MEANING IN THE EYE OF THE BEHOLDER
In this paper the author quotes Widdowson's work "Significance in Conventional and Literary Discourse" (1987) where he argues that there are differences between the way meaning is achieved conventionally (in everyday language) and the way it is achieved in literature. In his analysis,...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Lenguaje: | English |
| Publicado: |
Universidad Católica Silva Henríquez
2001
|
| Acceso en línea: | http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0716-58112001001300007 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:scielo:S0716-58112001001300007 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:scielo:S0716-581120010013000072002-07-03MEANING IN THE EYE OF THE BEHOLDERDíaz H.,RenéIn this paper the author quotes Widdowson's work "Significance in Conventional and Literary Discourse" (1987) where he argues that there are differences between the way meaning is achieved conventionally (in everyday language) and the way it is achieved in literature. In his analysis, the author states the existence of three different levels of signification which correspond to: a) the linguistic sign in the sentence functions as a symbol (its meaning is stable); b) the linguistic sign in the utterance functions as index (its meaning is unstable); and finally c) the language of literature represents a reality which has no counterpart in the conventional world. Interpretation must achieve not reference, but rather representation; the signs take on an iconic characterinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessUniversidad Católica Silva HenríquezLiteratura y lingüística n.13 20012001-01-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0716-58112001001300007en10.4067/S0716-58112001001300007 |
| institution |
Scielo Chile |
| collection |
Scielo Chile |
| language |
English |
| description |
In this paper the author quotes Widdowson's work "Significance in Conventional and Literary Discourse" (1987) where he argues that there are differences between the way meaning is achieved conventionally (in everyday language) and the way it is achieved in literature. In his analysis, the author states the existence of three different levels of signification which correspond to: a) the linguistic sign in the sentence functions as a symbol (its meaning is stable); b) the linguistic sign in the utterance functions as index (its meaning is unstable); and finally c) the language of literature represents a reality which has no counterpart in the conventional world. Interpretation must achieve not reference, but rather representation; the signs take on an iconic character |
| author |
Díaz H.,René |
| spellingShingle |
Díaz H.,René MEANING IN THE EYE OF THE BEHOLDER |
| author_facet |
Díaz H.,René |
| author_sort |
Díaz H.,René |
| title |
MEANING IN THE EYE OF THE BEHOLDER |
| title_short |
MEANING IN THE EYE OF THE BEHOLDER |
| title_full |
MEANING IN THE EYE OF THE BEHOLDER |
| title_fullStr |
MEANING IN THE EYE OF THE BEHOLDER |
| title_full_unstemmed |
MEANING IN THE EYE OF THE BEHOLDER |
| title_sort |
meaning in the eye of the beholder |
| publisher |
Universidad Católica Silva Henríquez |
| publishDate |
2001 |
| url |
http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0716-58112001001300007 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT diazhrene meaningintheeyeofthebeholder |
| _version_ |
1718441160774516736 |