Bioética de la muerte de Sigmund Freud: ¿Eutanasia o apropiación?

The death of Freud raises the ethical dilemma about euthanasia. It can be characterized as indirect active euthanasia according to the rule of double effect, or terminal sedation, or palliated death. The primacy of the principle of autonomy over non maleficence, conditioned the physician’s attitude...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Figueroa,Gustavo
Lenguaje:Spanish / Castilian
Publicado: Sociedad Médica de Santiago 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872011000400017
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:scielo:S0034-98872011000400017
record_format dspace
spelling oai:scielo:S0034-988720110004000172011-08-25Bioética de la muerte de Sigmund Freud: ¿Eutanasia o apropiación?Figueroa,Gustavo Biography Conscious sedation Ethics Euthanasia The death of Freud raises the ethical dilemma about euthanasia. It can be characterized as indirect active euthanasia according to the rule of double effect, or terminal sedation, or palliated death. The primacy of the principle of autonomy over non maleficence, conditioned the physician’s attitude toward his patient Freud. The physician assisted death was and remains punishable in western medicine. Therefore, a fundamental tradition was infringed. In contrast, the present study attempts to characterize the final position of Freud himself to his death and called it appropriation of his finitude; he assumes his being-unto-death, that is, he now projects his being not as a being-at-his-end but as a being-unto-end, indicating thereby that he understood that the end always penetrated his whole existence.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedad Médica de SantiagoRevista médica de Chile v.139 n.4 20112011-04-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872011000400017es10.4067/S0034-98872011000400017
institution Scielo Chile
collection Scielo Chile
language Spanish / Castilian
topic Biography
Conscious sedation
Ethics
Euthanasia
spellingShingle Biography
Conscious sedation
Ethics
Euthanasia
Figueroa,Gustavo
Bioética de la muerte de Sigmund Freud: ¿Eutanasia o apropiación?
description The death of Freud raises the ethical dilemma about euthanasia. It can be characterized as indirect active euthanasia according to the rule of double effect, or terminal sedation, or palliated death. The primacy of the principle of autonomy over non maleficence, conditioned the physician’s attitude toward his patient Freud. The physician assisted death was and remains punishable in western medicine. Therefore, a fundamental tradition was infringed. In contrast, the present study attempts to characterize the final position of Freud himself to his death and called it appropriation of his finitude; he assumes his being-unto-death, that is, he now projects his being not as a being-at-his-end but as a being-unto-end, indicating thereby that he understood that the end always penetrated his whole existence.
author Figueroa,Gustavo
author_facet Figueroa,Gustavo
author_sort Figueroa,Gustavo
title Bioética de la muerte de Sigmund Freud: ¿Eutanasia o apropiación?
title_short Bioética de la muerte de Sigmund Freud: ¿Eutanasia o apropiación?
title_full Bioética de la muerte de Sigmund Freud: ¿Eutanasia o apropiación?
title_fullStr Bioética de la muerte de Sigmund Freud: ¿Eutanasia o apropiación?
title_full_unstemmed Bioética de la muerte de Sigmund Freud: ¿Eutanasia o apropiación?
title_sort bioética de la muerte de sigmund freud: ¿eutanasia o apropiación?
publisher Sociedad Médica de Santiago
publishDate 2011
url http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872011000400017
work_keys_str_mv AT figueroagustavo bioeticadelamuertedesigmundfreudeutanasiaoapropiacion
_version_ 1718436563159875584