Tipologías y argumentos en torno a las técnicas de reproducción asistida en habitantes de Santiago de Chile
Background: Assisted reproductive technologies still generate debate about ethical moral and religious issues. Aim: To analyze the opinions of the general public about the use of assisted reproduction technology (ART). Material and Methods: This analysis used the information gathered in a survey abo...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Lenguaje: | Spanish / Castilian |
| Publicado: |
Sociedad Médica de Santiago
2015
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872015001200004 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:scielo:S0034-98872015001200004 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:scielo:S0034-988720150012000042016-02-29Tipologías y argumentos en torno a las técnicas de reproducción asistida en habitantes de Santiago de ChileHerrera,FlorenciaTeitelboim,BertaZegers-Hochschild,Fernando Fertilization Health surveys Infertility Background: Assisted reproductive technologies still generate debate about ethical moral and religious issues. Aim: To analyze the opinions of the general public about the use of assisted reproduction technology (ART). Material and Methods: This analysis used the information gathered in a survey about human reproduction and modern reproduction technologies applied to a random sample of 1,500 volunteers aged 18 to 65 years, living in Santiago, Chile. Also, data from 25 structured interviews and six focal groups of eight participants each was used. To typify opinions concerning the use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART), a multiple correspondence analysis was undertaken. Results: People that support ART are non-religious young people of medium-high socioeconomic level. The arguments most commonly used by people to justify their positions about ART are the right to have children, the protection of kinship, that ART implies commercialization and manipulation of human life, the need to obey Gods will, and the autonomy of informed and educated adults. Conclusions: The study allows us to understand in more complex ways the positions about ART. Chile does not have a legislation that regulates the use of ART. Generating information on the public opinion about these techniques we hope to contribute to the debate about the access and regulation of new reproductive technologies in Chile.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedad Médica de SantiagoRevista médica de Chile v.143 n.12 20152015-12-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872015001200004es10.4067/S0034-98872015001200004 |
| institution |
Scielo Chile |
| collection |
Scielo Chile |
| language |
Spanish / Castilian |
| topic |
Fertilization Health surveys Infertility |
| spellingShingle |
Fertilization Health surveys Infertility Herrera,Florencia Teitelboim,Berta Zegers-Hochschild,Fernando Tipologías y argumentos en torno a las técnicas de reproducción asistida en habitantes de Santiago de Chile |
| description |
Background: Assisted reproductive technologies still generate debate about ethical moral and religious issues. Aim: To analyze the opinions of the general public about the use of assisted reproduction technology (ART). Material and Methods: This analysis used the information gathered in a survey about human reproduction and modern reproduction technologies applied to a random sample of 1,500 volunteers aged 18 to 65 years, living in Santiago, Chile. Also, data from 25 structured interviews and six focal groups of eight participants each was used. To typify opinions concerning the use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART), a multiple correspondence analysis was undertaken. Results: People that support ART are non-religious young people of medium-high socioeconomic level. The arguments most commonly used by people to justify their positions about ART are the right to have children, the protection of kinship, that ART implies commercialization and manipulation of human life, the need to obey Gods will, and the autonomy of informed and educated adults. Conclusions: The study allows us to understand in more complex ways the positions about ART. Chile does not have a legislation that regulates the use of ART. Generating information on the public opinion about these techniques we hope to contribute to the debate about the access and regulation of new reproductive technologies in Chile. |
| author |
Herrera,Florencia Teitelboim,Berta Zegers-Hochschild,Fernando |
| author_facet |
Herrera,Florencia Teitelboim,Berta Zegers-Hochschild,Fernando |
| author_sort |
Herrera,Florencia |
| title |
Tipologías y argumentos en torno a las técnicas de reproducción asistida en habitantes de Santiago de Chile |
| title_short |
Tipologías y argumentos en torno a las técnicas de reproducción asistida en habitantes de Santiago de Chile |
| title_full |
Tipologías y argumentos en torno a las técnicas de reproducción asistida en habitantes de Santiago de Chile |
| title_fullStr |
Tipologías y argumentos en torno a las técnicas de reproducción asistida en habitantes de Santiago de Chile |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Tipologías y argumentos en torno a las técnicas de reproducción asistida en habitantes de Santiago de Chile |
| title_sort |
tipologías y argumentos en torno a las técnicas de reproducción asistida en habitantes de santiago de chile |
| publisher |
Sociedad Médica de Santiago |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| url |
http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872015001200004 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT herreraflorencia tipologiasyargumentosentornoalastecnicasdereproduccionasistidaenhabitantesdesantiagodechile AT teitelboimberta tipologiasyargumentosentornoalastecnicasdereproduccionasistidaenhabitantesdesantiagodechile AT zegershochschildfernando tipologiasyargumentosentornoalastecnicasdereproduccionasistidaenhabitantesdesantiagodechile |
| _version_ |
1718436855605624832 |