized and municipal schools in the city of Concepción, Chile. Expert judge analysis and estimated reliability using the Cronbach Alpha were used to validate the survey. Results: The instrument obtained a Cronbach Alpha coeffcient of 0.8892, classifed as good. This analysis generated four scales that explained 30.9% of the variance. They were called Witness Bullying with 18 items, accounting for 11.4% of the variance, Bullying Victim with 12 items, accounting for 7.5% of the variance, Bullying Perpetrator and Severe bullying Victim, with 10 items explaining 6.4% of the variance and Aggressor Bullying with 6 items accounting for 5.7% of the variance. Conclusions: The MIAP can recognize four basic factors that facilitate the analysis and understanding of bullying, with good levels of reliability and validity. The remaining questions also deliver valuable information. |
| author |
Lecannelier,Felipe Varela,Jorge Rodríguez,Jorge Hoffmann,Marianela Flores,Fernanda Ascanio,Lorena |
| author_facet |
Lecannelier,Felipe Varela,Jorge Rodríguez,Jorge Hoffmann,Marianela Flores,Fernanda Ascanio,Lorena |
| author_sort |
Lecannelier,Felipe |
| title |
Validación del Cuestionario de Maltrato entre Iguales por Abuso de Poder (MIAP) para escolares |
| title_short |
Validación del Cuestionario de Maltrato entre Iguales por Abuso de Poder (MIAP) para escolares |
| title_full |
Validación del Cuestionario de Maltrato entre Iguales por Abuso de Poder (MIAP) para escolares |
| title_fullStr |
Validación del Cuestionario de Maltrato entre Iguales por Abuso de Poder (MIAP) para escolares |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Validación del Cuestionario de Maltrato entre Iguales por Abuso de Poder (MIAP) para escolares |
| title_sort |
validación del cuestionario de maltrato entre iguales por abuso de poder (miap) para escolares |
| publisher |
Sociedad Médica de Santiago |
| publishDate |
2011 |
| url |
http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872011000400009 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT lecannelierfelipe validaciondelcuestionariodemaltratoentreigualesporabusodepodermiapparaescolares AT varelajorge validaciondelcuestionariodemaltratoentreigualesporabusodepodermiapparaescolares AT rodriguezjorge validaciondelcuestionariodemaltratoentreigualesporabusodepodermiapparaescolares AT hoffmannmarianela validaciondelcuestionariodemaltratoentreigualesporabusodepodermiapparaescolares AT floresfernanda validaciondelcuestionariodemaltratoentreigualesporabusodepodermiapparaescolares AT ascaniolorena validaciondelcuestionariodemaltratoentreigualesporabusodepodermiapparaescolares |
| _version_ |
1718436561538777088 |