Percepción de examen oral estandarizado vs no estandarizado en el internado de medicina interna

Background: Oral examinations are a useful tool to appraise certain medical skills compared to other examinations. However, they have some disadvantages that might be reduced with standardization. Aim: To compare students’ perception comparing a standardized oral exam (SOE) versus a tradit...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pérez H,Iván, Vergara R,Claudia, Goens G,Cristina, Viviani G,Paola, Letelier S,Luz M
Lenguaje:Spanish / Castilian
Publicado: Sociedad Médica de Santiago 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872015000700003
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:scielo:S0034-98872015000700003
record_format dspace
spelling oai:scielo:S0034-988720150007000032015-09-03Percepción de examen oral estandarizado vs no estandarizado en el internado de medicina internaPérez H,IvánVergara R,ClaudiaGoens G,CristinaViviani G,PaolaLetelier S,Luz M Cross-Sectional Studies Educational Measurement Education, Medical Background: Oral examinations are a useful tool to appraise certain medical skills compared to other examinations. However, they have some disadvantages that might be reduced with standardization. Aim: To compare students&#8217; perception comparing a standardized oral exam (SOE) versus a traditional, non-standardized oral exam (NSOE). Material and Methods: During the first semester of 2013 a NSOE was applied to internal medicine undergraduate students. During the second semester, a SOE was applied. An anonymous and voluntary perception questionnaire, consisting in 10 questions based on a 5-level Likert scale, was answered by these students. Statistical analysis was done using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: Among the 118 students, 50.8% were evaluated using NSOE and 49.2% using SOE. Questionnaire response rate was 84%. Among respondents, 52% took the SOE and 48%, the NSOE. Students evaluated using SOE perceived that the degree of complexity of clinical cases was similar for all examinees (p < 0.05), that exam duration was standardized (p < 0.05), and that grades obtained were less influenced by the clinical site where the exam was taken (p < 0.05). However, anxiety level remained high in both groups, as well as the overall satisfaction experience. Conclusions: Standardization of an oral examination improves the perception of medical students about levels of difficulty, duration and external influences on the final grade.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedad Médica de SantiagoRevista médica de Chile v.143 n.7 20152015-07-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872015000700003es10.4067/S0034-98872015000700003
institution Scielo Chile
collection Scielo Chile
language Spanish / Castilian
topic Cross-Sectional Studies
Educational Measurement
Education, Medical
spellingShingle Cross-Sectional Studies
Educational Measurement
Education, Medical
Pérez H,Iván
Vergara R,Claudia
Goens G,Cristina
Viviani G,Paola
Letelier S,Luz M
Percepción de examen oral estandarizado vs no estandarizado en el internado de medicina interna
description Background: Oral examinations are a useful tool to appraise certain medical skills compared to other examinations. However, they have some disadvantages that might be reduced with standardization. Aim: To compare students&#8217; perception comparing a standardized oral exam (SOE) versus a traditional, non-standardized oral exam (NSOE). Material and Methods: During the first semester of 2013 a NSOE was applied to internal medicine undergraduate students. During the second semester, a SOE was applied. An anonymous and voluntary perception questionnaire, consisting in 10 questions based on a 5-level Likert scale, was answered by these students. Statistical analysis was done using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: Among the 118 students, 50.8% were evaluated using NSOE and 49.2% using SOE. Questionnaire response rate was 84%. Among respondents, 52% took the SOE and 48%, the NSOE. Students evaluated using SOE perceived that the degree of complexity of clinical cases was similar for all examinees (p < 0.05), that exam duration was standardized (p < 0.05), and that grades obtained were less influenced by the clinical site where the exam was taken (p < 0.05). However, anxiety level remained high in both groups, as well as the overall satisfaction experience. Conclusions: Standardization of an oral examination improves the perception of medical students about levels of difficulty, duration and external influences on the final grade.
author Pérez H,Iván
Vergara R,Claudia
Goens G,Cristina
Viviani G,Paola
Letelier S,Luz M
author_facet Pérez H,Iván
Vergara R,Claudia
Goens G,Cristina
Viviani G,Paola
Letelier S,Luz M
author_sort Pérez H,Iván
title Percepción de examen oral estandarizado vs no estandarizado en el internado de medicina interna
title_short Percepción de examen oral estandarizado vs no estandarizado en el internado de medicina interna
title_full Percepción de examen oral estandarizado vs no estandarizado en el internado de medicina interna
title_fullStr Percepción de examen oral estandarizado vs no estandarizado en el internado de medicina interna
title_full_unstemmed Percepción de examen oral estandarizado vs no estandarizado en el internado de medicina interna
title_sort percepción de examen oral estandarizado vs no estandarizado en el internado de medicina interna
publisher Sociedad Médica de Santiago
publishDate 2015
url http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872015000700003
work_keys_str_mv AT perezhivan percepciondeexamenoralestandarizadovsnoestandarizadoenelinternadodemedicinainterna
AT vergararclaudia percepciondeexamenoralestandarizadovsnoestandarizadoenelinternadodemedicinainterna
AT goensgcristina percepciondeexamenoralestandarizadovsnoestandarizadoenelinternadodemedicinainterna
AT vivianigpaola percepciondeexamenoralestandarizadovsnoestandarizadoenelinternadodemedicinainterna
AT leteliersluzm percepciondeexamenoralestandarizadovsnoestandarizadoenelinternadodemedicinainterna
_version_ 1718436829844209664