Como interpretar una revisión sistemática con comparaciones múltiples o network metaanálisis

Systematic reviews evaluating multiple interventions can be useful in different clinical situations. However, some concerns arise when more than two interventions are compared and there is a paucity of good quality randomized clinical trials. A novel statistical method based on indirect comparisons,...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Labarca,Gonzalo, Uribe,Juan P., Majid,Adnan, Folch,Erik, Fernandez-Bussy,Sebastián
Lenguaje:	Spanish / Castilian
Publicado:	Sociedad Médica de Santiago 2020
Materias:	Evidence-Based Medicine Meta-Analysis Methods Network Meta-Analysis
Acceso en línea:	http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872020000100109
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:scielo:S0034-98872020000100109
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:scielo:S0034-988720200001001092020-04-02Como interpretar una revisión sistemática con comparaciones múltiples o network metaanálisisLabarca,GonzaloUribe,Juan P.Majid,AdnanFolch,ErikFernandez-Bussy,Sebastián Evidence-Based Medicine Meta-Analysis Methods Network Meta-Analysis Systematic reviews evaluating multiple interventions can be useful in different clinical situations. However, some concerns arise when more than two interventions are compared and there is a paucity of good quality randomized clinical trials. A novel statistical method based on indirect comparisons, called network meta-analysis (NMA), can be a useful approach to find a clinical answer when multiple interventions are evaluated for the same outcome or comparator. The aim of this review is to describe the main characteristics and provide a user guide for a critical analysis of NMA focusing on its three main domains, namely homogeneity, transitivity and consistency.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedad Médica de SantiagoRevista médica de Chile v.148 n.1 20202020-01-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872020000100109es10.4067/S0034-98872020000100109
institution	Scielo Chile
collection	Scielo Chile
language	Spanish / Castilian
topic	Evidence-Based Medicine Meta-Analysis Methods Network Meta-Analysis
spellingShingle	Evidence-Based Medicine Meta-Analysis Methods Network Meta-Analysis Labarca,Gonzalo Uribe,Juan P. Majid,Adnan Folch,Erik Fernandez-Bussy,Sebastián Como interpretar una revisión sistemática con comparaciones múltiples o network metaanálisis
description	Systematic reviews evaluating multiple interventions can be useful in different clinical situations. However, some concerns arise when more than two interventions are compared and there is a paucity of good quality randomized clinical trials. A novel statistical method based on indirect comparisons, called network meta-analysis (NMA), can be a useful approach to find a clinical answer when multiple interventions are evaluated for the same outcome or comparator. The aim of this review is to describe the main characteristics and provide a user guide for a critical analysis of NMA focusing on its three main domains, namely homogeneity, transitivity and consistency.
author	Labarca,Gonzalo Uribe,Juan P. Majid,Adnan Folch,Erik Fernandez-Bussy,Sebastián
author_facet	Labarca,Gonzalo Uribe,Juan P. Majid,Adnan Folch,Erik Fernandez-Bussy,Sebastián
author_sort	Labarca,Gonzalo
title	Como interpretar una revisión sistemática con comparaciones múltiples o network metaanálisis
title_short	Como interpretar una revisión sistemática con comparaciones múltiples o network metaanálisis
title_full	Como interpretar una revisión sistemática con comparaciones múltiples o network metaanálisis
title_fullStr	Como interpretar una revisión sistemática con comparaciones múltiples o network metaanálisis
title_full_unstemmed	Como interpretar una revisión sistemática con comparaciones múltiples o network metaanálisis
title_sort	como interpretar una revisión sistemática con comparaciones múltiples o network metaanálisis
publisher	Sociedad Médica de Santiago
publishDate	2020
url	http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872020000100109
work_keys_str_mv	AT labarcagonzalo comointerpretarunarevisionsistematicaconcomparacionesmultiplesonetworkmetaanalisis AT uribejuanp comointerpretarunarevisionsistematicaconcomparacionesmultiplesonetworkmetaanalisis AT majidadnan comointerpretarunarevisionsistematicaconcomparacionesmultiplesonetworkmetaanalisis AT folcherik comointerpretarunarevisionsistematicaconcomparacionesmultiplesonetworkmetaanalisis AT fernandezbussysebastian comointerpretarunarevisionsistematicaconcomparacionesmultiplesonetworkmetaanalisis
_version_	1718437105861918720

Como interpretar una revisión sistemática con comparaciones múltiples o network metaanálisis

Ejemplares similares