Diseño y validación de un instrumento de medición de la carga académica de estudiantes de carreras de la salud

Background: A high academic workload may have adverse consequences among university students. Aim: To design and validate an instrument to measure both real and perceived academic workload for health care students. Material and Methods: The questionnaire was designed based on a bibliographic revi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harden-Díaz,Natalia, Pino-León,Constanza, Orrego-Molina,Shenda, Flores-Alvarado,Sandra, Esturillo-Pinet,Javiera, Flores-Castro,Valentina, Rubio-Calero,Gabriela, Aguiar-Arias,Bárbara, Peralta-Camposano,José
Lenguaje:Spanish / Castilian
Publicado: Sociedad Médica de Santiago 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872021000600873
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Descripción
Sumario:Background: A high academic workload may have adverse consequences among university students. Aim: To design and validate an instrument to measure both real and perceived academic workload for health care students. Material and Methods: The questionnaire was designed based on a bibliographic revision and the conduction of two focus groups conformed by undergraduate students from a Faculty of Medicine. Afterwards, it was submitted to qualitative pre-tests. The final instrument consists of a self-applied questionnaire with both a characterization section (10 questions) and one concerning academic workload by subject and semester (five and two questions, respectively). A national and international panel of 14 experts evaluated the survey content’s validity. The analysis was performed according to the Content Validity Ratio and the Content Validity Index. Results: The complete instrument was validated with an 84% consensus between the judges. Each section of the instrument was approved separately with a 77% and a 94% agreement, respectively. After being individually analyzed by the judges, each question was validated. The wording of questions was improved taking the experts comments into consideration. Conclusions: The proposed instrument constitutes a contribution for the measurement of real and perceived academic workload for students.