Diferencia veno-arterial de dióxido de carbono como predictor de gasto cardiaco disminuido en modelo pediátrico experimental

Diferencia veno-arterial de dióxido de carbono como predictor de gasto cardiaco disminuido en modelo pediátrico experimental

Background: Cardiac output (CO) measurement is not a standard of care for critically ill children, but it can be estimated by indirect methods such as veno-arterial pCO2 difference (ΔVACO2). Aim: To determine the correlation between CO and ΔVACO2 and evaluate the usefulness of &...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Díaz,Franco, Donoso,Alejandro, Carvajal,Cristóbal, Salomón,Tatiana, Torres,María, Erranz,Benjamín, Cruces,Pablo
Lenguaje:Spanish / Castilian
Publicado: Sociedad Médica de Santiago 2012
Materias:
Blood gas monitoring
Carbon Dioxide
Critical Care
Hemodynamics
Cardiac Output
Acceso en línea:http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872012000100005
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Descripción
Sumario:Background: Cardiac output (CO) measurement is not a standard of care for critically ill children, but it can be estimated by indirect methods such as veno-arterial pCO2 difference (&#916;VACO2). Aim: To determine the correlation between CO and &#916;VACO2 and evaluate the usefulness of &#916;VACO2 in the diagnosis of low CO in an experimental pediatric model. Materials and Methods: Thirty piglets weighing 4.8 ± 0.35 kg were anesthetized and monitored with transpulmonary thermodilution. Lung injury was induced with tracheal instillation of Tween 20®. Serial measurements of central venous and arterial blood gases, as well as CO, were obtained at baseline, 1, 2 and 4 h after lung injury induction. Low cardiac output (LCO) was defined as CO lower than 2.5 Llminlm². Results: There was an inverse correlation between CO and &#916;VACO2 (r = -0.36, p < 0.01). &#916;VACO2 was 14 ± 8 mmHg in LCO state and 8 ± 6 mmHg when this condition was not present (p < 0.01). Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of &#916;VACO2 and LCO state was 0.78 (0.68-0.86). The best cut-point was 8.9 mmHg to determine LCO with a sensibility 0.78, specificity 0.7, positive predictive value 0.27 and negative predictive value 0.96. Conclusions: In this model there was an inverse correlation between &#916;VACO2 and CO. The best cutoff value to discard LCO was &#916;VACO2 of 8.9 mmHg, indicating that under this value the presence of LCO is very unlikely.

Ejemplares similares