Resultados a 10 años en trasplantes renales con donantes vivos no relacionados: Experiencia de 22 años

Background: There is a gap between the number of patients requiring a renal allograft and the number of potential deceased donors (DD). One alternative is using allografts from non-related living donors (NRLD). Aim: To compare survival and complications of renal allograft recipients from DD, related...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Carmona R,Carolina, Huidobro E,Juan Pablo, Vega S,Jorge
Lenguaje:	Spanish / Castilian
Publicado:	Sociedad Médica de Santiago 2015
Materias:	Graft survival Kidney transplantation Living donors Prognosis Unrelated donors
Acceso en línea:	http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872015000200001
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:scielo:S0034-98872015000200001
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:scielo:S0034-988720150002000012015-04-09Resultados a 10 años en trasplantes renales con donantes vivos no relacionados: Experiencia de 22 añosCarmona R,CarolinaHuidobro E,Juan PabloVega S,Jorge Graft survival Kidney transplantation Living donors Prognosis Unrelated donors Background: There is a gap between the number of patients requiring a renal allograft and the number of potential deceased donors (DD). One alternative is using allografts from non-related living donors (NRLD). Aim: To compare survival and complications of renal allograft recipients from DD, related living donors (RLD) and NRLD. Material and Methods: Observational study of a cohort of renal allograft recipients. Of 253 transplants performed in a Chilean region between 1981 and 2003, 20 patients received and allograft from a NRLD. Graft and patient survival of these patients were compared with those of 93 patients receiving an allograft from a related living donor and 140 receiving it from a DD. Patients were followed for 10 years or until death or dialysis requirement. Results: No significant differences between groups in graft and patient survival, deaths with a functioning graft or return to dialysis were observed. Receptors of DD had more hospital admissions during the first years after receiving the graft, usually due to infections. Also a delayed graft function was more common among them. Glomerular filtration rate ten years after the graft was similar among the three groups. Conclusions: No differences in graft or patient survival was observed between patients receiving a renal allograft from NRLD, RLD or DD.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedad Médica de SantiagoRevista médica de Chile v.143 n.2 20152015-02-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872015000200001es10.4067/S0034-98872015000200001
institution	Scielo Chile
collection	Scielo Chile
language	Spanish / Castilian
topic	Graft survival Kidney transplantation Living donors Prognosis Unrelated donors
spellingShingle	Graft survival Kidney transplantation Living donors Prognosis Unrelated donors Carmona R,Carolina Huidobro E,Juan Pablo Vega S,Jorge Resultados a 10 años en trasplantes renales con donantes vivos no relacionados: Experiencia de 22 años
description	Background: There is a gap between the number of patients requiring a renal allograft and the number of potential deceased donors (DD). One alternative is using allografts from non-related living donors (NRLD). Aim: To compare survival and complications of renal allograft recipients from DD, related living donors (RLD) and NRLD. Material and Methods: Observational study of a cohort of renal allograft recipients. Of 253 transplants performed in a Chilean region between 1981 and 2003, 20 patients received and allograft from a NRLD. Graft and patient survival of these patients were compared with those of 93 patients receiving an allograft from a related living donor and 140 receiving it from a DD. Patients were followed for 10 years or until death or dialysis requirement. Results: No significant differences between groups in graft and patient survival, deaths with a functioning graft or return to dialysis were observed. Receptors of DD had more hospital admissions during the first years after receiving the graft, usually due to infections. Also a delayed graft function was more common among them. Glomerular filtration rate ten years after the graft was similar among the three groups. Conclusions: No differences in graft or patient survival was observed between patients receiving a renal allograft from NRLD, RLD or DD.
author	Carmona R,Carolina Huidobro E,Juan Pablo Vega S,Jorge
author_facet	Carmona R,Carolina Huidobro E,Juan Pablo Vega S,Jorge
author_sort	Carmona R,Carolina
title	Resultados a 10 años en trasplantes renales con donantes vivos no relacionados: Experiencia de 22 años
title_short	Resultados a 10 años en trasplantes renales con donantes vivos no relacionados: Experiencia de 22 años
title_full	Resultados a 10 años en trasplantes renales con donantes vivos no relacionados: Experiencia de 22 años
title_fullStr	Resultados a 10 años en trasplantes renales con donantes vivos no relacionados: Experiencia de 22 años
title_full_unstemmed	Resultados a 10 años en trasplantes renales con donantes vivos no relacionados: Experiencia de 22 años
title_sort	resultados a 10 años en trasplantes renales con donantes vivos no relacionados: experiencia de 22 años
publisher	Sociedad Médica de Santiago
publishDate	2015
url	http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872015000200001
work_keys_str_mv	AT carmonarcarolina resultadosa10anosentrasplantesrenalescondonantesvivosnorelacionadosexperienciade22anos AT huidobroejuanpablo resultadosa10anosentrasplantesrenalescondonantesvivosnorelacionadosexperienciade22anos AT vegasjorge resultadosa10anosentrasplantesrenalescondonantesvivosnorelacionadosexperienciade22anos
_version_	1718436802928312320

Resultados a 10 años en trasplantes renales con donantes vivos no relacionados: Experiencia de 22 años

Ejemplares similares