NITROGEN RUNOFF AND LEACHING LOSSES IN BEEF PRODUCTION SYSTEMS UNDER TWO DIFFERENT STOCKING RATES IN SOUTHERN CHILE

The Lakes Region of Chile produces 60% of the country's milk and 45% of its meat. Production is expected to increase in the near future, yet there are few data on the environmental impact of local livestock systems. A field experiment was carried out during 2004 to measure nitrogen (N) runoff a...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alfaro,Marta, Salaza,Francisco, Iraira,Sergio, Teuber,Nolberto, Ramírez,Luis
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Oceanográficas, Universidad de Concepción 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-66432005000200008
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:scielo:S0717-66432005000200008
record_format dspace
spelling oai:scielo:S0717-664320050002000082006-03-22NITROGEN RUNOFF AND LEACHING LOSSES IN BEEF PRODUCTION SYSTEMS UNDER TWO DIFFERENT STOCKING RATES IN SOUTHERN CHILEAlfaro,MartaSalaza,FranciscoIraira,SergioTeuber,NolbertoRamírez,Luis Andisol ammonium nitrate livestock production The Lakes Region of Chile produces 60% of the country's milk and 45% of its meat. Production is expected to increase in the near future, yet there are few data on the environmental impact of local livestock systems. A field experiment was carried out during 2004 to measure nitrogen (N) runoff and leaching losses in beef cattle-grazing production systems near Osorno. Grazing was carried out with Holstein-Friesian steers of 220 kg of initial live weight, with stocking rates of 3.5 and 5 steers ha-1. Water samples were collected during 6.5 months with surface lysimeters and ceramic cups, and were analyzed for nitrate and ammonium. Total losses were calculated as the product of N concentration and accumulated drainage at each sampling date. A significant difference in the total N loss was found between the two treatments (11.1 and 29.9 kg N ha-1, respectively; P < 0.05). The main pathway of N loss was leaching, which contributed 99% of the total N loss. Nitrate was the main form of N loss in runoff (71%) and leaching (99%). Average nitrate concentration in leaching samples was always below the European Community Directive limit. However, nitrate concentration in runoff samples had maximum values of 116 ± 13.8 and 82 ± 22.4 mg L-1 for the 3.5 and 5 steers ha-1 treatments, respectively. For the experimental conditions tested, N losses from beef cattle production systems were low. This was related to the low N inputs in fertilizers used and to the physical and chemical properties of the volcanic soilsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFacultad de Ciencias Naturales y Oceanográficas, Universidad de ConcepciónGayana. Botánica v.62 n.2 20052005-01-01text/htmlhttp://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-66432005000200008en10.4067/S0717-66432005000200008
institution Scielo Chile
collection Scielo Chile
language English
topic Andisol
ammonium
nitrate
livestock production
spellingShingle Andisol
ammonium
nitrate
livestock production
Alfaro,Marta
Salaza,Francisco
Iraira,Sergio
Teuber,Nolberto
Ramírez,Luis
NITROGEN RUNOFF AND LEACHING LOSSES IN BEEF PRODUCTION SYSTEMS UNDER TWO DIFFERENT STOCKING RATES IN SOUTHERN CHILE
description The Lakes Region of Chile produces 60% of the country's milk and 45% of its meat. Production is expected to increase in the near future, yet there are few data on the environmental impact of local livestock systems. A field experiment was carried out during 2004 to measure nitrogen (N) runoff and leaching losses in beef cattle-grazing production systems near Osorno. Grazing was carried out with Holstein-Friesian steers of 220 kg of initial live weight, with stocking rates of 3.5 and 5 steers ha-1. Water samples were collected during 6.5 months with surface lysimeters and ceramic cups, and were analyzed for nitrate and ammonium. Total losses were calculated as the product of N concentration and accumulated drainage at each sampling date. A significant difference in the total N loss was found between the two treatments (11.1 and 29.9 kg N ha-1, respectively; P < 0.05). The main pathway of N loss was leaching, which contributed 99% of the total N loss. Nitrate was the main form of N loss in runoff (71%) and leaching (99%). Average nitrate concentration in leaching samples was always below the European Community Directive limit. However, nitrate concentration in runoff samples had maximum values of 116 ± 13.8 and 82 ± 22.4 mg L-1 for the 3.5 and 5 steers ha-1 treatments, respectively. For the experimental conditions tested, N losses from beef cattle production systems were low. This was related to the low N inputs in fertilizers used and to the physical and chemical properties of the volcanic soils
author Alfaro,Marta
Salaza,Francisco
Iraira,Sergio
Teuber,Nolberto
Ramírez,Luis
author_facet Alfaro,Marta
Salaza,Francisco
Iraira,Sergio
Teuber,Nolberto
Ramírez,Luis
author_sort Alfaro,Marta
title NITROGEN RUNOFF AND LEACHING LOSSES IN BEEF PRODUCTION SYSTEMS UNDER TWO DIFFERENT STOCKING RATES IN SOUTHERN CHILE
title_short NITROGEN RUNOFF AND LEACHING LOSSES IN BEEF PRODUCTION SYSTEMS UNDER TWO DIFFERENT STOCKING RATES IN SOUTHERN CHILE
title_full NITROGEN RUNOFF AND LEACHING LOSSES IN BEEF PRODUCTION SYSTEMS UNDER TWO DIFFERENT STOCKING RATES IN SOUTHERN CHILE
title_fullStr NITROGEN RUNOFF AND LEACHING LOSSES IN BEEF PRODUCTION SYSTEMS UNDER TWO DIFFERENT STOCKING RATES IN SOUTHERN CHILE
title_full_unstemmed NITROGEN RUNOFF AND LEACHING LOSSES IN BEEF PRODUCTION SYSTEMS UNDER TWO DIFFERENT STOCKING RATES IN SOUTHERN CHILE
title_sort nitrogen runoff and leaching losses in beef production systems under two different stocking rates in southern chile
publisher Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Oceanográficas, Universidad de Concepción
publishDate 2005
url http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-66432005000200008
work_keys_str_mv AT alfaromarta nitrogenrunoffandleachinglossesinbeefproductionsystemsundertwodifferentstockingratesinsouthernchile
AT salazafrancisco nitrogenrunoffandleachinglossesinbeefproductionsystemsundertwodifferentstockingratesinsouthernchile
AT irairasergio nitrogenrunoffandleachinglossesinbeefproductionsystemsundertwodifferentstockingratesinsouthernchile
AT teubernolberto nitrogenrunoffandleachinglossesinbeefproductionsystemsundertwodifferentstockingratesinsouthernchile
AT ramirezluis nitrogenrunoffandleachinglossesinbeefproductionsystemsundertwodifferentstockingratesinsouthernchile
_version_ 1718442222984101888