Factores de riesgo de reacción paradójica asociados a sedación endovenosa con midazolam

Background: Benzodiazepines are used for perioperative conscious sedation. However, its use may be associated with paradoxical reactions. The known risk factors for these reactions are age, alcohol and drug abuse and psychiatric disorders. Aim: To assess the incidence and impact of risk factors of...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Estefó,Magdalena, Ojeda,Dagoberto, Cisternas,Patricia, Arraño,Nicolás, Zanetta,Hugo
Lenguaje:Spanish / Castilian
Publicado: Sociedad Médica de Santiago 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872021000200237
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:scielo:S0034-98872021000200237
record_format dspace
spelling oai:scielo:S0034-988720210002002372021-06-25Factores de riesgo de reacción paradójica asociados a sedación endovenosa con midazolamEstefó,MagdalenaOjeda,DagobertoCisternas,PatriciaArraño,NicolásZanetta,Hugo Benzodiazepines Conscious Sedation Midazolam Risk Factors Background: Benzodiazepines are used for perioperative conscious sedation. However, its use may be associated with paradoxical reactions. The known risk factors for these reactions are age, alcohol and drug abuse and psychiatric disorders. Aim: To assess the incidence and impact of risk factors of paradoxical reactions to midazolam. Material and Methods: Cross sectional study of 218 patients aged 50 ± 16 years (51% women) scheduled for elective surgical procedures under regional anesthesia and midazolam sedation. The paradoxical reactions were classified according to their severity in three categories. Results: The incidence of paradoxical reactions to midazolam was 8.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 5.0-12.7). All were mild and only 28% of the affected patients required pharmacological treatment, none of them flumazenil. A multivariable logistic regression model showed that the variables independently associated with a paradoxical reaction to midazolam were the use of psychoactive medications (Odds Ratio (OR) = 3.4 [1.1-11], p = 0.04, and the dose of midazolam (OR 1.35 [1.03-1.78], p = 0.03. Conclusions: The incidence of paradoxical reactions to midazolam was 8,3% and all were mild. Their risk factors are the use of psychoactive medications and the use of higher doses of midazolam.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedad Médica de SantiagoRevista médica de Chile v.149 n.2 20212021-02-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872021000200237es10.4067/s0034-98872021000200237
institution Scielo Chile
collection Scielo Chile
language Spanish / Castilian
topic Benzodiazepines
Conscious Sedation
Midazolam
Risk Factors
spellingShingle Benzodiazepines
Conscious Sedation
Midazolam
Risk Factors
Estefó,Magdalena
Ojeda,Dagoberto
Cisternas,Patricia
Arraño,Nicolás
Zanetta,Hugo
Factores de riesgo de reacción paradójica asociados a sedación endovenosa con midazolam
description Background: Benzodiazepines are used for perioperative conscious sedation. However, its use may be associated with paradoxical reactions. The known risk factors for these reactions are age, alcohol and drug abuse and psychiatric disorders. Aim: To assess the incidence and impact of risk factors of paradoxical reactions to midazolam. Material and Methods: Cross sectional study of 218 patients aged 50 ± 16 years (51% women) scheduled for elective surgical procedures under regional anesthesia and midazolam sedation. The paradoxical reactions were classified according to their severity in three categories. Results: The incidence of paradoxical reactions to midazolam was 8.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 5.0-12.7). All were mild and only 28% of the affected patients required pharmacological treatment, none of them flumazenil. A multivariable logistic regression model showed that the variables independently associated with a paradoxical reaction to midazolam were the use of psychoactive medications (Odds Ratio (OR) = 3.4 [1.1-11], p = 0.04, and the dose of midazolam (OR 1.35 [1.03-1.78], p = 0.03. Conclusions: The incidence of paradoxical reactions to midazolam was 8,3% and all were mild. Their risk factors are the use of psychoactive medications and the use of higher doses of midazolam.
author Estefó,Magdalena
Ojeda,Dagoberto
Cisternas,Patricia
Arraño,Nicolás
Zanetta,Hugo
author_facet Estefó,Magdalena
Ojeda,Dagoberto
Cisternas,Patricia
Arraño,Nicolás
Zanetta,Hugo
author_sort Estefó,Magdalena
title Factores de riesgo de reacción paradójica asociados a sedación endovenosa con midazolam
title_short Factores de riesgo de reacción paradójica asociados a sedación endovenosa con midazolam
title_full Factores de riesgo de reacción paradójica asociados a sedación endovenosa con midazolam
title_fullStr Factores de riesgo de reacción paradójica asociados a sedación endovenosa con midazolam
title_full_unstemmed Factores de riesgo de reacción paradójica asociados a sedación endovenosa con midazolam
title_sort factores de riesgo de reacción paradójica asociados a sedación endovenosa con midazolam
publisher Sociedad Médica de Santiago
publishDate 2021
url http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872021000200237
work_keys_str_mv AT estefomagdalena factoresderiesgodereaccionparadojicaasociadosasedacionendovenosaconmidazolam
AT ojedadagoberto factoresderiesgodereaccionparadojicaasociadosasedacionendovenosaconmidazolam
AT cisternaspatricia factoresderiesgodereaccionparadojicaasociadosasedacionendovenosaconmidazolam
AT arranonicolas factoresderiesgodereaccionparadojicaasociadosasedacionendovenosaconmidazolam
AT zanettahugo factoresderiesgodereaccionparadojicaasociadosasedacionendovenosaconmidazolam
_version_ 1718437184560693248