Uso versus no uso de malla en hernioplastía inguinal: ¿existe un rol para la reparación sin malla? Revisión global de la evidencia

There is controversy about the effectiveness of mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair (IHR) when compared with non-mesh procedures. The aim of this study was to systematically review the available evidence on the effectiveness of mesh compared to non-mesh IHR techniques. Cochrane Central and ME...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Manterola,Carlos, Urrutia,Sebastián, Otzen,Támara
Lenguaje:	Spanish / Castilian
Publicado:	Sociedad Médica de Santiago 2013
Materias:	Evidence-Based Medicine Hernia Inguinal Herniorrhaphy Surgical Mesh
Acceso en línea:	http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872013000700015
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:scielo:S0034-98872013000700015
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:scielo:S0034-988720130007000152013-12-17Uso versus no uso de malla en hernioplastía inguinal: ¿existe un rol para la reparación sin malla? Revisión global de la evidenciaManterola,CarlosUrrutia,SebastiánOtzen,Támara Evidence-Based Medicine Hernia Inguinal Herniorrhaphy Surgical Mesh There is controversy about the effectiveness of mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair (IHR) when compared with non-mesh procedures. The aim of this study was to systematically review the available evidence on the effectiveness of mesh compared to non-mesh IHR techniques. Cochrane Central and MEDLINE databases and the TRIP Database engine were reviewed looking for systematic reviews (SR) and clinical trials (CT) published from 1990 to 2012, comparing the effectiveness, in terms of operative time, postoperative pain, morbidity, hospital stay, return to work, costs and recurrence, of mesh and non-mesh IHR techniques. We retrieved 3,069 articles, 17 of which met the selection criteria (3 SR and 14 RCT), representing a population of 15,124 subjects (7361 mesh and 7763 non-mesh IHR). According to these studies, mesh IHR techniques are associated with less surgical time, pain, hospital stay, recurrence and sooner return to work than non-mesh techniques. It is concluded that mesh techniques are more effective than those not using a mesh.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedad Médica de SantiagoRevista médica de Chile v.141 n.7 20132013-07-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872013000700015es10.4067/S0034-98872013000700015
institution	Scielo Chile
collection	Scielo Chile
language	Spanish / Castilian
topic	Evidence-Based Medicine Hernia Inguinal Herniorrhaphy Surgical Mesh
spellingShingle	Evidence-Based Medicine Hernia Inguinal Herniorrhaphy Surgical Mesh Manterola,Carlos Urrutia,Sebastián Otzen,Támara Uso versus no uso de malla en hernioplastía inguinal: ¿existe un rol para la reparación sin malla? Revisión global de la evidencia
description	There is controversy about the effectiveness of mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair (IHR) when compared with non-mesh procedures. The aim of this study was to systematically review the available evidence on the effectiveness of mesh compared to non-mesh IHR techniques. Cochrane Central and MEDLINE databases and the TRIP Database engine were reviewed looking for systematic reviews (SR) and clinical trials (CT) published from 1990 to 2012, comparing the effectiveness, in terms of operative time, postoperative pain, morbidity, hospital stay, return to work, costs and recurrence, of mesh and non-mesh IHR techniques. We retrieved 3,069 articles, 17 of which met the selection criteria (3 SR and 14 RCT), representing a population of 15,124 subjects (7361 mesh and 7763 non-mesh IHR). According to these studies, mesh IHR techniques are associated with less surgical time, pain, hospital stay, recurrence and sooner return to work than non-mesh techniques. It is concluded that mesh techniques are more effective than those not using a mesh.
author	Manterola,Carlos Urrutia,Sebastián Otzen,Támara
author_facet	Manterola,Carlos Urrutia,Sebastián Otzen,Támara
author_sort	Manterola,Carlos
title	Uso versus no uso de malla en hernioplastía inguinal: ¿existe un rol para la reparación sin malla? Revisión global de la evidencia
title_short	Uso versus no uso de malla en hernioplastía inguinal: ¿existe un rol para la reparación sin malla? Revisión global de la evidencia
title_full	Uso versus no uso de malla en hernioplastía inguinal: ¿existe un rol para la reparación sin malla? Revisión global de la evidencia
title_fullStr	Uso versus no uso de malla en hernioplastía inguinal: ¿existe un rol para la reparación sin malla? Revisión global de la evidencia
title_full_unstemmed	Uso versus no uso de malla en hernioplastía inguinal: ¿existe un rol para la reparación sin malla? Revisión global de la evidencia
title_sort	uso versus no uso de malla en hernioplastía inguinal: ¿existe un rol para la reparación sin malla? revisión global de la evidencia
publisher	Sociedad Médica de Santiago
publishDate	2013
url	http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872013000700015
work_keys_str_mv	AT manterolacarlos usoversusnousodemallaenhernioplastiainguinalexisteunrolparalareparacionsinmallarevisionglobaldelaevidencia AT urrutiasebastian usoversusnousodemallaenhernioplastiainguinalexisteunrolparalareparacionsinmallarevisionglobaldelaevidencia AT otzentamara usoversusnousodemallaenhernioplastiainguinalexisteunrolparalareparacionsinmallarevisionglobaldelaevidencia
_version_	1718436701881237504

Uso versus no uso de malla en hernioplastía inguinal: ¿existe un rol para la reparación sin malla? Revisión global de la evidencia

Ejemplares similares