A modularity-based approach for identifying biodiversity management units

Abstract Background Taxon- and/or ecosystem-based definitions of management units typically focus on conspicuous species and physical habitat limits; these definitions implicitly assume that these classification systems are related to the mechanisms that determine biodiversity persistence. However,...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Borthagaray,Ana Inés, Soutullo,Alvaro, Carranza,Alvar, Arim,Matías
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Sociedad de Biología de Chile 2018
Materias:	Biodiversity units Bipartite networks Compartmentalization Conservation prioritization Metacommunity theory Topological roles
Acceso en línea:	http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0716-078X2018000100202
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:scielo:S0716-078X2018000100202
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:scielo:S0716-078X20180001002022018-03-07A modularity-based approach for identifying biodiversity management unitsBorthagaray,Ana InésSoutullo,AlvaroCarranza,AlvarArim,Matías Biodiversity units Bipartite networks Compartmentalization Conservation prioritization Metacommunity theory Topological roles Abstract Background Taxon- and/or ecosystem-based definitions of management units typically focus on conspicuous species and physical habitat limits; these definitions implicitly assume that these classification systems are related to the mechanisms that determine biodiversity persistence. However, ecological theory shows that this assumption may not be supported. Herein, we introduce the use of modularity analysis for objectively identifying management units and topological roles that land cover type plays on species movement through the landscape. Methods As a case study, we used a coastal system in Uruguay, with 28 land cover types and five taxa (from plants to mammals). A modularity-based approach was used to identify subsets of habitats with biotic affinity, termed modules, across the different taxonomic groups. Modularity detects the tendency of some land cover types to have a higher probability of the mutual interchange of individuals than other land cover types. Based on this approach, pairs of habitats that co-occur in the same module across taxa were considered in the same biodiversity management units (BMU). In addition, the topological role of each habitat was determined based on the occurrence of species through the landscape. Results Our approach determined three management units that combine land cover types usually considered independent, but instead are interrelated by an occurrence-based ecological network as proxies of the potential flow of individual and land use. For each selected taxon, the specific topological role of each habitat was determined. Conclusions This approach provides an objective way of delineating spatial units for conservation assessment. We showed that land cover types within these spatial units could be identified as refuges for specific types of biodiversity, sources of propagules for neighboring or overall landscapes, or stepping-stones connecting sub-regions. The preservation of these topological roles might help maintain the mechanisms that drive biodiversity in the system. Interestingly, the role of land cover type was strongly contingent on the taxa being considered. The method is comprehensible, applicable to policy and decision-makers, and well-connected with ecological theory. Moreover, this approach complements existing methods, introduces novel quantitative uses of available information, determines criteria for land cover classification and identifies management units that are not evident through other approaches.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedad de Biología de ChileRevista chilena de historia natural v.91 20182018-01-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0716-078X2018000100202en10.1186/s40693-018-0072-y
institution	Scielo Chile
collection	Scielo Chile
language	English
topic	Biodiversity units Bipartite networks Compartmentalization Conservation prioritization Metacommunity theory Topological roles
spellingShingle	Biodiversity units Bipartite networks Compartmentalization Conservation prioritization Metacommunity theory Topological roles Borthagaray,Ana Inés Soutullo,Alvaro Carranza,Alvar Arim,Matías A modularity-based approach for identifying biodiversity management units
description	Abstract Background Taxon- and/or ecosystem-based definitions of management units typically focus on conspicuous species and physical habitat limits; these definitions implicitly assume that these classification systems are related to the mechanisms that determine biodiversity persistence. However, ecological theory shows that this assumption may not be supported. Herein, we introduce the use of modularity analysis for objectively identifying management units and topological roles that land cover type plays on species movement through the landscape. Methods As a case study, we used a coastal system in Uruguay, with 28 land cover types and five taxa (from plants to mammals). A modularity-based approach was used to identify subsets of habitats with biotic affinity, termed modules, across the different taxonomic groups. Modularity detects the tendency of some land cover types to have a higher probability of the mutual interchange of individuals than other land cover types. Based on this approach, pairs of habitats that co-occur in the same module across taxa were considered in the same biodiversity management units (BMU). In addition, the topological role of each habitat was determined based on the occurrence of species through the landscape. Results Our approach determined three management units that combine land cover types usually considered independent, but instead are interrelated by an occurrence-based ecological network as proxies of the potential flow of individual and land use. For each selected taxon, the specific topological role of each habitat was determined. Conclusions This approach provides an objective way of delineating spatial units for conservation assessment. We showed that land cover types within these spatial units could be identified as refuges for specific types of biodiversity, sources of propagules for neighboring or overall landscapes, or stepping-stones connecting sub-regions. The preservation of these topological roles might help maintain the mechanisms that drive biodiversity in the system. Interestingly, the role of land cover type was strongly contingent on the taxa being considered. The method is comprehensible, applicable to policy and decision-makers, and well-connected with ecological theory. Moreover, this approach complements existing methods, introduces novel quantitative uses of available information, determines criteria for land cover classification and identifies management units that are not evident through other approaches.
author	Borthagaray,Ana Inés Soutullo,Alvaro Carranza,Alvar Arim,Matías
author_facet	Borthagaray,Ana Inés Soutullo,Alvaro Carranza,Alvar Arim,Matías
author_sort	Borthagaray,Ana Inés
title	A modularity-based approach for identifying biodiversity management units
title_short	A modularity-based approach for identifying biodiversity management units
title_full	A modularity-based approach for identifying biodiversity management units
title_fullStr	A modularity-based approach for identifying biodiversity management units
title_full_unstemmed	A modularity-based approach for identifying biodiversity management units
title_sort	modularity-based approach for identifying biodiversity management units
publisher	Sociedad de Biología de Chile
publishDate	2018
url	http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0716-078X2018000100202
work_keys_str_mv	AT borthagarayanaines amodularitybasedapproachforidentifyingbiodiversitymanagementunits AT soutulloalvaro amodularitybasedapproachforidentifyingbiodiversitymanagementunits AT carranzaalvar amodularitybasedapproachforidentifyingbiodiversitymanagementunits AT arimmatias amodularitybasedapproachforidentifyingbiodiversitymanagementunits AT borthagarayanaines modularitybasedapproachforidentifyingbiodiversitymanagementunits AT soutulloalvaro modularitybasedapproachforidentifyingbiodiversitymanagementunits AT carranzaalvar modularitybasedapproachforidentifyingbiodiversitymanagementunits AT arimmatias modularitybasedapproachforidentifyingbiodiversitymanagementunits
_version_	1718439706351370240

A modularity-based approach for identifying biodiversity management units

Ejemplares similares