Objeción de conciencia y acciones de salud

Conscientious Objection arises as a response to a regulation that is judged as immoral. Faced with a law that is considered unfair, the citizen can respond accepting it against his will, exercising conscientious objection on a personal level or, collectively reaching civil disobedience or revolution...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Echeverría B.,Carlos, Serani M.,Alejandro, Arriagada U.,Anamaría, Goic G.,Alejandro, Rojas O.,Alberto, Ruiz-Esquide,Gonzalo, Salinas R.,Rodrigo, Taboada R.,Paulina, Quintana V.,Carlos, Vacarezza Y.,Ricardo
Lenguaje:Spanish / Castilian
Publicado: Sociedad Médica de Santiago 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872020000200252
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:scielo:S0034-98872020000200252
record_format dspace
spelling oai:scielo:S0034-988720200002002522020-06-11Objeción de conciencia y acciones de saludEcheverría B.,CarlosSerani M.,AlejandroArriagada U.,AnamaríaGoic G.,AlejandroRojas O.,AlbertoRuiz-Esquide,GonzaloSalinas R.,RodrigoTaboada R.,PaulinaQuintana V.,CarlosVacarezza Y.,Ricardo Conscience Conscientious Refusal to Treat Refusal to Treat Conscientious Objection arises as a response to a regulation that is judged as immoral. Faced with a law that is considered unfair, the citizen can respond accepting it against his will, exercising conscientious objection on a personal level or, collectively reaching civil disobedience or revolutionary violence. This is an old discussion known since ancient Greece. The current enactment of laws that allow actions previously judged as crime, and that contravene medical tradition, reactivated the discussion about such objection. Some people, such as Savolescu, who denies the legitimacy of conscientious objection invoked by doctors, arguing that it is inefficient, leads to inequality and is inconsistent. He proposes that the values of these professionals can be tolerated privately but should not be determinant in the public sphere. These arguments are critically examined, mentioning pertinent answers from theoretical and practical points of view. We highlight that ethics should not differ in public and private spheres and the principles should be the same, but exercised in different fields. It is concluded that conscientious objection is acquiring legitimacy and that it is necessary to reflect on the underlying reasons that lead to invoke it. It should be considered a civilized resource against determinations of power that are considered to be an attempt against personal values and moral integrity.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedad Médica de SantiagoRevista médica de Chile v.148 n.2 20202020-02-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872020000200252es10.4067/s0034-98872020000200252
institution Scielo Chile
collection Scielo Chile
language Spanish / Castilian
topic Conscience
Conscientious Refusal to Treat
Refusal to Treat
spellingShingle Conscience
Conscientious Refusal to Treat
Refusal to Treat
Echeverría B.,Carlos
Serani M.,Alejandro
Arriagada U.,Anamaría
Goic G.,Alejandro
Rojas O.,Alberto
Ruiz-Esquide,Gonzalo
Salinas R.,Rodrigo
Taboada R.,Paulina
Quintana V.,Carlos
Vacarezza Y.,Ricardo
Objeción de conciencia y acciones de salud
description Conscientious Objection arises as a response to a regulation that is judged as immoral. Faced with a law that is considered unfair, the citizen can respond accepting it against his will, exercising conscientious objection on a personal level or, collectively reaching civil disobedience or revolutionary violence. This is an old discussion known since ancient Greece. The current enactment of laws that allow actions previously judged as crime, and that contravene medical tradition, reactivated the discussion about such objection. Some people, such as Savolescu, who denies the legitimacy of conscientious objection invoked by doctors, arguing that it is inefficient, leads to inequality and is inconsistent. He proposes that the values of these professionals can be tolerated privately but should not be determinant in the public sphere. These arguments are critically examined, mentioning pertinent answers from theoretical and practical points of view. We highlight that ethics should not differ in public and private spheres and the principles should be the same, but exercised in different fields. It is concluded that conscientious objection is acquiring legitimacy and that it is necessary to reflect on the underlying reasons that lead to invoke it. It should be considered a civilized resource against determinations of power that are considered to be an attempt against personal values and moral integrity.
author Echeverría B.,Carlos
Serani M.,Alejandro
Arriagada U.,Anamaría
Goic G.,Alejandro
Rojas O.,Alberto
Ruiz-Esquide,Gonzalo
Salinas R.,Rodrigo
Taboada R.,Paulina
Quintana V.,Carlos
Vacarezza Y.,Ricardo
author_facet Echeverría B.,Carlos
Serani M.,Alejandro
Arriagada U.,Anamaría
Goic G.,Alejandro
Rojas O.,Alberto
Ruiz-Esquide,Gonzalo
Salinas R.,Rodrigo
Taboada R.,Paulina
Quintana V.,Carlos
Vacarezza Y.,Ricardo
author_sort Echeverría B.,Carlos
title Objeción de conciencia y acciones de salud
title_short Objeción de conciencia y acciones de salud
title_full Objeción de conciencia y acciones de salud
title_fullStr Objeción de conciencia y acciones de salud
title_full_unstemmed Objeción de conciencia y acciones de salud
title_sort objeción de conciencia y acciones de salud
publisher Sociedad Médica de Santiago
publishDate 2020
url http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872020000200252
work_keys_str_mv AT echeverriabcarlos objeciondeconcienciayaccionesdesalud
AT seranimalejandro objeciondeconcienciayaccionesdesalud
AT arriagadauanamaria objeciondeconcienciayaccionesdesalud
AT goicgalejandro objeciondeconcienciayaccionesdesalud
AT rojasoalberto objeciondeconcienciayaccionesdesalud
AT ruizesquidegonzalo objeciondeconcienciayaccionesdesalud
AT salinasrrodrigo objeciondeconcienciayaccionesdesalud
AT taboadarpaulina objeciondeconcienciayaccionesdesalud
AT quintanavcarlos objeciondeconcienciayaccionesdesalud
AT vacarezzayricardo objeciondeconcienciayaccionesdesalud
_version_ 1718437111301931008