Evaluación de calidad de las guías de práctica clínica de los 80 problemas de salud del régimen de garantías explícitas en salud

Background: High quality practice guidelines are of utmost importance in clinical medicine. Aim: To evaluate the methodological quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) for 80 high burden health conditions included in the Explicit Guarantees in Healthcare (EGH) program available on July 2014,...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Rodríguez,María Francisca, Pineda,Ignacio, Rozas,María Fernanda
Lenguaje:	Spanish / Castilian
Publicado:	Sociedad Médica de Santiago 2016
Materias:	Health Care Reform Practice Guidelines Quality Control Quality of Health Care
Acceso en línea:	http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872016000700006
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:scielo:S0034-98872016000700006
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:scielo:S0034-988720160007000062016-10-03Evaluación de calidad de las guías de práctica clínica de los 80 problemas de salud del régimen de garantías explícitas en saludRodríguez,María FranciscaPineda,IgnacioRozas,María Fernanda Health Care Reform Practice Guidelines Quality Control Quality of Health Care Background: High quality practice guidelines are of utmost importance in clinical medicine. Aim: To evaluate the methodological quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) for 80 high burden health conditions included in the Explicit Guarantees in Healthcare (EGH) program available on July 2014, elaborated and published by the Ministry of Health of Chile. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional observational study using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument to evaluate the methodological quality of the current CPGs for EGH. Two reviewers assessed each CPG independently, obtaining standardized scores according for each dimension included in the AGREE II instrument. Results: Eighty one CPGs were evaluated. They were generally considered of reasonable quality, obtaining high scores in the following domains: Scope and Purpose (81.3%), Clarity of Presentation (78.6%) and Editorial Independence (76.5%). The following domains had a score under 60%: Stakeholder Involvement (51.3%), Rigor of Development (41.4%) and Applicability (33.6%). Conclusions: The CPGs elaborated for the EGH program have high scores in domains such as the Scope and Purpose, Clarity of Presentation and Editorial Independence. Their scores in other dimensions such as Stakeholder Involvement, Rigor of Development and Applicability can be still improved.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedad Médica de SantiagoRevista médica de Chile v.144 n.7 20162016-07-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872016000700006es10.4067/S0034-98872016000700006
institution	Scielo Chile
collection	Scielo Chile
language	Spanish / Castilian
topic	Health Care Reform Practice Guidelines Quality Control Quality of Health Care
spellingShingle	Health Care Reform Practice Guidelines Quality Control Quality of Health Care Rodríguez,María Francisca Pineda,Ignacio Rozas,María Fernanda Evaluación de calidad de las guías de práctica clínica de los 80 problemas de salud del régimen de garantías explícitas en salud
description	Background: High quality practice guidelines are of utmost importance in clinical medicine. Aim: To evaluate the methodological quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) for 80 high burden health conditions included in the Explicit Guarantees in Healthcare (EGH) program available on July 2014, elaborated and published by the Ministry of Health of Chile. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional observational study using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument to evaluate the methodological quality of the current CPGs for EGH. Two reviewers assessed each CPG independently, obtaining standardized scores according for each dimension included in the AGREE II instrument. Results: Eighty one CPGs were evaluated. They were generally considered of reasonable quality, obtaining high scores in the following domains: Scope and Purpose (81.3%), Clarity of Presentation (78.6%) and Editorial Independence (76.5%). The following domains had a score under 60%: Stakeholder Involvement (51.3%), Rigor of Development (41.4%) and Applicability (33.6%). Conclusions: The CPGs elaborated for the EGH program have high scores in domains such as the Scope and Purpose, Clarity of Presentation and Editorial Independence. Their scores in other dimensions such as Stakeholder Involvement, Rigor of Development and Applicability can be still improved.
author	Rodríguez,María Francisca Pineda,Ignacio Rozas,María Fernanda
author_facet	Rodríguez,María Francisca Pineda,Ignacio Rozas,María Fernanda
author_sort	Rodríguez,María Francisca
title	Evaluación de calidad de las guías de práctica clínica de los 80 problemas de salud del régimen de garantías explícitas en salud
title_short	Evaluación de calidad de las guías de práctica clínica de los 80 problemas de salud del régimen de garantías explícitas en salud
title_full	Evaluación de calidad de las guías de práctica clínica de los 80 problemas de salud del régimen de garantías explícitas en salud
title_fullStr	Evaluación de calidad de las guías de práctica clínica de los 80 problemas de salud del régimen de garantías explícitas en salud
title_full_unstemmed	Evaluación de calidad de las guías de práctica clínica de los 80 problemas de salud del régimen de garantías explícitas en salud
title_sort	evaluación de calidad de las guías de práctica clínica de los 80 problemas de salud del régimen de garantías explícitas en salud
publisher	Sociedad Médica de Santiago
publishDate	2016
url	http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872016000700006
work_keys_str_mv	AT rodriguezmariafrancisca evaluaciondecalidaddelasguiasdepracticaclinicadelos80problemasdesaluddelregimendegarantiasexplicitasensalud AT pinedaignacio evaluaciondecalidaddelasguiasdepracticaclinicadelos80problemasdesaluddelregimendegarantiasexplicitasensalud AT rozasmariafernanda evaluaciondecalidaddelasguiasdepracticaclinicadelos80problemasdesaluddelregimendegarantiasexplicitasensalud
_version_	1718436893547298816

Evaluación de calidad de las guías de práctica clínica de los 80 problemas de salud del régimen de garantías explícitas en salud

Ejemplares similares