Comparison on the removal of hydrogen sulfide in biotrickling filters inoculated with Thiobacillus thioparus and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans

Emissions of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) by industrial activities is frequent cause of corrosion and unpleasant odours. Treatment of gaseous emissions contaminated with H2S by biotrickling filters inoculated with single cultures of sulfur oxidizer bacteria exhibit several advantages over physicochemical...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aroca,Germán, Urrutia,Homero, Núñez,Dariela, Oyarzún,Patricio, Arancibia,Alejandra, Guerrero,Karlo
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-34582007000400005
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:scielo:S0717-34582007000400005
record_format dspace
spelling oai:scielo:S0717-345820070004000052009-01-19Comparison on the removal of hydrogen sulfide in biotrickling filters inoculated with Thiobacillus thioparus and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidansAroca,GermánUrrutia,HomeroNúñez,DarielaOyarzún,PatricioArancibia,AlejandraGuerrero,Karlo Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans biofilm biofiltration hydrogen sulfide Thiobacillus thioparus Emissions of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) by industrial activities is frequent cause of corrosion and unpleasant odours. Treatment of gaseous emissions contaminated with H2S by biotrickling filters inoculated with single cultures of sulfur oxidizer bacteria exhibit several advantages over physicochemical methods, such as shorter adaptation times and higher removal ability. Biofilms of Thiobacillus thioparus and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans have proved to exhibit high removal capacities, yet no comparative studies between them have been reported. This article reports the efficiency of biotrickling filters inoculated with T. thioparus and A. thiooxidans under similar conditions excepting the pH, that was the optimal for the bacterial growth, for the removal of H2S. The support was selected by determining the respirometric coefficients of the biomass. The maximum removal capacity of the biofilter inoculated with T. thioparus, operating within the range of pH (5.5-7.0) was 14 gS m-3 h-1, lower the value obtained for the biotrickling filter inoculated with A. thiooxidans; 370 gS m-3 h-1. Therefore, it is concluded that acid biotrickling filter inoculated with A. thiooxidans constitute the best strategy to remove H2S, with the advantage that the system not require an exhaustive pH control of the liquid media.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPontificia Universidad Católica de ValparaísoElectronic Journal of Biotechnology v.10 n.4 20072007-10-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-34582007000400005en10.4067/S0717-34582007000400005
institution Scielo Chile
collection Scielo Chile
language English
topic Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans
biofilm
biofiltration
hydrogen sulfide
Thiobacillus thioparus
spellingShingle Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans
biofilm
biofiltration
hydrogen sulfide
Thiobacillus thioparus
Aroca,Germán
Urrutia,Homero
Núñez,Dariela
Oyarzún,Patricio
Arancibia,Alejandra
Guerrero,Karlo
Comparison on the removal of hydrogen sulfide in biotrickling filters inoculated with Thiobacillus thioparus and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans
description Emissions of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) by industrial activities is frequent cause of corrosion and unpleasant odours. Treatment of gaseous emissions contaminated with H2S by biotrickling filters inoculated with single cultures of sulfur oxidizer bacteria exhibit several advantages over physicochemical methods, such as shorter adaptation times and higher removal ability. Biofilms of Thiobacillus thioparus and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans have proved to exhibit high removal capacities, yet no comparative studies between them have been reported. This article reports the efficiency of biotrickling filters inoculated with T. thioparus and A. thiooxidans under similar conditions excepting the pH, that was the optimal for the bacterial growth, for the removal of H2S. The support was selected by determining the respirometric coefficients of the biomass. The maximum removal capacity of the biofilter inoculated with T. thioparus, operating within the range of pH (5.5-7.0) was 14 gS m-3 h-1, lower the value obtained for the biotrickling filter inoculated with A. thiooxidans; 370 gS m-3 h-1. Therefore, it is concluded that acid biotrickling filter inoculated with A. thiooxidans constitute the best strategy to remove H2S, with the advantage that the system not require an exhaustive pH control of the liquid media.
author Aroca,Germán
Urrutia,Homero
Núñez,Dariela
Oyarzún,Patricio
Arancibia,Alejandra
Guerrero,Karlo
author_facet Aroca,Germán
Urrutia,Homero
Núñez,Dariela
Oyarzún,Patricio
Arancibia,Alejandra
Guerrero,Karlo
author_sort Aroca,Germán
title Comparison on the removal of hydrogen sulfide in biotrickling filters inoculated with Thiobacillus thioparus and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans
title_short Comparison on the removal of hydrogen sulfide in biotrickling filters inoculated with Thiobacillus thioparus and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans
title_full Comparison on the removal of hydrogen sulfide in biotrickling filters inoculated with Thiobacillus thioparus and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans
title_fullStr Comparison on the removal of hydrogen sulfide in biotrickling filters inoculated with Thiobacillus thioparus and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans
title_full_unstemmed Comparison on the removal of hydrogen sulfide in biotrickling filters inoculated with Thiobacillus thioparus and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans
title_sort comparison on the removal of hydrogen sulfide in biotrickling filters inoculated with thiobacillus thioparus and acidithiobacillus thiooxidans
publisher Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso
publishDate 2007
url http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-34582007000400005
work_keys_str_mv AT arocagerman comparisonontheremovalofhydrogensulfideinbiotricklingfiltersinoculatedwiththiobacillusthioparusandacidithiobacillusthiooxidans
AT urrutiahomero comparisonontheremovalofhydrogensulfideinbiotricklingfiltersinoculatedwiththiobacillusthioparusandacidithiobacillusthiooxidans
AT nunezdariela comparisonontheremovalofhydrogensulfideinbiotricklingfiltersinoculatedwiththiobacillusthioparusandacidithiobacillusthiooxidans
AT oyarzunpatricio comparisonontheremovalofhydrogensulfideinbiotricklingfiltersinoculatedwiththiobacillusthioparusandacidithiobacillusthiooxidans
AT arancibiaalejandra comparisonontheremovalofhydrogensulfideinbiotricklingfiltersinoculatedwiththiobacillusthioparusandacidithiobacillusthiooxidans
AT guerrerokarlo comparisonontheremovalofhydrogensulfideinbiotricklingfiltersinoculatedwiththiobacillusthioparusandacidithiobacillusthiooxidans
_version_ 1718441774206156800