Is natural history really dead?: Toward the rebirth of natural history

In recent years natural history has been derided by some scientists as an old-fashion endeavor that does not follow the model of "hard" science and therefore should be considered "dead" and replaced by modern ecology, evolutionary biology, and conservation biology. We contend tha...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	WILLSON,MARY F, ARMESTO,JUAN J
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Sociedad de Biología de Chile 2006
Materias:	ecology naturalists biologists basic science
Acceso en línea:	http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0716-078X2006000200013
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:scielo:S0716-078X2006000200013
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:scielo:S0716-078X20060002000132006-07-24Is natural history really dead?: Toward the rebirth of natural historyWILLSON,MARY FARMESTO,JUAN J ecology naturalists biologists basic science In recent years natural history has been derided by some scientists as an old-fashion endeavor that does not follow the model of "hard" science and therefore should be considered "dead" and replaced by modern ecology, evolutionary biology, and conservation biology. We contend that natural history has much to offer to contemporary scientists and that it has a primary role in the creative process of generating novel hypotheses and designing significant field experiments and observationsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedad de Biología de ChileRevista chilena de historia natural v.79 n.2 20062006-06-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0716-078X2006000200013en10.4067/S0716-078X2006000200013
institution	Scielo Chile
collection	Scielo Chile
language	English
topic	ecology naturalists biologists basic science
spellingShingle	ecology naturalists biologists basic science WILLSON,MARY F ARMESTO,JUAN J Is natural history really dead?: Toward the rebirth of natural history
description	In recent years natural history has been derided by some scientists as an old-fashion endeavor that does not follow the model of "hard" science and therefore should be considered "dead" and replaced by modern ecology, evolutionary biology, and conservation biology. We contend that natural history has much to offer to contemporary scientists and that it has a primary role in the creative process of generating novel hypotheses and designing significant field experiments and observations
author	WILLSON,MARY F ARMESTO,JUAN J
author_facet	WILLSON,MARY F ARMESTO,JUAN J
author_sort	WILLSON,MARY F
title	Is natural history really dead?: Toward the rebirth of natural history
title_short	Is natural history really dead?: Toward the rebirth of natural history
title_full	Is natural history really dead?: Toward the rebirth of natural history
title_fullStr	Is natural history really dead?: Toward the rebirth of natural history
title_full_unstemmed	Is natural history really dead?: Toward the rebirth of natural history
title_sort	is natural history really dead?: toward the rebirth of natural history
publisher	Sociedad de Biología de Chile
publishDate	2006
url	http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0716-078X2006000200013
work_keys_str_mv	AT willsonmaryf isnaturalhistoryreallydeadtowardtherebirthofnaturalhistory AT armestojuanj isnaturalhistoryreallydeadtowardtherebirthofnaturalhistory
_version_	1718439589030395904

Is natural history really dead?: Toward the rebirth of natural history

Ejemplares similares