Cómo interpretar guías de práctica clínica elaboradas con metodología GRADE
The Ministry of Health of Chile, aiming to improve the quality of clinical practice guidelines, gradually incorporated the GRADE system (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) to develop evidence based recommendations. This system summarizes and evaluates the certainty o...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | Spanish / Castilian |
Publicado: |
Sociedad Médica de Santiago
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872017001101463 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:scielo:S0034-98872017001101463 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:scielo:S0034-988720170011014632018-04-06Cómo interpretar guías de práctica clínica elaboradas con metodología GRADEMendoza,CarolinaKraemer,PatriciaHerrera,PalomaBurdiles,PamelaSepúlveda,DinoNúñez,EliozkaMuñoz,CeciliaNeumann,Ignacio Chile Evidence-Based Practice Practice Guidelines as Topic The Ministry of Health of Chile, aiming to improve the quality of clinical practice guidelines, gradually incorporated the GRADE system (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) to develop evidence based recommendations. This system summarizes and evaluates the certainty of the available evidence. It moves from evidence to decision in a systematic and transparent manner, based on four main dimensions: balance between benefits and harms, certainty of evidence, patient’s values and preferences and use of resources. The GRADE system produces strong and conditional recommendations. Strong recommendations provide confidence that the favorable consequences of an intervention clearly outweigh the adverse consequences, or vice versa. These recommendations apply to a broad range of patients and circumstances. Conditional recommendations, however, indicate that there is a close balance between favorable and unfavorable consequences of the intervention, there is uncertainty in the magnitude of benefits or adverse effects, there is uncertainty or variability in values and preferences of individuals or costs are not justified. These recommendations apply to many patients, but not all of them: ideally they should be discussed with each person. To achieve a better implementation of the recommendations made with GRADE methodology, health professionals should know the meaning of strong and conditional recommendations and they should be able to critically assess of them.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedad Médica de SantiagoRevista médica de Chile v.145 n.11 20172017-11-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872017001101463es10.4067/s0034-98872017001101463 |
institution |
Scielo Chile |
collection |
Scielo Chile |
language |
Spanish / Castilian |
topic |
Chile Evidence-Based Practice Practice Guidelines as Topic |
spellingShingle |
Chile Evidence-Based Practice Practice Guidelines as Topic Mendoza,Carolina Kraemer,Patricia Herrera,Paloma Burdiles,Pamela Sepúlveda,Dino Núñez,Eliozka Muñoz,Cecilia Neumann,Ignacio Cómo interpretar guías de práctica clínica elaboradas con metodología GRADE |
description |
The Ministry of Health of Chile, aiming to improve the quality of clinical practice guidelines, gradually incorporated the GRADE system (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) to develop evidence based recommendations. This system summarizes and evaluates the certainty of the available evidence. It moves from evidence to decision in a systematic and transparent manner, based on four main dimensions: balance between benefits and harms, certainty of evidence, patient’s values and preferences and use of resources. The GRADE system produces strong and conditional recommendations. Strong recommendations provide confidence that the favorable consequences of an intervention clearly outweigh the adverse consequences, or vice versa. These recommendations apply to a broad range of patients and circumstances. Conditional recommendations, however, indicate that there is a close balance between favorable and unfavorable consequences of the intervention, there is uncertainty in the magnitude of benefits or adverse effects, there is uncertainty or variability in values and preferences of individuals or costs are not justified. These recommendations apply to many patients, but not all of them: ideally they should be discussed with each person. To achieve a better implementation of the recommendations made with GRADE methodology, health professionals should know the meaning of strong and conditional recommendations and they should be able to critically assess of them. |
author |
Mendoza,Carolina Kraemer,Patricia Herrera,Paloma Burdiles,Pamela Sepúlveda,Dino Núñez,Eliozka Muñoz,Cecilia Neumann,Ignacio |
author_facet |
Mendoza,Carolina Kraemer,Patricia Herrera,Paloma Burdiles,Pamela Sepúlveda,Dino Núñez,Eliozka Muñoz,Cecilia Neumann,Ignacio |
author_sort |
Mendoza,Carolina |
title |
Cómo interpretar guías de práctica clínica elaboradas con metodología GRADE |
title_short |
Cómo interpretar guías de práctica clínica elaboradas con metodología GRADE |
title_full |
Cómo interpretar guías de práctica clínica elaboradas con metodología GRADE |
title_fullStr |
Cómo interpretar guías de práctica clínica elaboradas con metodología GRADE |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cómo interpretar guías de práctica clínica elaboradas con metodología GRADE |
title_sort |
cómo interpretar guías de práctica clínica elaboradas con metodología grade |
publisher |
Sociedad Médica de Santiago |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872017001101463 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mendozacarolina comointerpretarguiasdepracticaclinicaelaboradasconmetodologiagrade AT kraemerpatricia comointerpretarguiasdepracticaclinicaelaboradasconmetodologiagrade AT herrerapaloma comointerpretarguiasdepracticaclinicaelaboradasconmetodologiagrade AT burdilespamela comointerpretarguiasdepracticaclinicaelaboradasconmetodologiagrade AT sepulvedadino comointerpretarguiasdepracticaclinicaelaboradasconmetodologiagrade AT nunezeliozka comointerpretarguiasdepracticaclinicaelaboradasconmetodologiagrade AT munozcecilia comointerpretarguiasdepracticaclinicaelaboradasconmetodologiagrade AT neumannignacio comointerpretarguiasdepracticaclinicaelaboradasconmetodologiagrade |
_version_ |
1718436977151311872 |